Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 37 references

A new dataset tracks U.S. county skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity from 433.6 million job postings over 15 years.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 18:50 UTC pith:ACOOWYKO

load-bearing objection This is a data release paper offering a large new county-level panel on skill specialization from job postings that extends prior work in scale and employer breakdowns. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.09918 v1 pith:ACOOWYKO submitted 2026-06-06 econ.GN q-fin.EC

An economic geography dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity

Anthony Howell , Maryann Feldman , Lauren Lanahan , Nikhil Kalathil , Evan Johnson This is my paper
classification econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords economic geographyskill specializationrelatednesscomplexityjob postingsU.S. countieslabor demanddataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper releases a panel dataset for 3,194 U.S. counties from 2010 to 2024 built from 433.6 million job postings and containing 201 variables on labor demand volumes, work modalities such as remote and internship shares, and employer skill demand structures. It constructs economic geography measures of specialization, relatedness, diversity, complexity, and dynamics at the county level, with further breakdowns by employer entity types including corporate, university, government, and federal labs, plus entity-pair measures of alignment, overlap, and directional skill gaps. An interactive dashboard supports visualization, county rankings, trends, pairwise comparisons, and individual profiles. This setup lets researchers examine how skill demands are distributed spatially, how they evolve, and how they differ across employer types.

Core claim

We release a new dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity, derived from 433.6 million job postings between 2010 and 2024. The panel covers 3,194 counties across 15 years and reports 201 variables that describe the volume of job postings, the modality and nature of work, and the structure of employer skill demand by category. We develop a suite of economic geography variables: skill-based measures of county specialization, relatedness, diversity, complexity, and dynamics. These measures are further decomposed by employer entity type, along with entity-pair measures of alignment, overlap, and directional skill gaps.

What carries the argument

The suite of skill-based economic geography measures of county specialization, relatedness, diversity, complexity, and dynamics derived from job postings, decomposed by employer entity type with added entity-pair alignment and gap measures.

Load-bearing premise

Job postings serve as a reliable proxy for actual employer skill demand and labor market structure across counties and employer types.

What would settle it

A direct comparison in which the derived skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity measures show no correlation with independent county-level employment surveys or economic performance indicators would undermine the dataset.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Analysts can map and compare spatial patterns of skill demand and complexity across all U.S. counties over time.
  • Decompositions by employer type enable study of how corporate, university, government, and federal lab skill demands differ or align.
  • Entity-pair measures support analysis of directional skill gaps and overlaps between different organizations.
  • The panel structure allows tracking of changes in specialization and complexity as counties evolve.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The measures could be tested against county economic growth data to check whether higher complexity predicts stronger outcomes.
  • Pairing the job-posting variables with actual hiring records might reveal how well the proxies capture realized labor market matches.
  • The dashboard's county comparison features could support identification of peer regions with similar skill profiles for policy experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript releases a new panel dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity derived from 433.6 million job postings (2010–2024). The panel covers 3,194 counties across 15 years and reports 201 variables on job-posting volume, work modality (e.g., remote and internship shares), and employer skill-demand structure by category. It further supplies derived economic-geography measures—specialization, relatedness, diversity, complexity, and dynamics—decomposed by employer entity type (corporate, university, government, federal lab) together with entity-pair alignment, overlap, and directional gap measures, accompanied by an interactive dashboard for visualization, rankings, and county profiles.

Significance. If the construction and documentation are complete, the release would be a useful addition to the economic-geography literature by supplying county-level, longitudinal skill-demand data at unprecedented scale. Strengths include the 15-year panel, employer-type decompositions, pairwise alignment metrics, and the public dashboard that enables both academic and applied use.

major comments (1)
  1. [Data and Methods] The manuscript provides counts of postings and variable categories but does not supply the explicit formulas, aggregation rules, or validation steps used to construct the 201 variables and the derived specialization/relatedness/complexity indices. Because the central claim is the release of these constructed measures, the absence of reproducible construction details is load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Add a clear statement of data access, licensing, and version control (e.g., DOI or GitHub repository) to the abstract and main text.
  2. [Discussion] Include a short limitations subsection discussing known biases in job-posting data (e.g., coverage of small employers or non-posted vacancies).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for emphasizing the importance of reproducibility in the dataset release. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Data and Methods] The manuscript provides counts of postings and variable categories but does not supply the explicit formulas, aggregation rules, or validation steps used to construct the 201 variables and the derived specialization/relatedness/complexity indices. Because the central claim is the release of these constructed measures, the absence of reproducible construction details is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit construction details limits the dataset's immediate usability. The original manuscript prioritized variable descriptions and economic applications over technical appendices to maintain readability. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated 'Construction and Validation' subsection that supplies (i) the precise formulas for all 201 base variables and the derived indices (location quotients for specialization, co-occurrence-based relatedness matrices, fitness-complexity algorithm for complexity, etc.), (ii) the aggregation rules from individual postings to county-year observations, (iii) employer-type decomposition procedures, and (iv) validation steps against external benchmarks such as BLS occupational employment statistics. We will also deposit the full replication code in the public repository. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This is a data-release paper whose central claim is the public availability of a panel dataset constructed from 433.6 million job postings. The abstract and description enumerate coverage, variable categories, and derived measures (specialization, relatedness, complexity) without presenting equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations that reduce any result to its own inputs by construction. No load-bearing derivation chain exists to inspect.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all fields left empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5710 in / 970 out tokens · 18942 ms · 2026-06-27T18:50:24.713651+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We release a new dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity, derived from 433.6 million job postings between 2010 and 2024. The panel covers 3,194 counties across 15 years and reports 201 variables that describe the volume of job postings (e.g., labor demand), the modality and nature of work (e.g., remote share, internship share), and the structure of employer skill demand by category (e.g., specialized, software, and common). We develop a suite of economic geography variables: skill-based measures of county specialization, relatedness, diversity, complexity, and dynamics. These measures are further decomposed by employer entity type (corporate, university, government, and federal lab), along with entity-pair measures of alignment, overlap, and directional skill gaps. An accompanying interactive dashboard supports both academic research and applied use, with features including spatiotemporal visualization, county rankings and trends, pairwise county comparisons, and individual county profiles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09918 by Anthony Howell, Evan Johnson, Lauren Lanahan, Maryann Feldman, Nikhil Kalathil.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: National posting volumes, summed across counties (left), and year-over-year percent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: National posting volume by metro tier (left) and employer type (right), log scale. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mean skill mentions per posting at the median county, with interquartile range. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Total postings by county, 2024 (log color scale). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Number of RCA > 1 skills by county, 2024 (log color scale) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ECI by county, 2024 (diverging color scale). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Shannon entropy of skill mentions, median county with IQR. 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Year 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.012 Skill concentration (HHI) Skill concentration (HHI), county-year panel IQR (p25-p75) Median [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: County count of RCA > 1 skills versus total postings, 2024 (log-log). Notes: Observations are counties. The sample is the n = 2,957 counties with at least 100 postings in 2024, excluding state-level placeholder FIPS codes ending in 999. The fitted curve is a LOWESS smoother (bandwidth 0.3) of log10 RCA-skill count on log10 total postings; counties are colored blue if above the curve, red if below. Spearman… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Tacchella skill fitness (log scale) versus ECI, 2024. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Skill coherence versus skill density, 2024. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Entity-decomposed extension over 2010–2024. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, 2012

    Enrico Moretti.The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    The determinants and welfare implications of US workers’ diverging location choices by skill: 1980–2000.American Economic Review, 106(3):479–524, 2016

    Rebecca Diamond. The determinants and welfare implications of US workers’ diverging location choices by skill: 1980–2000.American Economic Review, 106(3):479–524, 2016

    1980

  3. [3]

    Work of the past, work of the future.AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109:1–32,

    David Autor. Work of the past, work of the future.AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109:1–32,

  4. [4]

    Petralia, Mathieu P

    Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Cristian Jara-Figueroa, Sergio G. Petralia, Mathieu P. A. Steijn, David L. Rigby, and César A. Hidalgo. Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3):248–254, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Timothy J. Bartik. Using Place-Based Jobs policies to help distressed communities.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3):99–127, 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions.Economic Geography, 87(3): 237–265, 2011

    Frank Neffke, Martin Henning, and Ron Boschma. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions.Economic Geography, 87(3): 237–265, 2011

    2011

  7. [7]

    Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda.Regional Studies, 51(3):351–364, 2017

    Ron Boschma. Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda.Regional Studies, 51(3):351–364, 2017

    2017

  8. [8]

    Hidalgo, Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Ron Boschma, Mercedes Delgado, Maryann Feldman, Koen Frenken, Edward Glaeser, Canfei He, Dieter F

    César A. Hidalgo, Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Ron Boschma, Mercedes Delgado, Maryann Feldman, Koen Frenken, Edward Glaeser, Canfei He, Dieter F. Kogler, Andrea Morrison, Frank Neffke, David Rigby, Scott Stern, Siqi Zheng, and Shengjun Zhu. The principle of relatedness. In Alfredo J. Morales, Carlos Gershenson, Dan Braha, Ali A. Minai, and Yaneer Bar-Yam, ed...

    2018

  9. [9]

    The new paradigm of economic complexity.Research Policy, 51(3):104450, 2022

    Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Tom Broekel, Dario Diodato, Elisa Giuliani, Ricardo Hausmann, Neave O’Clery, and David Rigby. The new paradigm of economic complexity.Research Policy, 51(3):104450, 2022

    2022

  10. [10]

    Hidalgo, Bailey Klinger, Albert-László Barabási, and Ricardo Hausmann

    César A. Hidalgo, Bailey Klinger, Albert-László Barabási, and Ricardo Hausmann. The product space conditions the development of nations.Science, 317(5837):482–487, 2007

    2007

  11. [11]

    Kogler, David L

    Dieter F. Kogler, David L. Rigby, and Isaac Tucker. Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities.European Planning Studies, 21(9):1374–1391, 2013

    2013

  12. [12]

    Frank, Lijun Sun, Bedoor AlShebli, César Hidalgo, and Iyad Rahwan

    Ahmad Alabdulkareem, Morgan R. Frank, Lijun Sun, Bedoor AlShebli, César Hidalgo, and Iyad Rahwan. Unpacking the polarization of workplace skills.Science Advances, 4(7):eaao6030, 2018. An economic geography dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity 26

    2018

  13. [13]

    Skill relatedness and firm diversification.Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 34(3):297–316, 2013

    Frank Neffke and Martin Henning. Skill relatedness and firm diversification.Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 34(3):297–316, 2013

    2013

  14. [14]

    Why do industries coagglomerate? how Marshallian externalities differ by industry and have evolved over time.Journal of Urban Economics, 106:1–26, 2018

    Dario Diodato, Frank Neffke, and Neave O’Clery. Why do industries coagglomerate? how Marshallian externalities differ by industry and have evolved over time.Journal of Urban Economics, 106:1–26, 2018

    2018

  15. [15]

    Deming and Kadeem Noray

    David J. Deming and Kadeem Noray. Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4):1965–2005, 2020

    1965

  16. [16]

    Deming and Lisa B

    David J. Deming and Lisa B. Kahn. Skill requirements across firms and labor markets: Evidence from job postings for professionals.Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1):S337–S369, 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    Brad Hershbein and Lisa B. Kahn. Do recessions accelerate routine-biased technological change? Evidence from vacancy postings.American Economic Review, 108(7):1737–1772, 2018

    2018

  18. [18]

    David J. Deming. The growing importance of social skills in the labor market.The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4):1593–1640, 2017

    2017

  19. [19]

    Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies.Journal of Labor Economics, 40(S1):S293–S340,

    Daron Acemoglu, David Autor, Jonathon Hazell, and Pascual Restrepo. Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies.Journal of Labor Economics, 40(S1):S293–S340,

  20. [20]

    The demand for AI skills in the labor market.Labour Economics, 71:102002, 2021

    Liudmila Alekseeva, José Azar, Mireia Giné, Sampsa Samila, and Bledi Taska. The demand for AI skills in the labor market.Labour Economics, 71:102002, 2021

    2021

  21. [21]

    Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation.Journal of Financial Economics, 151:103745, 2024

    Tania Babina, Anastassia Fedyk, Alex He, and James Hodson. Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation.Journal of Financial Economics, 151:103745, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Felten, Manav Raj, and Robert Seamans

    Edward W. Felten, Manav Raj, and Robert Seamans. Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses.Strategic Management Journal, 42(12):2195–2217, 2021

    2021

  23. [23]

    Labor market concentration.Journal of Human Resources, 57(S):S167–S199, 2022

    José Azar, Ioana Marinescu, and Marshall Steinbaum. Labor market concentration.Journal of Human Resources, 57(S):S167–S199, 2022

    2022

  24. [24]

    Hidalgo and Ricardo Hausmann

    César A. Hidalgo and Ricardo Hausmann. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26):10570–10575, 2009

    2009

  25. [25]

    The geography of complex knowledge.Economic Geography, 93(1):1–23, 2017

    Pierre-Alexandre Balland and David Rigby. The geography of complex knowledge.Economic Geography, 93(1):1–23, 2017

    2017

  26. [26]

    Technological complexity and economic growth of regions

    Lars Mewes and Tom Broekel. Technological complexity and economic growth of regions. Research Policy, 51(8):104156, 2022

    2022

  27. [27]

    On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation.Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1):1–42, 2015

    Ron Martin and Peter Sunley. On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation.Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1):1–42, 2015. An economic geography dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity 27

    2015

  28. [28]

    Dario Diodato and Anet B. R. Weterings. The resilience of regional labour markets to economic shocks: Exploring the role of interactions among firms and workers.Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4):723–742, 2015

    2015

  29. [29]

    Glaeser, and William R

    Glenn Ellison, Edward L. Glaeser, and William R. Kerr. What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns.American Economic Review, 100(3):1195–1213, 2010

    2010

  30. [30]

    Marshallian sources of relatedness and their effects on firm survival and subsequent success in china.Economic Geography, 93(4):346–366, 2017

    Anthony Howell. Marshallian sources of relatedness and their effects on firm survival and subsequent success in china.Economic Geography, 93(4):346–366, 2017

    2017

  31. [31]

    Agglomeration, recombinant innovation and the role of market reforms in a transitioning china.Economics of innovation and new technology, 32(8):1235–1248, 2023

    Anthony Howell, Robin Guohuibin Li, Maryann Feldman, and Haifeng Qian. Agglomeration, recombinant innovation and the role of market reforms in a transitioning china.Economics of innovation and new technology, 32(8):1235–1248, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Ron Boschma, Joan Crespo, and David L. Rigby. Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9):1252–1268, 2019

    2019

  33. [33]

    Lane, and Dani Rodrik

    Réka Juhász, Nathan J. Lane, and Dani Rodrik. The new economics of industrial policy. Annual Review of Economics, 16:213–242, 2024

    2024

  34. [34]

    revealed

    Bela Balassa. Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage.The Manchester School, 33(2):99–123, 1965

    1965

  35. [35]

    Doyne Farmer, and Alexander Teytelboym

    Penny Mealy, J. Doyne Farmer, and Alexander Teytelboym. Interpreting economic complexity. Science Advances, 5(1):eaau1705, 2019

    2019

  36. [36]

    A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity.Scientific Re- ports, 2:723, 2012

    Andrea Tacchella, Matthieu Cristelli, Guido Caldarelli, Andrea Gabrielli, and Luciano Pietronero. A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity.Scientific Re- ports, 2:723, 2012

    2012

  37. [37]

    Bureau of Labor Statistics

    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Job openings and labor turnover survey (jolts). https: //www.bls.gov/jlt/, 2024. An economic geography dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity 28 Appendix An economic geography dataset of U.S. skill specialization, relatedness, and complexity 29 Table A1: Summary of released county-year variable g...

    2024