Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Distribution of Cycle Lengths in Graphical Models for Iterative Decoding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cs/9907002 v1 pith:DF6KUI2G submitted 1999-07-02 cs.DM

The Distribution of Cycle Lengths in Graphical Models for Iterative Decoding

classification cs.DM
keywords cycledecodinglengthlengthslesscyclesdistributionequal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper analyzes the distribution of cycle lengths in turbo decoding and low-density parity check (LDPC) graphs. The properties of such cycles are of significant interest in the context of iterative decoding algorithms which are based on belief propagation or message passing. We estimate the probability that there exist no simple cycles of length less than or equal to k at a randomly chosen node in a turbo decoding graph using a combination of counting arguments and independence assumptions. For large block lengths n, this probability is approximately e^{-{2^{k-1}-4}/n}, k>=4. Simulation results validate the accuracy of the various approximations. For example, for turbo codes with a block length of 64000, a randomly chosen node has a less than 1% chance of being on a cycle of length less than or equal to 10, but has a greater than 99.9% chance of being on a cycle of length less than or equal to 20. The effect of the "S-random" permutation is also analyzed and it is shown that while it eliminates short cycles of length k<8, it does not significantly affect the overall distribution of cycle lengths. Similar analyses and simulations are also presented for graphs for LDPC codes. The paper concludes by commenting briefly on how these results may provide insight into the practical success of iterative decoding methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.