Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.00964 v1 pith:25DCCRSH submitted 2020-01-03 cs.CY

Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing

classification cs.CY
keywords auditingconcernsethicalfacialalgorithmicrecognitiontechnologyadditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although essential to revealing biased performance, well intentioned attempts at algorithmic auditing can have effects that may harm the very populations these measures are meant to protect. This concern is even more salient while auditing biometric systems such as facial recognition, where the data is sensitive and the technology is often used in ethically questionable manners. We demonstrate a set of five ethical concerns in the particular case of auditing commercial facial processing technology, highlighting additional design considerations and ethical tensions the auditor needs to be aware of so as not exacerbate or complement the harms propagated by the audited system. We go further to provide tangible illustrations of these concerns, and conclude by reflecting on what these concerns mean for the role of the algorithmic audit and the fundamental product limitations they reveal.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Relative Principals, Pluralistic Alignment, and the Structural Value Alignment Problem

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AI value alignment is reconceptualized as a pluralistic governance problem arising along three axes—objectives, information, and principals—making it inherently context-dependent and unsolvable by technical design alone.