Pith. sign in

Researcher Evidence Record

Nataliia Stulova

This bounded record lists 8 Pith paper rows and 0 imported work rows attributed to this corpus identity. The enumerated, non-disputed paper rows include cs.PL, cs.SE work dated 2014 to 2022. The record describes sources and coverage; it makes no judgment about the person.

Compiled coverage vector

Measured lane counts only. Not a trust score or person verdict.

Enumerated paper scope: 2 fields (cs.PL, cs.SE) · 2014-2022 sources: authors, author_identifiers · paper_authors · author_works · current_verdicts · cited_works

A sourced case file for attributed work. It is neither a profile score nor a verdict about this researcher.

Attributed works

A bounded ledger from the Pith paper and imported-work queries. Counts and source confidence stay with each work.

  1. 2022 Pith paper

    A Decade of Code Comment Quality Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review

    cs.SE provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    3
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  2. 2021 Pith paper

    RepliComment: Identifying Clones in Code Comments

    cs.SE provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  3. 2021 Pith paper

    Do Comments follow Commenting Conventions? A Case Study in Java and Python

    cs.SE provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    3
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  4. 2018 Pith paper

    An Approach to Static Performance Guarantees for Programs with Run-time Checks

    cs.PL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  5. 2017 Pith paper

    Exploiting Term Hiding to Reduce Run-time Checking Overhead

    cs.PL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  6. 2015 Pith paper

    Practical Run-time Checking via Unobtrusive Property Caching

    cs.PL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  7. 2014 Pith paper

    Towards Assertion-based Debugging of Higher-Order (C)LP Programs

    cs.PL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  8. 2014 Pith paper

    An Approach to Assertion-based Debugging of Higher-Order (C)LP Programs

    cs.PL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nataliia Stulova
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.

Evidence apparatus

The machinery behind this record. Every lane states whether Pith measured it, did not query it, could not reach it, or withheld it.

LaneStateObservedBoundary and source
identity Measured 2 Canonical identity row plus public typed identifiers.
source=authors, author_identifiers
papers Measured 8 of 8 bounded rows Rows attributed to this author UUID in the Pith corpus.
source=paper_authors
works Measured zero 0 of 0 bounded rows Imported works not duplicated by the paper ledger.
source=author_works
reviews Measured zero 0 of 8 bounded rows Coverage count only. No review outcome is projected onto the person.
source=current_verdicts
citations Measured zero 0 of 8 bounded rows Counts remain itemized by work and source.
source=cited_works
coauthors Measured 11 of 8 bounded rows Shared-work edges from admitted paper rows.
source=paper_authors
account Unavailable No public count of 1 bounded rows Account metadata is separate from corpus evidence.
source=users.author_id
Public identity sources
  • name variant
    Nataliia Stulova
    backfill
    confidence 0.6
Enumerated research scope

Fields and dates come only from enumerated, non-disputed Pith paper rows. They do not claim career completeness.

  • cs.PL5 rows
  • cs.SE3 rows
  • 20142 rows
  • 20151 rows
  • 20171 rows
  • 20181 rows
  • 20212 rows
  • 20221 rows
Shared-work index
Record scope

The work queries are bounded. Missing rows may mean measured zero, an unavailable source, a query that did not run, or private data that Pith withheld. The lane table keeps those cases separate.

Paper findings remain attached to papers. They do not become findings about this researcher.