Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantum Griffiths phase in CePd(1-x)Rh(x) with x ~ 0.8

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0910.5840 v1 pith:KMGZC63D submitted 2009-10-30 cond-mat.str-el

Quantum Griffiths phase in CePd(1-x)Rh(x) with x ~ 0.8

classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords lambdagriffithsquantumcepddependencephaseproptoscenario
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The magnetic field dependence of the magnetisation ($M$) and the temperature dependence of the ac susceptibility ($\chi' = dM/dH$) of CePd(1-x)Rh(x) single crystals with $0.80 \leq x \leq 0.86$ are analysed within the frame of the quantum Griffiths phase scenario, which predicts $M \propto H^{\lambda}$ and $\chi' \propto T^{\lambda-1}$ with $0 \leq \lambda \leq 1$. All $M$ vs $H$ and $\chi'$ vs $T$ data follow the predicted power-law behaviour. The parameter $\lambda$, extracted from $\chi'(T)$, is very sensitive to the Rh content $x$ and varies systematically with $x$ from -0.1 to 0.4. The value of $\lambda$, derived from $M(H)$ measurements on a \cpr single crystal, seems to be rather constant, $\lambda \approx 0.2$, in a broad range of temperatures between 0.05 and 2 K and fields up to about 10 T. All observed signatures and the $\lambda$ values are thus compatible with the quantum Griffiths scenario.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.