Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Studying X-ray reprocessing and continuum variability in quasars: PG 1211+143

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0906.4882 v1 pith:AZOPDSHG submitted 2009-06-26 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE

Studying X-ray reprocessing and continuum variability in quasars: PG 1211+143

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE
keywords x-raydiskopticalphotometrypossibleaccretioncampaigncurves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the results from a monitoring campaign of the Narrow-Line Seyfert~1 galaxy PG 1211+143. The object was monitored with ground-based facilities (UBVRI photometry; from February to July, 2007) and with Swift (X-ray photometry/spectroscopy and UV/Optical photometry; between March and May, 2007). We found PG 1211+143 in a historical low X-ray flux state at the beginning of the Swift monitoring campaign in March 2007. It is seen from the light curves that while violently variable in X-rays, the quasar shows little variations in optical/UV bands. The X-ray spectrum in the low state is similar to other Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxies during their low-states and can be explained by a strong partial covering absorber or by X-ray reflection onto the disk. With the current data set, however, it is not possible to distinguish between both scenarios. The interband cross-correlation functions indicate a possible reprocessing of the X-rays into the longer wavelengths, consistent with the idea of a thin accretion disk, powering the quasar. The time lags between the X-ray and the optical/UV light curves, ranging from ~2 to ~18 days for the different wavebands, scale approximately as ~lambda^(4/3), but appear to be somewhat larger than expected for this object, taking into account its accretion disk parameters. Possible implications for the location of the X-ray irradiating source are discussed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.