pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31102 · v1 · pith:PFSYIOQ2new · submitted 2026-06-30 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Translation Readiness Index: Measuring Patent-Paper Proximity from Scientific Publication Text

Paul X. McCarthy , Rasika Amarasiri , Xian Gong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 03:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords Translation Readiness Indexpatent-paper pairsSPECTER2 embeddingsXGBoost classifiertranslational researchscientific publicationssemantic similaritymachine learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Translation Readiness Index scores a paper's semantic similarity to patented research from its title and abstract alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Universities, funders, and policy makers want to spot research likely to translate into patents or industry use before those outcomes are visible. The paper trains an XGBoost classifier on SPECTER2 embeddings of titles and abstracts drawn from known patent-paper pairs versus matched control papers. TRI is then defined as the model's predicted probability that a new publication belongs to the paired class. External checks on University of Western Australia publications and leading global universities show that higher TRI scores align with independent markers of translation such as patents and collaborations. The result supplies a scalable, text-only signal of translational proximity rather than a direct forecast of commercialization.

Core claim

TRI is the XGBoost-estimated probability that a publication's 768-dimensional SPECTER2 embedding matches the class of papers appearing in high-confidence patent-paper pairs; the classifier reaches 0.77 ROC-AUC on held-out data, patent-paired papers exhibit more invention-oriented language, and TRI values correlate positively with separate translational indicators across multiple university datasets.

What carries the argument

The Translation Readiness Index (TRI), the output probability of an XGBoost classifier trained to separate SPECTER2 embeddings of patent-paired papers from matched non-paired controls.

If this is right

  • Patent-paired papers are distinguished by invention-oriented phrasing rather than observational language.
  • High TRI scores associate with higher rates of patents, licenses, and collaborations in external university data.
  • The index can be computed for any new publication using only its title and abstract.
  • TRI supplies an early, pre-patent signal for evaluating research portfolios at scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Aggregate TRI scores across an institution's output could serve as a leading indicator for national research translation performance.
  • The same embedding-plus-classifier pipeline could be retrained on other outcome labels such as startup formation or clinical trials.
  • Funders might integrate TRI into grant review to surface proposals whose framing already resembles patented work.

Load-bearing premise

Semantic patterns learned from existing patent-paper pairs will continue to mark translational relevance in future publications whose content was not seen during training.

What would settle it

A prospective test in which new publications receive TRI scores and are later tracked for actual patent filings, licenses, or industry collaborations; absence of positive correlation between high TRI and those later events would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

Universities, funders, investors, and policy agencies often need to identify research with translational relevance before patents, licenses, startups, or industry collaborations are visible. This study introduces the Translation Readiness Index (TRI), a text-based measure evaluating a publication's semantic similarity to papers that appear in high-confidence patent-paper pairs. Using 20,610 publications from OpenAlex, including 9,431 publications from the Reliance on Science patent-paper pairs data and 11,179 matched comparison publications, we created paper-level 768-dimensional semantic embeddings from titles and abstracts with SPECTER2. After evaluating four machine learning classifiers, XGBoost achieved the highest ROC-AUC (0.77). We define TRI as the model-estimated probability that a publication belongs to the patent-paper-paired class. Linguistic analysis revealed that patent-paired publications more often use an invention-oriented framing, distinct from the observational language of the comparison group. External validation across University of Western Australia (UWA) publications and leading global universities demonstrated positive associations between high TRI scores and independent translational indicators. TRI provides a text-based method for identifying translation-ready research, though it should be interpreted as a measure of semantic proximity to patented science rather than a direct measure of realized commercialization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Translation Readiness Index (TRI), a machine learning-derived score representing the probability that a scientific publication's title and abstract are semantically similar to those in patent-paper pairs. Using SPECTER2 embeddings and an XGBoost classifier trained on 9,431 Reliance on Science patent-paired publications and 11,179 matched controls, the model achieves an ROC-AUC of 0.77. The paper reports linguistic differences in framing and positive associations with translational indicators in external validations on University of Western Australia publications and leading global universities. TRI is presented as a text-based tool for identifying research with translational potential.

Significance. If the TRI generalizes, it offers a scalable text-only method to flag publications with potential translational relevance before patents or other outcomes appear, which could support university technology transfer offices, funders, and policy analysis. The use of SPECTER2 embeddings, comparison to multiple classifiers, and external validation on independent university corpora are positive features. Significance is limited by the preliminary nature of the generalization evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Data section] Abstract and Data section: The procedure used to select and match the 11,179 comparison publications (including any field, year, or institution controls) is not described; this is load-bearing for the central claim because imbalances in the training data could allow the XGBoost model to exploit artifacts rather than learn genuine semantic proximity to patent-paired papers.
  2. [Methods] Methods: No information is provided on hyperparameter tuning, the cross-validation strategy, or explicit checks for temporal, field, or institutional leakage in the SPECTER2 embeddings or classifier training; without these, the ROC-AUC of 0.77 cannot be interpreted as support for out-of-distribution generalization to new publications.
  3. [External Validation section] External Validation section: The reported positive associations with translational indicators on UWA and global university data do not include details on the specific indicators, sample construction, statistical controls, or ablation tests separating invention-oriented language from other signals; this leaves open whether the associations reflect genuine translational proximity or residual confounding.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The four classifiers evaluated are not named and only XGBoost performance is reported; adding the full comparison table would improve transparency without altering the main results.
  2. [Linguistic analysis] Linguistic analysis: The claim of distinct invention-oriented framing is stated but not supported by quantitative metrics or example phrases from the patent-paired versus control texts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which identify key areas where additional methodological transparency is required. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Data section] Abstract and Data section: The procedure used to select and match the 11,179 comparison publications (including any field, year, or institution controls) is not described; this is load-bearing for the central claim because imbalances in the training data could allow the XGBoost model to exploit artifacts rather than learn genuine semantic proximity to patent-paired papers.

    Authors: We agree that the matching procedure must be fully specified to support the central claim. The current manuscript notes only that the 11,179 publications are 'matched comparison publications' drawn from OpenAlex but does not detail the criteria. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection describing the matching algorithm, including the exact variables used for field (OpenAlex field-of-study), year, and institution controls, the matching ratio, and any caliper or exact-match rules applied. This addition will allow readers to assess whether the classifier is capturing semantic proximity rather than data artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods: No information is provided on hyperparameter tuning, the cross-validation strategy, or explicit checks for temporal, field, or institutional leakage in the SPECTER2 embeddings or classifier training; without these, the ROC-AUC of 0.77 cannot be interpreted as support for out-of-distribution generalization to new publications.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the Methods section omits these implementation details. The revised manuscript will include: (i) the hyperparameter search procedure and final values for the XGBoost model, (ii) the cross-validation scheme (including number of folds and stratification), and (iii) explicit leakage-prevention steps such as temporal hold-out by publication year, field-level blocking, and institution-level separation between training and test sets. These additions will clarify the conditions under which the reported ROC-AUC supports generalization. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [External Validation section] External Validation section: The reported positive associations with translational indicators on UWA and global university data do not include details on the specific indicators, sample construction, statistical controls, or ablation tests separating invention-oriented language from other signals; this leaves open whether the associations reflect genuine translational proximity or residual confounding.

    Authors: We agree that the external-validation results require fuller documentation to rule out confounding. The revision will expand the section to specify: the exact translational indicators examined, the construction of the UWA and global-university samples, the statistical models and controls employed, and any ablation analyses that isolate invention-oriented framing from other textual features. These additions will strengthen the evidence that the observed associations reflect semantic proximity to patent-paired science. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: TRI explicitly defined as classifier output on held training distribution; external validation independent

full rationale

The paper defines TRI directly as the XGBoost probability output on SPECTER2 embeddings, trained to separate the 9,431 Reliance on Science patent-paper pairs from matched controls. This is a supervised similarity measure by construction, not a derived prediction claimed to emerge from independent first principles. External associations are reported on separate UWA and global-university corpora using independent translational indicators, providing non-circular grounding. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is load-bearing. The central claim reduces to a standard ML proximity score plus out-of-sample correlation checks, with no step where the reported result equals its training inputs by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that Reliance on Science patent-paper pairs constitute high-confidence positive examples of translational science and that the matched comparison set is unbiased. The TRI itself is a derived quantity whose value is produced by parameters fitted to the training labels.

free parameters (1)
  • XGBoost model parameters
    All classifier weights and hyperparameters are fitted to the 20,610-publication training set to produce the reported ROC-AUC; these parameters directly determine every TRI score.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Patent-paper pairs from the Reliance on Science dataset are reliable indicators of translational relevance.
    Used to label the positive class for supervised training.
  • domain assumption SPECTER2 embeddings of titles and abstracts capture the linguistic features relevant to translational readiness.
    Foundation for the feature representation fed to the classifier.
invented entities (1)
  • Translation Readiness Index (TRI) no independent evidence
    purpose: Scalar probability score indicating semantic proximity to patent-paired publications.
    Constructed as the classifier output; no independent falsifiable prediction is supplied beyond the reported correlations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5753 in / 1456 out tokens · 64557 ms · 2026-07-01T03:10:59.355180+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references

  1. [1]

    \ Jones, B F

    ahmadpoor2017dual APACrefauthors Ahmadpoor, M. \ Jones, B F. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance . Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 357 6351 583-587

    2017

  2. [2]

    , Belenzon, S

    arora2023effect APACrefauthors Arora, A. , Belenzon, S. , Cioaca, L C. , Sheer, L. \ Hansen, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . The Effect of Public Science on Corporate R&D The effect of public science on corporate r&d . NBER Working Paper Series

    2023

  3. [3]

    , Porter, A L

    arora2013capturing APACrefauthors Arora, S K. , Porter, A L. , Youtie, J. \ Shapira, P. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology rese...

    2013

  4. [4]

    , Breschi, S

    balconi2004networks APACrefauthors Balconi, M. , Breschi, S. \ Lissoni, F. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of italian patent data . Research policy 33 1 127-145

    2004

  5. [5]

    beltagy2019scibert APACrefauthors Beltagy, I. , Lo, K. \ Cohan, A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text Scibert: A pretrained language model for scientific text . Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical ...

    2019

  6. [6]

    , Hudson, D A

    bommasani2021foundation APACrefauthors Bommasani, R. , Hudson, D A. , Altman, R. , Arora, S. , Bernstein, M S. , Bohg, J. Liang, P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models On the opportunities and risks of foundation models

    2021

  7. [7]

    APACrefauthors \ 2013

    bornmann2013societal APACrefauthors Bornmann, L. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 2 217-233

    2013

  8. [8]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001

    breiman2001random APACrefauthors Breiman, L. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Random Forests Random forests . Machine learning 45 1 5-32

    2001

  9. [9]

    APACrefauthors \ 1960

    bush1960science APACrefauthors Bush, V. APACrefauthors \ 1960 . Science, the endless frontier; a report to the President on a program for postwar scientific research Science, the endless frontier; a report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research . Washington National Science Foundation

    1960

  10. [10]

    \ Guestrin, C

    chen2016xgboost APACrefauthors Chen, T. \ Guestrin, C. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system . Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data min...

    2016

  11. [11]

    , Feldman, S

    cohan2020specter APACrefauthors Cohan, A. , Feldman, S. , Beltagy, I. , Downey, D. \ Weld, D S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers Specter: Document-level representation learning using citation-informed transformers

    2020

  12. [12]

    , Nelson, R R

    cohen2002links APACrefauthors Cohen, W M. , Nelson, R R. \ Walsh, J P. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial r&d . Management science 48 1 1-23

    2002

  13. [13]

    , Crow, M

    colyvas2002university APACrefauthors Colyvas, J. , Crow, M. , Gelijns, A. , Mazzoleni, R. , Nelson, R R. , Rosenberg, N. \ Sampat, B N. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? How do university inventions get into practice? Management science 48 1 61-72

    2002

  14. [14]

    , Chang, M W

    devlin2018bert APACrefauthors Devlin, J. , Chang, M W. , Lee, K. \ Toutanova, K. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding

    2018

  15. [15]

    \ Sorenson, O

    fleming2004science APACrefauthors Fleming, L. \ Sorenson, O. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Science as a map in technological search Science as a map in technological search . Strategic management journal 25 8-9 909-928

    2004

  16. [16]

    , Bergstrom, C T

    fortunato2018science APACrefauthors Fortunato, S. , Bergstrom, C T. , Börner, K. , Evans, J A. , Helbing, D. , Milojević, S. Barabási, A L. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Science of science Science of science . Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 359 6379

    2018

  17. [17]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001

    friedman2001gradient APACrefauthors Friedman, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine . The Annals of statistics 29 5 1189-1232

    2001

  18. [18]

    , Porter, M E

    furman2002determinants APACrefauthors Furman, J L. , Porter, M E. \ Stern, S. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . The determinants of national innovative capacity The determinants of national innovative capacity . Research policy 31 6 899-933

    2002

  19. [19]

    \ Nesta, L J

    geuna2006university APACrefauthors Geuna, A. \ Nesta, L J. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging european evidence . Research policy 35 6 790-807

    2006

  20. [20]

    , McCarthy, P X

    gong2025cosmos APACrefauthors Gong, X. , McCarthy, P X. , Griffith, C. , McFarland, C. \ Rizoiu, M A. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Cosmos 1.0: a multidimensional map of the emerging technology frontier Cosmos 1.0: a multidimensional map of the emerging technology frontier . Scientific data 12 1 1837-17

    2025

  21. [21]

    , Green, L

    grant2003basic APACrefauthors Grant, J. , Green, L. \ Mason, B. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science . Research evaluation 12 3 217-224

    2003

  22. [22]

    APACrefauthors \ 1990

    griliches1990patent APACrefauthors Griliches, Z. APACrefauthors \ 1990 . Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey . Journal of economic literature 28 4 1661-1707

    1990

  23. [23]

    , Jaffe, A

    hall2005market APACrefauthors Hall, B H. , Jaffe, A. \ Trajtenberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Market Value and Patent Citations Market value and patent citations . The Rand journal of economics 36 1 16-38

    2005

  24. [24]

    , Scherer, F M

    harhoff2003citations APACrefauthors Harhoff, D. , Scherer, F M. \ Vopel, K. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights . Research policy 32 8 1343-1363

    2003

  25. [25]

    , Jaffe, A B

    henderson1998universities APACrefauthors Henderson, R. , Jaffe, A B. \ Trajtenberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988 Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988 . The review of economics and stat...

    1998

  26. [26]

    APACrefauthors \ 1989

    jaffe1989real APACrefauthors Jaffe, A B. APACrefauthors \ 1989 . Real Effects of Academic Research Real effects of academic research . The American economic review 79 5 957-970

    1989

  27. [27]

    , Trajtenberg, M

    jaffe1993geographic APACrefauthors Jaffe, A B. , Trajtenberg, M. \ Henderson, R. APACrefauthors \ 1993 . Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations . The Quarterly journal of economics 108 3 577-598

    1993

  28. [28]

    \ Rosenberg, N

    kline2009overview APACrefauthors Kline, S J. \ Rosenberg, N. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . An Overview of Innovation An overview of innovation . Studies On Science And The Innovation Process Studies on science and the innovation process \ ( 173-203). World Scientific

    2009

  29. [29]

    , Phan, P H

    markman2005entrepreneurship APACrefauthors Markman, G D. , Phan, P H. , Balkin, D B. \ Gianiodis, P T. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer . Journal of business venturing 20 2 241-263

    2005

  30. [30]

    \ Fuegi, A

    marx2020reliance APACrefauthors Marx, M. \ Fuegi, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles . Strategic management journal 41 9 1572-1594

    2020

  31. [31]

    , Hasan, S

    masclans2025compot APACrefauthors Masclans, R. , Hasan, S. \ Cohen, W M. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Measuring the commercial potential of science Measuring the commercial potential of science . Strategic management journal 46 9 2199-2236

    2025

  32. [32]

    APACrefauthors \ 1997

    mitchell1997machine APACrefauthors Mitchell, T M. APACrefauthors \ 1997 . Does Machine Learning Really Work? Does machine learning really work? The AI magazine 18 3 11-20

    1997

  33. [33]

    \ Mowery, D C

    mowery2004ivory APACrefauthors Mowery, D C. \ Mowery, D C. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the bayh-dole act in the united states \ ...

    2004

  34. [34]

    , Hamilton, K S

    narin1997increasing APACrefauthors Narin, F. , Hamilton, K S. \ Olivastro, D. APACrefauthors \ 1997 . The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science The increasing linkage between u.s. technology and public science . Research policy 26 3 317-330

    1997

  35. [35]

    APACrefauthors \ 1959

    nelson1959simple APACrefauthors Nelson, R R. APACrefauthors \ 1959 . The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research The simple economics of basic scientific research . The Journal of political economy 67 3 297-306

    1959

  36. [36]

    APACrefauthors \ 1993

    nelson1993national APACrefauthors Nelson, R R. APACrefauthors \ 1993 . National innovation systems : a comparative analysis National innovation systems : a comparative analysis . New York Oxford University Press

    1993

  37. [37]

    , Varoquaux, G

    pedregosa2011scikit APACrefauthors Pedregosa, F. , Varoquaux, G. , Gramfort, A. , Michel, V. , Thirion, B. , Grisel, O. Duchesnay, E. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python . Journal of machine learning research

    2011

  38. [38]

    , Tartari, V

    perkmann2013academic APACrefauthors Perkmann, M. , Tartari, V. , McKelvey, M. , Autio, E. , Broström, A. , D’Este, P. Sobrero, M. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relatio...

    2013

  39. [39]

    \ Cunningham, S W

    porter2005tech APACrefauthors Porter, A L. \ Cunningham, S W. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Tech mining : exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage Tech mining : exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage \ ( 1st ed. \ ). Hoboken, N.J Wiley

    2005

  40. [40]

    \ Buckley, C

    salton1988term APACrefauthors Salton, G. \ Buckley, C. APACrefauthors \ 1988 . Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval . Information processing & management 24 5 513-523

    1988

  41. [41]

    federal2019science Science of Science—Discovery, Communication, and Impact (NSF) Science of science—discovery, communication, and impact (nsf) . 2019 . Federal grants & contracts 43 22 3-3

    2019

  42. [42]

    APACrefauthors \ 2004

    shane2004academic APACrefauthors Shane, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Academic entrepreneurship : university spinoffs and wealth creation Academic entrepreneurship : university spinoffs and wealth creation . Northampton, MA Edward Elgar

    2004

  43. [43]

    , Waldman, D A

    siegel2003commercial APACrefauthors Siegel, D S. , Waldman, D A. , Atwater, L E. \ Link, A N. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry colla...

    2003

  44. [44]

    APACrefauthors \ 2023

    singh2023specter2 APACrefauthors Singh, A. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Specter2: Adapting scientific document embeddings to multiple fields and task formats. Specter2: Adapting scientific document embeddings to multiple fields and task formats. available at:https://allenai.org/blog/specter2-adapting-scientific-document-embeddings-to-multiplefields-and-task-fo...

    2023

  45. [45]

    APACrefauthors \ 1997

    stokes1997pasteur APACrefauthors Stokes, D E. APACrefauthors \ 1997 . Pasteur's quadrant : basic science and technological innovation Pasteur's quadrant : basic science and technological innovation . Washington, D.C Brookings Institution Press

    1997

  46. [46]

    APACrefauthors \ 1990

    trajtenberg1990penny APACrefauthors Trajtenberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 1990 . A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations . The Rand journal of economics 21 1 172-187

    1990

  47. [47]

    APACrefauthors \ 2014

    veugelers2014contribution APACrefauthors Veugelers, R. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . The contribution of academic research to innovation and growth The contribution of academic research to innovation and growth . IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc

    2014

  48. [48]

    \ Barab \'a si, A L

    wang2021science APACrefauthors Wang, D. \ Barab \'a si, A L. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . The Science of Science The science of science . Cambridge University Press

    2021

  49. [49]

    , Sugimoto, C R

    wouters2019rethinking APACrefauthors Wouters, P. , Sugimoto, C R. , Larivière, V. , McVeigh, M E. , Pulverer, B. , de Rijcke, S. \ Waltman, L. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal . Nature (London) 569 7758 621-623

    2019

  50. [50]

    Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles , volume =

    Marx, Matt and Fuegi, Aaron , address =. Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles , volume =. Strategic management journal , language =

  51. [51]

    Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , year =

    Pedregosa, Fabian and Varoquaux, Gaël and Gramfort, Alexandre and Michel, Vincent and Thirion, Bertrand and Grisel, Olivier and Blondel, Mathieu and Prettenhofer, Peter and Weiss, Ron and Dubourg, Vincent and Vanderplas, Jake and Passos, Alexandre and Cournapeau, David and Brucher, Matthieu and Perrot, Matthieu and Duchesnay, Edouard , copyright =. Scikit...

  52. [52]

    Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval , volume =

    Salton, Gerard and Buckley, Christopher , address =. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval , volume =. Information processing & management , language =

  53. [53]

    , address =

    Ahmadpoor, Mohammad and Jones, Benjamin F. , address =. The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance , volume =. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) , keywords =

  54. [54]

    Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data , volume =

    Balconi, Margherita and Breschi, Stefano and Lissoni, Francesco , address =. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data , volume =. Research policy , language =

  55. [55]

    Science, the endless frontier; a report to the President on a program for postwar scientific research , year =

    Bush, Vannevar , address =. Science, the endless frontier; a report to the President on a program for postwar scientific research , year =

  56. [56]

    SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers , year =

    Cohan, Arman and Feldman, Sergey and Beltagy, Iz and Downey, Doug and Weld, Daniel S , copyright =. SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers , year =

  57. [57]

    Specter2: Adapting scientific document embeddings to multiple fields and task formats , author=

  58. [58]

    Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , volume =

    Cohen, Wesley M and Nelson, Richard R and Walsh, John P , address =. Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , volume =. Management science , language =

  59. [59]

    Science as a map in technological search , volume =

    Fleming, Lee and Sorenson, Olav , address =. Science as a map in technological search , volume =. Strategic management journal , language =

  60. [60]

    and Börner, Katy and Evans, James A

    Fortunato, Santo and Bergstrom, Carl T. and Börner, Katy and Evans, James A. and Helbing, Dirk and Milojević, Staša and Petersen, Alexander M. and Radicchi, Filippo and Sinatra, Roberta and Uzzi, Brian and Vespignani, Alessandro and Waltman, Ludo and Wang, Dashun and Barabási, Albert-László , address =. Science of science , volume =. Science (American Ass...

  61. [61]

    Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey , volume =

    Griliches, Zvi , address =. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey , volume =. Journal of economic literature , language =

  62. [62]

    and Olivastro, Dominic , address =

    Narin, Francis and Hamilton, Kimberly S. and Olivastro, Dominic , address =. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , volume =. Research policy , language =

  63. [63]

    , address =

    Stokes, Donald E. , address =. Pasteur's quadrant : basic science and technological innovation , year =. Pasteur's quadrant : basic science and technological innovation , isbn =

  64. [64]

    , address =

    Nelson, Richard R. , address =. The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , volume =. The Journal of political economy , keywords =

  65. [65]

    and Rosenberg, Nathan , booktitle =

    Kline, Stephen J. and Rosenberg, Nathan , booktitle =. An Overview of Innovation , year =

  66. [66]

    , address =

    Jaffe, Adam B. , address =. Real Effects of Academic Research , volume =. The American economic review , language =

  67. [67]

    A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , volume =

    Trajtenberg, Manuel , address =. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , volume =. The Rand journal of economics , keywords =

  68. [68]

    Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights , volume =

    Harhoff, Dietmar and Scherer, Frederic M and Vopel, Katrin , address =. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights , volume =. Research policy , language =

  69. [69]

    How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , volume =

    Colyvas, Jeannette and Crow, Michael and Gelijns, Annetine and Mazzoleni, Roberto and Nelson, Richard R and Rosenberg, Nathan and Sampat, Bhaven N , address =. How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , volume =. Management science , language =

  70. [70]

    and Cunningham, Scott W

    Porter, Alan L. and Cunningham, Scott W. , address =. Tech mining : exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage , year =. Tech mining : exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage , edition =

  71. [71]

    and Porter, Alan L

    Arora, Sanjay K. and Porter, Alan L. and Youtie, Jan and Shapira, Philip , address =. Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs , volume =. Scientometrics , language =

  72. [72]

    and Trajtenberg, Manuel and Henderson, Rebecca , address =

    Jaffe, Adam B. and Trajtenberg, Manuel and Henderson, Rebecca , address =. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations , volume =. The Quarterly journal of economics , language =

  73. [73]

    and Trajtenberg, Manuel , address =

    Henderson, Rebecca and Jaffe, Adam B. and Trajtenberg, Manuel , address =. Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988 , volume =. The review of economics and statistics , language =

    1965

  74. [74]

    Federal grants & contracts , language =

    Science of Science—Discovery, Communication, and Impact (NSF) , volume =. Federal grants & contracts , language =

  75. [75]

    Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations , volume =

    Perkmann, Markus and Tartari, Valentina and McKelvey, Maureen and Autio, Erkko and Broström, Anders and D’Este, Pablo and Fini, Riccardo and Geuna, Aldo and Grimaldi, Rosa and Hughes, Alan and Krabel, Stefan and Kitson, Michael and Llerena, Patrick and Lissoni, Franceso and Salter, Ammon and Sobrero, Maurizio , address =. Academic engagement and commercia...

  76. [76]

    Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science , volume =

    Grant, Jonathan and Green, Liz and Mason, Barbara , copyright =. Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science , volume =. Research evaluation , language =

  77. [77]

    and Jaffe, Adam and Trajtenberg, Manuel , address =

    Hall, Bronwyn H. and Jaffe, Adam and Trajtenberg, Manuel , address =. Market Value and Patent Citations , volume =. The Rand journal of economics , language =

  78. [78]

    Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , volume =

    Siegel, Donald S and Waldman, David A and Atwater, Leanne E and Link, Albert N , address =. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , volume =. Journal of high technology management research , language =

  79. [79]

    and Phan, Phillip H

    Markman, Gideon D. and Phan, Phillip H. and Balkin, David B. and Gianiodis, Peter T. , address =. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , volume =. Journal of business venturing , language =

  80. [80]

    and Mowery, David C

    Mowery, David C. and Mowery, David C. , address =. Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , year =. Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , edition =

Showing first 80 references.