Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement Constraints on the Hubble Constant, the Deviation from the Spatially-Flat Λcdm Model, The Deceleration-Acceleration Transition Redshift, and Spatial Curvature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.03437 v2 pith:DA76RS4B submitted 2017-11-09 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement Constraints on the Hubble Constant, the Deviation from the Spatially-Flat Λcdm Model, The Deceleration-Acceleration Transition Redshift, and Spatial Curvature

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords datasubsetsconsistentcontinuouscurvaturehubblelambdaparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We compile a complete collection of reliable Hubble parameter $H(z)$ data to redshift $z \leq 2.36$ and use them with the Gaussian Process method to determine continuous $H(z)$ functions for various data subsets. From these continuous $H(z)$'s, summarizing across the data subsets considered, we find $H_0\sim 67 \pm 4\,\rm km/s/Mpc$, more consistent with the recent lower values determined using a variety of techniques. In most data subsets, we see a cosmological deceleration-acceleration transition at 2$\sigma$ significance, with the data subsets transition redshifts varying over $0.33<z_{\rm da}<1.0$ at 1$\sigma$ significance. We find that the flat-$\Lambda$CDM model is consistent with the $H(z)$ data to a $z$ of 1.5 to 2.0, depending on data subset considered, with 2$\sigma$ deviations from flat-$\Lambda$CDM above this redshift range. Using the continuous $H(z)$ with baryon acoustic oscillation distance-redshift observations, we constrain the current spatial curvature density parameter to be $\Omega_{K0}=-0.03\pm0.21$, consistent with a flat universe, but the large error bar does not rule out small values of spatial curvature that are now under debate.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.