Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Testing X-ray Measurements of Galaxy Cluster Gas Mass Fraction Using the Cosmic Distance-Duality Relation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1305.2077 v1 pith:MOLXIFEP submitted 2013-05-09 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE

Testing X-ray Measurements of Galaxy Cluster Gas Mass Fraction Using the Cosmic Distance-Duality Relation

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE
keywords datacosmologyfractionmassx-rayallenconfidencecosmic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a consistency test of some recent X-ray gas mass fraction ($f_{\rm{gas}}$) measurements in galaxy clusters, using the cosmic distance-duality relation, $\eta_{\rm{theory}}=\dl(1+z)^{-2}/\da$, with luminosity distance ($\dl$) data from the Union2 compilation of type Ia supernovae. We set $\eta_{\rm{theory}}\equiv1$, instead of assigning any redshift parameterizations to it, and constrain the cosmological information preferred by $f_{\rm{gas}}$ data along with supernova observations. We adopt a new binning method in the reduction of the Union2 data, in order to minimize the statistical errors. Four data sets of X-ray gas mass fraction, which are reported by Allen et al. (2 samples), LaRoque et al. and Ettori et al., are detailedly analyzed against two theoretical modelings of $f_{\rm{gas}}$. The results from the analysis of Allen et al.'s samples prove the feasibility of our method. It is found that the preferred cosmology by LaRoque et al.'s sample is consistent with its reference cosmology within 1-$\sigma$ confidence level. However, for Ettori et al.'s $f_{\rm{gas}}$ sample, the inconsistency can reach more than 3-$\sigma$ confidence level and this dataset shows special preference to an $\Ol=0$ cosmology.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.