Pith. sign in

REVIEW

SHELS: A Complete Galaxy Redshift Survey with Rleq20.6

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1405.7704 v1 pith:EOXV2SPY submitted 2014-05-29 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

SHELS: A Complete Galaxy Redshift Survey with Rleq20.6

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords surveyredshiftgalaxycompletemassprimestellardata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The SHELS (Smithsonian Hectospec Lensing Survey) is a complete redshift survey covering two well-separated fields (F1 and F2) of the Deep Lens Survey to a limiting R = 20.6. Here we describe the redshift survey of the F2 field (R.A.$_{2000}$ = 09$^h$19$^m$32.4$^s$ and Decl.$_{2000}$ = +30$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$). The survey includes 16,294 new redshifts measured with the Hectospec on the MMT. The resulting survey of the 4 deg$^2$ F2 field is 95\% complete to R = 20.6, currently the densest survey to this magnitude limit. The median survey redshift is $ z = 0.3$; the survey provides a view of structure in the range 0.1 $ \lesssim z \lesssim 0.6$. A movie displays the large-scale structure in the survey region. We provide a redshift, spectral index D$_n$4000, and stellar mass for each galaxy in the survey. We also provide a metallicity for each galaxy in the range 0.2 $< z <0. 38$. To demonstrate potential applications of the survey, we examine the behavior of the index D$_n$4000 as a function of galaxy luminosity, stellar mass, and redshift. The known evolutionary and stellar mass dependent properties of the galaxy population are cleanly evident in the data. We also show that the mass-metallicity relation previously determined from these data is robust to the analysis approach.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.