Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 79 references

Inspiraling stellar black hole pairs around a supermassive black hole can let space-based detectors measure the large hole's mass to relative precision of 10 to the minus 5 and its spin to a few percent.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 06:39 UTC pith:LWQVYRN7

load-bearing objection Fisher-matrix estimates suggest LISA can reach 10^{-5} relative precision on Kerr SMBH mass and orbit from orbiting BBH signals, but the result stands or falls on whether the PN-plus-moving-source waveform matches the actual Kerr geodesic signal closely enough. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.12784 v1 pith:LWQVYRN7 submitted 2026-06-11 gr-qc

Constraining Kerr supermassive black hole properties using gravitational waves from inspiraling stellar-mass binary black holes

Jie Wu , Jin-Tao Yao , Mengfei Sun , Jin Li , Zhoujian Cao This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavessupermassive black holesKerr spacetimeLISAbinary black holesFisher information matrixhierarchical triplespost-Newtonian waveforms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores whether future space-based gravitational wave detectors can determine the mass, spin, and orbital parameters of a supermassive black hole by listening to the gravitational waves from a much smaller black hole binary that orbits it. The authors model the motion of the small binary in the curved spacetime of a spinning supermassive black hole and generate the expected modulated signals using post-Newtonian waveforms combined with a moving-source transformation. They then apply the Fisher information matrix to LISA-like detector data to forecast how well the supermassive black hole properties can be recovered. The results indicate that for loud signals the mass and orbital elements reach relative uncertainties around 10 to the minus 5 while spin parameters are constrained to within a few percent, and that this would outperform existing electromagnetic measurements for an M87*-like system.

Core claim

By modeling binary black hole inspirals around a Kerr supermassive black hole and using the Fisher information matrix on LISA-like detector data, the SMBH mass and orbital parameters can be recovered with relative uncertainties of order 10^{-5} and the spin parameters to a few percent accuracy, yielding tighter bounds than electromagnetic observations for an M87*-like system.

What carries the argument

Fisher information matrix applied to post-Newtonian waveforms of the binary black hole with moving-source transformation in Kerr spacetime.

Load-bearing premise

The small binary must remain in a stable orbit around the supermassive black hole long enough for the signal to be observed, and the post-Newtonian waveform plus moving-source transformation must accurately describe the emitted gravitational waves.

What would settle it

A detected gravitational wave signal from a stellar-mass binary around an M87*-like supermassive black hole whose recovered spin uncertainty exceeds roughly 10 percent would show the forecasted precision does not hold.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The outer semimajor axis of the orbit around the supermassive black hole exerts the strongest influence on how precisely all parameters can be recovered.
  • The supermassive black hole spin magnitude and orientation uncertainties depend primarily on the values of the spin itself and the eccentricity.
  • For an M87*-like system, gravitational wave data would deliver tighter constraints on both mass and spin than current electromagnetic observations.
  • High signal-to-noise ratio events are required to reach the 10^{-5} level for mass and orbital parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If multiple such triple systems are observed, the method could be used to test whether the central object obeys the Kerr metric by checking consistency across events.
  • The same signals might also reveal the population and stability of stellar binaries in galactic nuclei, which is not addressed in the analysis.
  • Extending the calculation beyond the post-Newtonian approximation would be needed before applying the method to the strongest signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a study on using gravitational waves from stellar-mass binary black holes inspiraling around a supermassive Kerr black hole to constrain the SMBH's mass, spin, and orbital parameters. The analysis employs post-Newtonian waveforms with moving-source transformation for signals in hierarchical triple systems, estimates uncertainties via the Fisher information matrix for LISA-like detectors, and concludes that high-SNR events can achieve relative uncertainties of order 10^{-5} for mass and orbital parameters, few percent for spin, outperforming electromagnetic observations for systems like M87*.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the results highlight the potential of space-based GW detectors to provide precise measurements of SMBH properties, offering a complementary or superior probe to electromagnetic methods and advancing multi-messenger studies of black hole physics in galactic centers. The use of the Fisher matrix on a standard LISA configuration is a conventional and reproducible approach for forecasting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and waveform modeling section] Abstract and waveform modeling: The central precision claims (relative uncertainties of order 10^{-5} on SMBH mass/orbit and few-percent constraints on spin) rest on the post-Newtonian inner-binary waveform combined with moving-source transformation faithfully reproducing the modulated signal generated by geodesic motion in Kerr spacetime. No error budget or mismatch quantification against a more accurate outer-orbit model is supplied.
  2. [Application to M87*-like system] M87* application: The claim that GW observations provide more precise measurements of SMBH mass and spin than current electromagnetic observations for an M87*-like system assumes both waveform fidelity and the existence of stable hierarchical triples; without quantified stability criteria or systematic-error tests, this comparative conclusion is not load-bearing supported.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the exact definition and range of the outer semimajor axis parameter in the Fisher matrix setup to ensure reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We respond point by point to the major comments below, indicating planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and waveform modeling section] Abstract and waveform modeling: The central precision claims (relative uncertainties of order 10^{-5} on SMBH mass/orbit and few-percent constraints on spin) rest on the post-Newtonian inner-binary waveform combined with moving-source transformation faithfully reproducing the modulated signal generated by geodesic motion in Kerr spacetime. No error budget or mismatch quantification against a more accurate outer-orbit model is supplied.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit error budget or mismatch quantification would strengthen the central claims. The adopted post-Newtonian inner-binary waveform plus moving-source transformation is a standard approximation in the literature for hierarchical systems in the weak-field, slow-motion regime relevant to LISA forecasts. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the waveform modeling section that discusses the expected accuracy, including an order-of-magnitude estimate of truncation error based on the post-Newtonian parameter and the separation of inner/outer timescales, thereby supplying the requested error-budget discussion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to M87*-like system] M87* application: The claim that GW observations provide more precise measurements of SMBH mass and spin than current electromagnetic observations for an M87*-like system assumes both waveform fidelity and the existence of stable hierarchical triples; without quantified stability criteria or systematic-error tests, this comparative conclusion is not load-bearing supported.

    Authors: The M87* comparison is presented as an illustrative application rather than a definitive result. The manuscript already restricts attention to stable hierarchical triples, but does not supply new stability criteria. We will revise the relevant section to moderate the comparative language, explicitly state the stability assumption, and add references to existing analytic and numerical studies of hierarchical-triple stability in Kerr spacetime. We will also note the inherent limitation of the Fisher-matrix approach with respect to unmodeled systematic errors. These changes address the concern while remaining within the scope of a forecast study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; Fisher uncertainties computed from explicit waveform model

full rationale

The derivation uses an explicit post-Newtonian waveform plus moving-source transformation in Kerr spacetime, then applies the Fisher information matrix to obtain parameter covariances for assumed high-SNR signals. This is a forward calculation of expected measurement precision under the stated model assumptions; the output uncertainties are not equivalent to any fitted input by construction, nor do they rely on load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes imported from prior author work. The chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks (LISA configuration, PN waveform) and does not rename known results or smuggle uniqueness theorems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the central claim rests on standard assumptions in general relativity and gravitational wave modeling, with no new entities postulated. The modeling relies on post-Newtonian approximation and moving-source transformation, which are standard but introduce assumptions about waveform fidelity.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The spacetime around the supermassive black hole is described by the Kerr metric.
    Invoked in modeling the BBH motion in Kerr spacetime.
  • domain assumption The post-Newtonian approximation combined with moving-source transformation is sufficient for generating the modulated GW signals.
    Used in computing the signals for Fisher matrix analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5741 in / 1453 out tokens · 27765 ms · 2026-06-27T06:39:53.101226+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the capability of future space-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors to constrain supermassive black hole (SMBH) properties through observations of inspiraling stellar-mass binary black holes (BBHs) orbiting them. Focusing on stable hierarchical triple systems, we model the BBH motion in Kerr spacetime and compute the modulated GW signals using the post Newtonian waveform combined with moving-source transformation. Based on the LISA configuration and second-generation time delay interferometry technology, we estimate parameter uncertainties with the Fisher information matrix. Our results show that the outer semimajor axis has the strongest influence on parameter precision, while the SMBH spin and eccentricity mainly affect their own uncertainties. For high-SNR signals, the SMBH mass and orbital parameters can be measured with relative uncertainties on the order of $10^{-5}$, while the spin magnitude and its orientation can be constrained to within a few percentages. Applying the method to an M87*-like system, GW observations provide more precise measurements of the SMBH mass and spin compared with current electromagnetic observations, highlighting the potential of space-based GW astronomy to probe SMBH properties with high accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12784 by Jie Wu, Jin Li, Jin-Tao Yao, Mengfei Sun, Zhoujian Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of orbital elements and coordinate systems (not to scale). Panels (a) and (b) show the reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Variation of the outer semimajor axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The process of simulating GW signals and calculating constraint results. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Distributions of the relative uncertainties of SMBH parameters with respect to the outer orbital parameters. Panels (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation of the relative parameter uncertainties and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Relative uncertainties of the M87*-like parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth ligo-virgo-kagra observ- ing run (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4.0: Population properties of merging compact binaries (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

    L. Baracket al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Caneva Santoro, S

    G. Caneva Santoro, S. Roy, R. Vicente, M. Haney, O. J. Piccinni, W. Del Pozzo, and M. Martinez, First Constraints on Compact Binary Environments from LIGO-Virgo Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 251401 (2024), arXiv:2309.05061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X6, 041015 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.X 8, 039903 (2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., Laser interferometer space an- 14 tenna (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravi- tational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Cai, Z.-K

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, B. Hu, C. Liu, Y. Lu, W.-T. Ni, W.-H. Ruan, N. Seto, G. Wang, and Y.-L. Wu, On net- works of space-based gravitational-wave detectors, Fund. Res.4, 1072 (2024), arXiv:2305.04551 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Toubianaet al., Phys

    A. Toubianaet al., Detectable environmental effects in GW190521-like black-hole binaries with LISA, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 101105 (2021), arXiv:2010.06056 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    R. Chen, R. S. Chandramouli, F. Pozzoli, R. Buscic- chio, and E. Barausse, Environmental effects in the LISA stochastic signal from stellar-mass black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D112, 084053 (2025), arXiv:2507.00694 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Probing stellar binary black hole formation in galactic nuclei via the imprint of their center of mass acceleration on their gravitational wave signal

    K. Inayoshi, N. Tamanini, C. Caprini, and Z. Haiman, Probing stellar binary black hole formation in galactic nuclei via the imprint of their center of mass accelera- tion on their gravitational wave signal, Phys. Rev. D96, 063014 (2017), arXiv:1702.06529 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Samsing, I

    J. Samsing, I. Bartos, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, B. Koc- sis, N. W. C. Leigh, B. Liu, M. E. Pessah, and H. Tagawa, AGN as potential factories for eccentric black hole merg- ers, Nature603, 237 (2022), arXiv:2010.09765 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    X. Chen, S. Li, and Z. Cao, Mass–redshift degeneracy for the gravitational-wave sources in the vicinity of su- permassive black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.485, L141 (2019), arXiv:1703.10543 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Yu and Y

    H. Yu and Y. Chen, Direct determination of supermassive black hole properties with gravitational-wave radiation from surrounding stellar-mass black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 021101 (2021), arXiv:2009.02579 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    T. A. Apostolatos, C. Cutler, G. J. Sussman, and K. S. Thorne, Spin induced orbital precession and its modula- tion of the gravitational wave forms from merging bina- ries, Phys. Rev. D49, 6274 (1994)

    1994

  19. [19]

    B. Liu, D. Lai, and Y.-H. Wang, Binary Mergers near a Supermassive Black Hole: Relativistic Effects in Triples, Astrophys. J. Lett.883, L7 (2019), arXiv:1906.07726 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    A Direct Probe of Mass Density Near Inspiraling Binary Black Holes

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, A Direct Probe of Mass Density Near Inspiraling Binary Black Holes, Astrophys. J.878, 75 (2019), arXiv:1805.05335 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Cardoso, F

    V. Cardoso, F. Duque, and G. Khanna, Gravitational tuning forks and hierarchical triple systems, Phys. Rev. D103, L081501 (2021), arXiv:2101.01186 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies

    J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho, Coevolution (Or Not) of Su- permassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies, Ann. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys.51, 511 (2013), arXiv:1304.7762 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    R. C. Hickox and D. M. Alexander, Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.56, 625 (2018), arXiv:1806.04680 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    L. C. Ho and M. Kim, THE BLACK HOLE MASS SCALE OF CLASSICAL AND PSEUDO BULGES IN ACTIVE GALAXIES, Astrophys. J.789, 17 (2014), arXiv:1406.6137 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    C. S. Reynolds, Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.59, 117 (2021), arXiv:2011.08948 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    A New Type of Extreme-mass-ratio Inspirals Produced by Tidal Capture of Binary Black Holes

    X. Chen and W.-B. Han, A New Type of Extreme- mass-ratio Inspirals Produced by Tidal Capture of Bi- nary Black Holes, Communications Physics1, 53 (2018), arXiv:1801.05780 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    J. S. Santos, V. Cardoso, J. Nat´ ario, and M. van de Meent, Gravitational waves from b-emris: Doppler shift and beaming, resonant excitation, helicity oscillations and self-lensing (2025), arXiv:2506.14868 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    K. Meng, H. Zhang, X.-L. Fan, Y. Yong, and F. Du, Gravitational waves excited by binary stars orbiting around a supermassive black hole (2024), arXiv:2405.07113 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Hendriks, D

    K. Hendriks, D. Atallah, M. Martinez, M. Zevin, L. Zwick, A. A. Trani, P. Saini, J. Tak´ atsy, and J. Sam- sing, Large gravitational wave phase shifts from strong 3-body interactions in dense stellar clusters (2025), arXiv:2411.08572 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Suzuki, Y

    H. Suzuki, Y. Nakamura, and S. Yamada, General rela- tivistic effects on Hill stability of multibody systems: Sta- bility of three-body systems containing a massive black hole, Phys. Rev. D102, 124063 (2020), arXiv:2009.06999 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Kuntz, F

    A. Kuntz, F. Serra, and E. Trincherini, Effective two- body approach to the hierarchical three-body problem, Phys. Rev. D104, 024016 (2021), arXiv:2104.13387 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Kuntz, Precession resonances in hierarchical triple systems, Phys

    A. Kuntz, Precession resonances in hierarchical triple systems, Phys. Rev. D105, 024017 (2022), arXiv:2112.05167 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Kuntz, F

    A. Kuntz, F. Serra, and E. Trincherini, Effective two- body approach to the hierarchical three-body problem: Quadrupole to 1PN, Phys. Rev. D107, 044011 (2023), arXiv:2210.13493 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Y. Fang, X. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, Impact of a spinning supermassive black hole on the orbit and gravitational waves of a nearby compact binary, The Astrophysical Journal887, 210 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    Laeuger, B

    A. Laeuger, B. Seymour, Y. Chen, and H. Yu, Mea- suring supermassive black hole properties via gravita- tional radiation from eccentrically orbiting stellar mass black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D109, 064086 (2024), arXiv:2310.16799 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Y. Yin, J. Mathews, A. J. K. Chua, and X. Chen, Rela- tivistic model of binary extreme-mass-ratio inspiral sys- tems and their gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D111, 103007 (2025), arXiv:2410.09796 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Kuntz and K

    A. Kuntz and K. Leyde, Transverse Doppler effect and parameter estimation of LISA three-body systems, Phys. Rev. D108, 024002 (2023), arXiv:2212.09753 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Sbernaet al., Observing GW190521-like binary black holes and their environment with LISA, Phys

    L. Sbernaet al., Observing GW190521-like binary black holes and their environment with LISA, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064056 (2022), arXiv:2205.08550 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Stellar Processes Near the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center

    T. Alexander, Stellar processes near the massive black hole in the Galactic Center, Phys. Rept.419, 65 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0508106

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [40]

    Eggleton and L

    P. Eggleton and L. Kiseleva, An empirical condition for stability of hierarchical triple systems, The Astrophysical Journal455, 640 (1995)

    1995

  41. [41]

    Vynatheya, A

    P. Vynatheya, A. S. Hamers, R. A. Mardling, and E. P. Bellinger, Algebraic and machine learning approach to hierarchical triple-star stability, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society516, 4146 (2022). 15

    2022

  42. [42]

    R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963)

    1963

  43. [43]

    R. H. Boyer and R. W. Lindquist, Maximal analytic extension of the kerr metric, Journal of Mathematical Physics8, 265 (1967)

    1967

  44. [44]

    The Kerr spacetime: A brief introduction

    M. Visser, The kerr spacetime: A brief introduction (2008), arXiv:0706.0622 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    S. A. Teukolsky, The kerr metric, Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 124006 (2015)

    2015

  46. [46]

    Yao and X

    J.-T. Yao and X. Li, Inferring a spinning black hole in an expanding universe via the S2 star around the galactic center*, Chin. Phys. C49, 045106 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Yao, Q.-H

    J.-T. Yao, Q.-H. Zhu, and X. Li, Identifying axially sym- metric Finslerian extensions of Schwarzschild black hole via the S2 star orbiting Sagittarius A⋆, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084083 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    X. Li, X. Zhang, and H.-N. Lin, Probing a Finslerian Schwarzschild black hole with the orbital precession of Sagittarius A*, Phys. Rev. D106, 064043 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    S. M. Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduc- tion to General Relativity(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Secular Evolution Of Binaries Near Massive Black Holes: Formation of compact binaries, merger/collision products and G2-like objects

    S. Prodan, F. Antonini, and H. B. Perets, Secular Evolu- tion Of Binaries Near Massive Black Holes: Formation of compact binaries, merger/collision products and G2-like objects, Astrophys. J.799, 118 (2015), arXiv:1405.6029 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Liet al., GWSpace: a multi-mission science data simulator for space-based gravitational wave detection, Class

    E.-K. Liet al., GWSpace: a multi-mission science data simulator for space-based gravitational wave detection, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 165005 (2025), arXiv:2309.15020 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Z. Ren, T. Zhao, Z. Cao, Z.-K. Guo, W.-B. Han, H.- B. Jin, and Y.-L. Wu, Taiji data challenge for exploring gravitational wave universe, Front. Phys. (Beijing)18, 64302 (2023), arXiv:2301.02967 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    J. Wu, J. Li, X. Liu, and Z. Cao, Comparison and application of different post-Newtonian models for in- spiralling stellar-mass binary black holes with space- based GW detectors, Phys. Rev. D109, 104014 (2024), arXiv:2401.03113 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    J. Wu, J. Li, and Q.-Q. Jiang, Application of Newtonian approximate model to LIGO gravitational wave data pro- cessing, Chin. Phys. B32, 090401 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Gravitational Radiation from Post- Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    Blanchet, Analyzing Gravitational Waves with Gen- eral Relativity, Comptes Rendus Physique20, 507 (2019), arXiv:1902.09801 [gr-qc]

    L. Blanchet, Analyzing Gravitational Waves with Gen- eral Relativity, Comptes Rendus Physique20, 507 (2019), arXiv:1902.09801 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, Gravitational radia- tion from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D106, L101501 (2022), arXiv:2201.05138 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    J. Wu, M. Sun, X. Ma, X. Liu, J. Li, and Z. Cao, Ef- fect of kick velocity on gravitational wave detection of binary black holes with space- and ground-based detec- tors, Phys. Rev. D112, 024040 (2025), arXiv:2502.13710 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    J. Wu, Y. Xiao, M. Sun, and J. Li, Probing globular clusters using modulated gravitational waves from binary black holes (2025), arXiv:2508.04021 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    X. He, X. Liu, and Z. Cao, Lorentz transformation of three dimensional gravitational wave tensor, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 195020 (2022), arXiv:2302.07532 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Ro- tating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation, Astrophys. J.178, 347 (1972)

    1972

  62. [62]

    J. Wu, M. Sun, and J. Li, Constraints and detection capa- bilities of gw polarizations with space-based detectors in different tdi combinations (2024), arXiv:2411.03631 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Wu and J

    J. Wu and J. Li, Prospects of constraining on the polar- izations of gravitational waves from binary black holes using space- and ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084057 (2024), arXiv:2407.13590 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Kawamuraet al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO, Class

    S. Kawamuraet al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 094011 (2011)

    2011

  65. [65]

    S. V. Dhurandhar, K. Rajesh Nayak, S. Koshti, and J. Y. Vinet, Fundamentals of the LISA stable flight formation, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 481 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0410093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves

    T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, and C. Liu, The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 105011 (2019), arXiv:1803.01944 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Cutler, Phys

    C. Cutler, Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D57, 7089 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9703068

    work page arXiv 1998

  68. [68]

    Use and Abuse of the Fisher Information Matrix in the Assessment of Gravitational-Wave Parameter-Estimation Prospects

    M. Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher infor- mation matrix in the assessment of gravitational- wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys. Rev. D77, 042001 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0703086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Huang, Y.-M

    S.-J. Huang, Y.-M. Hu, V. Korol, P.-C. Li, Z.-C. Liang, Y. Lu, H.-T. Wang, S. Yu, and J. Mei, Science with the TianQin Observatory: Preliminary results on Galactic double white dwarf binaries, Phys. Rev. D102, 063021 (2020), arXiv:2005.07889 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Wu and J

    J. Wu and J. Li, Subtraction of the confusion foreground and parameter uncertainty of resolvable galactic binaries on the networks of space-based gravitational-wave detec- tors, Phys. Rev. D108, 124047 (2023), arXiv:2307.05568 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Iacovelli, M

    F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, GWFAST: A Fisher Information Matrix Python Code for Third-generation Gravitational-wave Detectors, As- trophys. J. Supp.263, 2 (2022), arXiv:2207.06910 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Babak, C

    S. Babak, C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, N. Karnesis, P. Marcoccia, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, A. Sesana, and J. Torrado, Stochastic gravitational wave background from stellar origin binary black holes in LISA, JCAP08, 034, arXiv:2304.06368 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The 16 Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Emami and A

    R. Emami and A. Loeb, Probingintermediate-mass black holes in M87 through multiwavelength gravitational wave observations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.495, 536 (2020), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 541, 28 (2025)], arXiv:1910.04828 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Tamburini, B

    F. Tamburini, B. Thid´ e, and M. Della Valle, Measure- ment of the spin of the M87 black hole from its ob- served twisted light, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.492, L22 (2020), arXiv:1904.07923 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020