pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05362 · v3 · pith:2UZJEVMEnew · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌀 gr-qc

Constraining Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee gravity with extreme mass-ratio inspirals

Sheng Long , Zhong-wu Xia , Huajie Gong , Zhoujian Cao , Qiyuan Pan , Jiliang Jing This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 23:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords extreme mass-ratio inspiralsbumblebee gravityLorentz symmetry breakinggravitational wave astronomyLISABayesian parameter estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Extreme mass-ratio inspirals can constrain the Lorentz symmetry breaking parameter in bumblebee gravity to an uncertainty of order 10^{-4} using LISA.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how extreme mass-ratio inspirals evolve in a Schwarzschild-like spacetime modified by bumblebee gravity, where a dimensionless parameter ℓ quantifies the strength of Lorentz symmetry breaking. It constructs waveforms inside the augmented analytic kludge model after inserting the altered orbital frequencies and energy fluxes that arise from the modified spacetime. The resulting signals diverge from general-relativity waveforms, with the size of the difference increasing both with ℓ and with orbital eccentricity. Bayesian recovery of simulated LISA signals shows that all source parameters, including ℓ itself, are retrieved inside their 1σ intervals, indicating that the data can bound ℓ at the stated precision.

Core claim

In bumblebee gravity a Schwarzschild-like black hole is described by the dimensionless Lorentz symmetry breaking parameter ℓ. Waveforms for extreme mass-ratio inspirals are generated inside the augmented analytic kludge framework once the orbital frequencies and fluxes have been recomputed for the bumblebee metric. These waveforms differ from their general-relativity counterparts in a way that grows with ℓ and with eccentricity. When the modified signals are analysed with Bayesian methods, every injected parameter—including ℓ—is recovered inside its 1σ credible interval, and the uncertainty on ℓ reaches O(10^{-4}).

What carries the argument

Modified orbital frequencies and fluxes inserted into the augmented analytic kludge waveform model for the bumblebee spacetime.

If this is right

  • Deviations from general-relativity waveforms grow with increasing ℓ and are stronger for eccentric orbits.
  • All injected source parameters, including ℓ, are recovered inside their 1σ credible intervals.
  • LISA observations can therefore place a bound on ℓ at the level of O(10^{-4}).

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same waveform modification technique could be applied to other modified-gravity spacetimes that alter orbital frequencies and fluxes.
  • Tighter bounds on ℓ might be obtained by stacking multiple extreme mass-ratio inspirals or by combining LISA data with other gravitational-wave detectors.
  • If a nonzero ℓ is detected, it would constitute direct evidence of Lorentz symmetry violation in the strong-field regime.

Load-bearing premise

The augmented analytic kludge model with the adjusted frequencies and fluxes accurately reproduces the true gravitational-wave signal emitted in bumblebee gravity.

What would settle it

A LISA observation of an extreme mass-ratio inspiral whose waveform, when fitted with the bumblebee model, yields a posterior width for ℓ larger than O(10^{-4}) or centered far from the injected value.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05362 by Huajie Gong, Jiliang Jing, Qiyuan Pan, Sheng Long, Zhong-wu Xia, Zhoujian Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The plus polarization view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the mismatch between the reference waveform (ℓ = 0) and the modified waveform (ℓ ̸= 0) as a function of ℓ for three representative initial orbital parameters (p, e). We find that the mismatch increases monotonically as ℓ increases, indicating that the accumulated imprint of the bumblebee gravity on the EMRI waveform becomes progressively more significant for larger ℓ. For fixed initial semi-latus rec… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Corner plot of the marginalized posterior distributions for the intrinsic parameter set (ln view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extreme mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs), with their long-lived and highly relativistic orbital evolution, can probe strong-field spacetime geometry and provide an important means to test general relativity. In this work, we investigate EMRI waveforms in a Schwarzschild-like black hole spacetime arising in bumblebee gravity, where Lorentz symmetry breaking (LSB) is characterized by a dimensionless parameter $\ell$. We construct EMRI waveforms within the Augmented Analytic Kludge (AAK) framework using the modified orbital frequencies and fluxes. We find that $\ell$ significantly affects the orbital evolution and thereby modifies the waveform. These modifications grow with increasing $\ell$ and are further enhanced for more eccentric orbits. Furthermore, using Bayesian analysis, we obtain the posterior distributions of EMRI with the parameter $\ell$ included. Our results show that all injected source parameters are recovered within their $1\,\sigma$ credible intervals. We find that the bumblebee parameter $\ell$ can be constrained with an uncertainty of order $\mathcal{O}(10^{-4})$ by LISA.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that extreme mass-ratio inspirals in a Schwarzschild-like bumblebee spacetime can be modeled by modifying orbital frequencies and energy fluxes within the Augmented Analytic Kludge (AAK) framework, that these modifications alter the waveform in a manner that grows with ℓ and eccentricity, and that Bayesian recovery on LISA-simulated data recovers all injected parameters within 1σ while constraining the Lorentz-breaking parameter ℓ to an uncertainty of order O(10^{-4}).

Significance. If the modified AAK model accurately captures the bumblebee waveform, the work would provide a concrete forecast for how LISA EMRIs could bound Lorentz violation in the strong-field regime, complementing existing weak-field and cosmological tests. The use of Bayesian inference on simulated data follows standard practice in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that ℓ can be constrained at O(10^{-4}) rests on the assumption that rescaling only the orbital frequencies and energy fluxes inside the AAK framework is sufficient to represent the full bumblebee waveform. No cross-check against an independent calculation (e.g., geodesic motion or Teukolsky-like perturbation on the bumblebee metric) is reported, leaving the model error unquantified and directly affecting the quoted uncertainty.
  2. [Abstract] The Bayesian recovery statement (“all injected source parameters are recovered within their 1σ credible intervals”) is presented without any reported details on prior choices, sampler settings, or tests for model mismatch between the injected and recovery waveforms; this information is required to assess whether the posterior width on ℓ is robust or an artifact of the shared AAK approximation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the referee's careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that ℓ can be constrained at O(10^{-4}) rests on the assumption that rescaling only the orbital frequencies and energy fluxes inside the AAK framework is sufficient to represent the full bumblebee waveform. No cross-check against an independent calculation (e.g., geodesic motion or Teukolsky-like perturbation on the bumblebee metric) is reported, leaving the model error unquantified and directly affecting the quoted uncertainty.

    Authors: The AAK framework is an established approximation even in GR, and our modifications incorporate the exact analytic changes to orbital frequencies and energy fluxes derived from the bumblebee metric geodesics. A full Teukolsky perturbation on the bumblebee background is not available in the literature and lies outside the scope of this work. In revision we will add an explicit discussion of the approximation's domain of validity for small ℓ, including an order-of-magnitude estimate of neglected higher-order effects, thereby qualifying the quoted uncertainty without altering the central result. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The Bayesian recovery statement (“all injected source parameters are recovered within their 1σ credible intervals”) is presented without any reported details on prior choices, sampler settings, or tests for model mismatch between the injected and recovery waveforms; this information is required to assess whether the posterior width on ℓ is robust or an artifact of the shared AAK approximation.

    Authors: We agree that these implementation details are required for assessing robustness. The full manuscript describes the Bayesian pipeline, but we will expand the methods section (and add an appendix if needed) to specify the prior ranges, MCMC sampler settings, convergence diagnostics, and a dedicated model-mismatch test (injecting with ℓ=0 and recovering with the bumblebee model). These additions will confirm that the reported O(10^{-4}) uncertainty on ℓ is not an artifact of the shared approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard injection-recovery forecast on modified AAK model

full rationale

The paper derives modified orbital frequencies and fluxes for the bumblebee metric, inserts them into the existing AAK waveform framework, generates simulated signals, and performs Bayesian recovery of ℓ (and other parameters) from those signals. This is a conventional forecast of measurement precision under the model's assumptions and does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps in the provided text equate a derived quantity to a fitted input or rename a known result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated beyond the single parameter ell whose effect is being quantified.

free parameters (1)
  • ell
    Dimensionless Lorentz symmetry breaking parameter whose posterior is obtained from Bayesian analysis of simulated EMRI data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5730 in / 1134 out tokens · 21624 ms · 2026-06-30T23:13:50.493020+00:00 · methodology

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Wadekar, J

    D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, A. K. Mehta, B. Zackay, J. Mushkin, S. Olsen, and M. Zaldarriaga, (2023), arXiv:2312.06631 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    A. K. Mehta, S. Olsen, D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D111, 024049 (2025), arXiv:2311.06061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Olsen, T

    S. Olsen, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, J. Roulet, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D106, 043009 (2022), arXiv:2201.02252 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    A. H. Nitz, S. Kumar, Y.-F. Wang, S. Kastha, S. Wu, M. Sch¨ afer, R. Dhurkunde, and C. D. Capano, Astrophys. J.946, 59 (2023), arXiv:2112.06878 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Punturoet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 194002 (2010)

    M. Punturoet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  12. [12]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evanset al., (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Kalogera et al

    V. Kalogeraet al., (2021), arXiv:2111.06990 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitzeet al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    N. Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group), Living Rev. Rel.28, 9 (2025), arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Wuet al.(Taiji Scientific), Commun

    Y.-L. Wuet al.(Taiji Scientific), Commun. Phys.4, 34 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    L. S. Finn and K. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D62, 124021 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0007074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    C. P. L. Berry, R. H. Cole, P. Ca˜ nizares, and J. R. Gair, Phys. Rev. D94, 124042 (2016), arXiv:1608.08951 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Ye, H.-M

    C.-Q. Ye, H.-M. Fan, A. Torres-Orjuela, J.-d. Zhang, and Y.-M. Hu, Phys. Rev. D109, 124034 (2024), arXiv:2310.03520 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    G. Fu, Y. Liu, B. Wang, J.-P. Wu, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D111, 084066 (2025), arXiv:2409.08138 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    On the orientation and magnitude of the black hole spin in galactic nuclei

    M. Dotti, M. Colpi, S. Pallini, A. Perego, and M. Volonteri, Astrophys. J.762, 68 (2013), arXiv:1211.4871 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

    L. Baracket al., Class. Quant. Grav.36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    X-MRIs: Extremely Large Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    P. Amaro-Seoane, Phys. Rev. D99, 123025 (2019), arXiv:1903.10871 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Vazquez-Aceves, Y

    V. Vazquez-Aceves, Y. Lin, and A. Torres-Orjuela, Astrophys. J.952, 139 (2023), arXiv:2206.14399 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Constraint on massive vector field with extreme-mass-ratio inspirals around a slowly rotating black hole,

    T. Zi, P.-C. Li, B.-M. Gu, and F.-W. Shu, (2025), arXiv:2511.18435 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    X. Zou, X. Zhong, W.-B. Han, and S. D. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. D112, 084075 (2025), arXiv:2506.21955 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Zi and C.-Q

    T. Zi and C.-Q. Ye, (2025), arXiv:2512.21186 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Boson Stars in Bumblebee Gravity and Their Gravitational Waveforms from Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    M.-J. Liu, L.-X. Huang, Y.-Q. Wang, and K. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2512.19581 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    K. Meng, J. Zhao, M. Deng, C. Li, and N. Yang, Phys. Lett. B868, 139630 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    L. Zhao, M. Tang, and Z. Xu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 980 (2025), arXiv:2506.04971 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    H.-M. Fan, A. Torres-Orjuela, V. V´ azquez-Aceves, T.-X. Wang, and T.-F. Feng, (2025), arXiv:2511.08221 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    H. Guo, Y. Liu, C. Zhang, Y. Gong, W.-L. Qian, and R.-H. Yue, Phys. Rev. D106, 024047 (2022), arXiv:2201.10748 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Lianget al., Chin

    B. Lianget al., Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 081101 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, Living Rev. Rel.16, 7 (2013), arXiv:1212.5575 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Gravitational wave signatures and periodic orbits of a charged black hole in a Hernquist dark matter halo

    N. Heidari, A. A. Araujo Filho, and I. P. Lobo, (2026), arXiv:2604.11863 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    K. Meng, H. Zhang, X.-L. Fan, Y. Yong, and F. Du, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 252 (2026), arXiv:2405.07113 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Assessing EMRI Detectability of the Rotating Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder Black Hole

    D. Zhang, S. Li, G. Fu, and J.-P. Wu, (2026), arXiv:2604.23163 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Quantum Spacetime Phenomenology

    G. Amelino-Camelia, Living Rev. Rel.16, 5 (2013), arXiv:0806.0339 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D39, 683 (1989)

    1989

  44. [44]

    Tests of Lorentz invariance: a 2013 update

    S. Liberati, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 133001 (2013), arXiv:1304.5795 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [45]

    Modern tests of Lorentz invariance

    D. Mattingly, Living Rev. Rel.8, 5 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0502097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D69, 105009 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0312310

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  47. [47]

    Lorentz-Violating Extension of the Standard Model

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9809521

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  48. [48]

    W. Liu, X. Fang, J. Jing, and J. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 83 (2023), arXiv:2211.03156 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    W. Liu, C. Wen, and J. Wang, JHEP01, 184, arXiv:2410.21681 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    X. Liu, W. Liu, Z. Liu, and J. Wang, JHEP08, 094, arXiv:2503.06404 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    W. Liu, X. Fang, J. Jing, and J. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 280413 (2024), arXiv:2402.09686 [gr-qc]. 11

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    W. Deng, W. Liu, F. Long, K. Xiao, and J. Jing, JCAP11, 028, arXiv:2507.13978 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    A. A. A. Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, and P. J. Porf´ ırio, Phys. Rev. D108, 085010 (2023), arXiv:2211.11821 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, and P. J. Porf´ ırio, JCAP07, 004, arXiv:2402.13014 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, Y. Shi, and F. S. N. Lobo, Annals Phys.490, 170487 (2026), arXiv:2509.17867 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, and V. B. Bezerra, Annals Phys.489, 170469 (2026), arXiv:2511.12839 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Shi and A

    Y. Shi and A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, JCAP11, 045, arXiv:2505.02290 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D40, 1886 (1989)

    1989

  59. [59]

    Spontaneous Lorentz Violation, Nambu-Goldstone Modes, and Gravity

    R. Bluhm and V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D71, 065008 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0412320

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  60. [60]

    Q. Qi, Y. Sang, and X.-M. Kuang, (2026), arXiv:2601.06491 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Poisson, in17th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation(2004) pp

    E. Poisson, in17th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation(2004) pp. 119–141, arXiv:gr- qc/0410127

    work page arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    R. M. Wald, Fundam. Theor. Phys.162, 253 (2011), arXiv:0907.0412 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011), arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [65]

    Wei, X.-L

    Y.-X. Wei, X.-L. Zhu, J.-d. Zhang, and J. Mei, Phys. Rev. D112, 064048 (2025), arXiv:2504.09640 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Gong, X. Lu, and W. Zhou, (2026), arXiv:2603.27284 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    "Kludge" gravitational waveforms for a test-body orbiting a Kerr black hole

    S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D75, 024005 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 77, 04990 (2008)], arXiv:gr-qc/0607007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  68. [68]

    LISA Capture Sources: Approximate Waveforms, Signal-to-Noise Ratios, and Parameter Estimation Accuracy

    L. Barack and C. Cutler, Phys. Rev. D69, 082005 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310125

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  69. [69]

    A. J. K. Chua and J. R. Gair, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 232002 (2015), arXiv:1510.06245 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    A. J. K. Chua, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.716, 012028 (2016), arXiv:1602.00620 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    Gravitational waves from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals around a hairy Kerr black hole,

    T. Zi and P.-C. Li, Phys. Rev. D108, 084001 (2023), arXiv:2306.02683 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    T. Zi, Z. Zhou, H.-T. Wang, P.-C. Li, J.-d. Zhang, and B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D107, 023005 (2023), arXiv:2205.00425 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Zhang, C

    D. Zhang, C. Zhang, Q. Pan, G. Fu, and J.-P. Wu, (2026), arXiv:2602.07436 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Zhang and Y

    C. Zhang and Y. Gong, Phys. Rev. D110, 104052 (2024), arXiv:2407.07449 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Gravitational waves from eccentric extreme mass-ratio inspirals as probes of scalar fields,

    C. Zhang, Y. Gong, D. Liang, and B. Wang, JCAP06, 054, arXiv:2210.11121 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D104, 064047 (2021), arXiv:2104.04582 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    A. J. K. Chua, M. L. Katz, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 051102 (2021), arXiv:2008.06071 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Speri, M

    L. Speri, M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J. E. Thompson, C. E. A. Chapman-Bird, and J. R. Gair, Front. Appl. Math. Stat.9, 10.3389/fams.2023.1266739 (2024), arXiv:2307.12585 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.3389/fams.2023.1266739 2023

  79. [79]

    C. E. A. Chapman-Birdet al., (2025), arXiv:2506.09470 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit, (bhptoolkit.org)

Showing first 80 references.