Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Use of Astronomical Literature - A Report on Usage Patterns

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0808.0103 v2 pith:I3ODP2XM submitted 2008-08-01 cs.DL astro-ph

Use of Astronomical Literature - A Report on Usage Patterns

Edwin A. Henneken , Michael J. Kurtz , Alberto Accomazzi , Carolyn S. Grant , Donna Thompson , Elizabeth Bohlen , Stephen S. Murray This is my paper
classification cs.DL astro-ph
keywords astronomicaldifferentliteraturenasasystemusageusedwill
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we present a number of metrics for usage of the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS). Since the ADS is used by the entire astronomical community, these are indicative of how the astronomical literature is used. We will show how the use of the ADS has changed both quantitatively and qualitatively. We will also show that different types of users access the system in different ways. Finally, we show how use of the ADS has evolved over the years in various regions of the world. The ADS is funded by NASA Grant NNG06GG68G.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.