Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Thermodynamics and superfluid density in BCS-BEC crossover with and without population imbalance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0707.1751 v1 pith:D3AOVRUL submitted 2007-07-12 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.supr-con

Thermodynamics and superfluid density in BCS-BEC crossover with and without population imbalance

classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.supr-con
keywords densitysuperfluidconsistentcrossoverliteratureprofilesaddressbcs-bec
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We address the thermodynamics, density profiles and superfluid density of trapped fermions undergoing BCS-BEC crossover, with and without population imbalance. Our approach represents a fully consistent treatment of "pseudogap effects", which reflect the distinction between the pair formation temperature $T^*$ and the pair condensation temperature $T_c$ and must be accommodated by modifying the fermionic excitation spectrum. This distinction has been omitted from all other many body approaches in the literature. We show how enforcing this corollary implies that pairing fluctuation contributions enter into both the gap and the number equations; this is necessary in order to be consistent with a generalized Ward identity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that we obtain physical results for the superfluid density $n_s(T)$ at all $T$. In contrast, previous work in the literature has led to ill-behaved $n_s(T)$. The superfluid density is a critical measure of the physicality of a given crossover theory. In order to properly address thermodynamic properties of a trapped Fermi gas, it is necessary to demonstrate that the particle density profiles are consistent with experiment. The lack of demonstrable consistency between theoretical and experimental density profiles, along with problematic behavior found for $n_s(T)$, casts doubt on previous claims in the literature concerning quantitative agreement between thermodynamical calculations and experiment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.