pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23367 · v2 · pith:US35ZQ6Nnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Cosmological constraints from neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions

Xu Xiao , Zhao Chen , Yu Yu , Xiao-Dong Li , Yiqi Huang , Le Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 15:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords marked correlation functionsneighbor densitycosmological constraintstwo-point correlation functiongalaxy surveysdark energyneutrino mass
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions extract additional cosmological information beyond the standard two-point correlation function.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests whether marking galaxy pairs by their local neighbor density can pull out more information on the universe's composition from the same clustering data. It builds emulators from a large set of simulations to model how these marked statistics respond to changes in matter density, fluctuation strength, dark energy, and neutrino mass. Joint analyses of multiple mark values show clear gains in the precision of constraints on matter density and fluctuation amplitude. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a way to sharpen tests of cosmic models using data from upcoming large galaxy surveys without requiring new observations.

Core claim

The central claim is that relative to the two-point correlation function alone, combinations of three mark parameters improve the figure of merit in the Omega_m-sigma_8 plane by factors of 1.7 to 2.5, and five-mark combinations achieve gains of 1.9 to 2.4. Density-based and gradient-based marks are nearly redundant for scale statistics but add up to 43 percent more information when combined in angular statistics. The angular marked statistic keeps extra information even when the tracer selection changes.

What carries the argument

The neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions, implemented through the normalized scale statistic and the angular statistic, with varying mark parameter alpha, emulated via Gaussian processes from the simulation suite.

Load-bearing premise

The Gaussian process emulators accurately reproduce the marked statistics' dependence on cosmological parameters across the relevant range.

What would settle it

Measurements from an independent simulation suite or from actual galaxy survey data that fail to show the reported improvement in the figure of merit when using the marked statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23367 by Le Zhang, Xiao-Dong Li, Xu Xiao, Yiqi Huang, Yu Yu, Zhao Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Sampling of the 129 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Environmental quantities in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Scale-dependent marked statistic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Angular marked statistic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Leave-one-out validation errors of the GPR emulator. The left panel shows the 68th-percentile fractional error for the scale-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Covariance matrices for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: , this case exhibits stronger parameter degeneracies, resulting in biased posteriors where the 1𝜎 contours do not fully recover the true cosmology. Taken together, these results show that the primary gain from MCFs arises from combining multiple environmental weight￾ings, which effectively reduces both parameter uncertainties and degeneracies, leading to a substantially smaller allowed parameter volume. 𝑊b… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: 1D posteriors for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The MCMC results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Similar to Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Same configurations as in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Same configurations as in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Similar to Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate whether neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions (MCFs) can extract cosmological information beyond the standard redshift-space two-point correlation function (2PCF). Using the Kun suite of 129 $w_0w_a$CDM$+\sum m_\nu$ simulations in $1~h^{-1}{\rm Gpc}$ boxes, we construct Gaussian-process emulators for the normalized scale statistic $\widehat{W}^{\alpha}(s)$ and the angular statistic $\widehat{W}^{\alpha}_{\Delta s}(\mu)$. We perform joint analyses combining multiple mark parameters $\alpha$ and quantify the information gain using the FoM in the $\Omega_m$--$\sigma_8$ plane. Relative to the 2PCF case, three-mark combinations improve the FoM by factors of $1.7$--$2.5$, while five-mark combinations increase the gain to $1.9$--$2.4$, depending on the statistic and mark definition. We further compare density and normalized-gradient marks, finding that they are nearly redundant for isotropic statistics but complementary for angular statistics, where their combination improves the FoM by up to $43\%$. Tests of scale range and halo selection show that the marked statistics remain robust under changes in analysis choices, with the angular statistic retaining additional cosmological information that is less sensitive to tracer selection. Our results demonstrate that MCFs substantially enhance cosmological constraints beyond the standard 2PCF and provide a robust probe for next-generation galaxy surveys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions (MCFs) extract additional cosmological information beyond the standard redshift-space 2PCF. Using 129 Kun-suite w0waCDM+∑mν simulations, Gaussian-process emulators are built for the normalized scale statistic Ŵ^α(s) and angular statistic Ŵ^α_Δs(μ). Joint analyses with multiple mark parameters α yield FoM gains in the Ωm–σ8 plane of 1.7–2.5 (three-mark) and 1.9–2.4 (five-mark) relative to the 2PCF, with density and normalized-gradient marks shown to be complementary for angular statistics (up to 43% FoM improvement) and the marked statistics robust to scale-range and halo-selection choices.

Significance. If the emulators are shown to be accurate, the work demonstrates that MCFs can meaningfully tighten constraints from next-generation surveys while remaining robust to analysis variations, offering a practical extension to standard 2PCF analyses.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 and §4] §3 (Emulator construction) and §4 (Results): The headline FoM ratios (1.7–2.5 and 1.9–2.4) are obtained from GP predictions; however, the manuscript supplies no quantitative validation metrics such as leave-one-out cross-validation errors, maximum interpolation residuals, or tests against an independent cosmology. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that emulator modeling error is smaller than the differences driving the reported gains.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (Mark comparison): The claim that density and normalized-gradient marks are 'nearly redundant' for isotropic statistics but 'complementary' for angular statistics (43% FoM gain) rests on the emulator outputs; any systematic bias in the GP interpolation of the angular statistic would directly affect this complementarity result.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] The abstract and §2 would benefit from a brief statement of the exact number of training simulations used per emulator and the range of α values explored.
  2. [§2] Notation for the normalized statistics Ŵ^α(s) and Ŵ^α_Δs(μ) is introduced without an explicit equation linking them to the underlying marked pair counts; adding this would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major points below regarding emulator validation and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested metrics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (Emulator construction) and §4 (Results): The headline FoM ratios (1.7–2.5 and 1.9–2.4) are obtained from GP predictions; however, the manuscript supplies no quantitative validation metrics such as leave-one-out cross-validation errors, maximum interpolation residuals, or tests against an independent cosmology. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that emulator modeling error is smaller than the differences driving the reported gains.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative validation metrics for the GP emulators are essential to support the reported FoM gains. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection to §3 reporting leave-one-out cross-validation errors and maximum interpolation residuals for both Ŵ^α(s) and Ŵ^α_Δs(μ) across all mark parameters. We will also present results from holding out one cosmology from the 129-simulation suite as an independent test. These metrics confirm that emulator errors remain sub-dominant to the cosmological variations driving the 1.7–2.5× FoM improvements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (Mark comparison): The claim that density and normalized-gradient marks are 'nearly redundant' for isotropic statistics but 'complementary' for angular statistics (43% FoM gain) rests on the emulator outputs; any systematic bias in the GP interpolation of the angular statistic would directly affect this complementarity result.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the reported complementarity (and 43% FoM gain) for the angular statistic depends on emulator fidelity. The new validation subsection in revised §3 will include LOO-CV errors and residuals specifically for Ŵ^α_Δs(μ) under density and normalized-gradient marks. We will additionally show that the interpolation uncertainties do not change the relative FoM when the two marks are combined, thereby confirming that the complementarity result is robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results from independent simulations and emulators

full rationale

The derivation chain relies on N-body simulations from the Kun suite and Gaussian-process emulators to compute FoM gains for marked correlation functions relative to 2PCF. No equations reduce by construction to fitted inputs, no self-definitional steps appear, and no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are invoked. The reported improvement factors are obtained by direct evaluation on emulated statistics, with the central claim remaining independent of the paper's own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the fidelity of the named simulation suite and the accuracy of the Gaussian-process emulators; these are domain assumptions not independently verified in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • mark parameter α
    Multiple discrete values of α are chosen to define the neighbor-density weighting; specific values are not listed in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Kun suite of 129 w0waCDM+∑m_ν simulations in 1 h⁻¹ Gpc boxes accurately represent the target cosmology for emulator training.
    Emulators are constructed directly from these simulations to predict the marked statistics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5806 in / 1496 out tokens · 69084 ms · 2026-06-30T15:05:16.134962+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The first is the adaptive local density itself, 𝑤=𝜌 𝑛NB .(4) This mark directly upweights halos in dense environments

    Choice of marks Weusetwoenvironmentalmarksinthelikelihoodanalysis. The first is the adaptive local density itself, 𝑤=𝜌 𝑛NB .(4) This mark directly upweights halos in dense environments. It is therefore sensitive to the clustering of halos in compact overdense structures. The second mark is the normalized density gradient, 𝑤= |∇𝜌 𝑛NB | 𝜌𝑛NB .(5) This quant...

  2. [2]

    Marked two-point statistic We now incorporate the environmental marks into a two- point statistic. For a given mark𝑤and mark power𝛼, we define the marked correlation function as 𝑊 𝛼 (r)= ⟨𝛿(x)𝑤 𝛼 (x)𝛿(x+r)𝑤 𝛼 (x+r) ⟩ .(6) Here𝛿is the tracer overdensity field, and the exponent𝛼 controls how strongly the mark affects the pair weighting. Forcomparison,theord...

  3. [3]

    To build a compact data vector, we compress it in two comple- mentary ways

    Scale and angular compression The full two-dimensional statistic𝑊𝛼 (𝑠, 𝜇)contains both scale dependence and line-of-sight angular dependence. To build a compact data vector, we compress it in two comple- mentary ways. First, to isolate the scale dependence, we integrate over the angular range, 𝑊 𝛼 (𝑠)= ∫ 𝜇max 𝜇min 𝑊 𝛼 (𝑠, 𝜇)𝑑𝜇.(9) This statistic measures ...

  4. [4]

    Normalized marked correlation functions Forlikelihoodinference,wefocusontheshapeinformation rather than the overall integral of each marked statistic. We therefore define the normalized scale-dependent statistic as b𝑊 𝛼 (𝑠)= 𝑊 𝛼 (𝑠)∫ 𝑠max 𝑠min 𝑊 𝛼 (𝑠 ′)𝑑𝑠 ′ .(11) 5 FIG.2: Environmentalquantitiesina500×500(ℎ −1Mpc)2 sliceofaKunhalocatalog. Left: thelocal-d...

  5. [5]

    The full simulation is divided into 𝑁sub =5 3 =125subsamples, each with volume𝑉 sub = (400ℎ −1Mpc)3

    Data covariance We estimate the data covariance from subvolumes of the Jiutiansimulation. The full simulation is divided into 𝑁sub =5 3 =125subsamples, each with volume𝑉 sub = (400ℎ −1Mpc)3. Lety 𝑘 be the data vector measured from the𝑘-th subvolume, and let ¯y= 1 𝑁sub 𝑁sub∑︁ 𝑘=1 y𝑘 (29) be the mean over all subvolumes. The covariance for an ob- served vol...

  6. [6]

    We estimate this term using the leave-one-out validation de- scribed in the previous section

    Emulator covariance The emulator covariance quantifies the uncertainty intro- duced by interpolation across cosmological parameter space. We estimate this term using the leave-one-out validation de- scribed in the previous section. For the𝑗-th training cosmol- ogy, the emulator is trained on all other cosmologies and then evaluated at the omitted point. T...

  7. [7]

    Correction for fixed initial phases TheKuntraining simulations are generated with fixed ini- tial phases. While this suppresses sample variance and im- proves emulator training, it can introduce a systematic offset between the emulator prediction and the ensemble-averaged statistic from independent realizations. Following the ratio- based correction [84],...

  8. [8]

    We correct this bias using the Hartlap factor [85]

    Inverse covariance correction Because the covariance matrix is estimated from a finite number of subvolumes, its inverse is biased. We correct this bias using the Hartlap factor [85]. The debiased inverse co- variance is bC−1 = 𝑁sub −𝑁 𝑑 −2 𝑁sub −1 C−1,(36) 9 31 46 62 77w 31 46 62 77 w 31 46 62 77w / 31 46 62 77 w / 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 W(s) 0.2 0.4 0...

    2021

  9. [9]

    Colless, B

    M. Colless, B. A. Peterson, C. Jackson, J. A. Peacock, S. Cole, P. Norberg, I. K. Baldry, C. M. Baugh, J. Bland-Hawthorn, T. Bridges, et al., arXiv Astrophysics e-prints (2003), astro- 14 0.26 0.30 0.34 0.38 m 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.88 8 0.76 0.80 0.84 0.88 8 Mcut = 3.85 × 1012 M Mcut = 3.15 × 1012 M Mcut = 1.65 × 1012 M 0.2 0.3 0.4 m 0.6 0.7 0.8...

    work page arXiv 2003

  10. [10]

    The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z \approx 0 measurement of the growth rate and sigma_8

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley- Smith, G. B. Poole, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson, mnras423, 3430 (2012), 1204.4725

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [14]

    D. J. Eisenstein, I. Zehavi, D. W. Hogg, R. Scoccimarro, M. R. Blanton, R. C. Nichol, R. Scranton, H.-J. Seo, M. Tegmark, Z. Zheng, et al., Astrophys. J.633, 560 (2005), astro- ph/0501171

    work page arXiv 2005

  12. [15]

    W. J. Percival, S. Cole, D. J. Eisenstein, R. C. Nichol, J. A. Peacock,A.C.Pope,andA.S.Szalay,mnras381,1053(2007), 0705.3323

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [16]

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 9 Spectroscopic Galaxy Sample

    L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, D. Bizyaev, M. Blanton, A. S. Bolton, J. Brinkmann, J. R. Brownstein, A. Burden, A. J. Cuesta, et al., mnras427, 3435 (2012), 1203.6594

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [17]

    S.Alam,M.Ata,S.Bailey,F.Beutler,D.Bizyaev,J.A.Blazek, A.S.Bolton,J.R.Brownstein,A.Burden,C.-H.Chuang,etal., mnras470, 2617 (2017), 1607.03155

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [18]

    Kaiser, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 227, 1 (1987)

    N. Kaiser, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 227, 1 (1987)

    1987

  16. [19]

    W. E. Ballinger, J. A. Peacock, and A. F. Heavens, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society282, 877 (1996), astro-ph/9605017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  17. [20]

    D.J.EisensteinandW.Hu,TheAstrophysicalJournal496,605 (1998), astro-ph/9709112

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  18. [21]

    Probing dark energy using baryonic oscillations in the galaxy power spectrum as a cosmological ruler

    C. Blake and K. Glazebrook, The Astrophysical Journal594, 665 (2003), astro-ph/0301632

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [22]

    Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations from Future Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys

    H.-J. Seo and D. J. Eisenstein, The Astrophysical Journal598, 720 (2003), astro-ph/0307460

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  20. [23]

    Colless, B

    M. Colless, B. A. Peterson, C. Jackson, J. A. Peacock, S. Cole, P. Norberg, I. K. Baldry, C. M. Baugh, J. Bland-Hawthorn, T.Bridges,etal.,arXive-printsastro-ph/0306581(2003),astro- ph/0306581

    work page arXiv 2003

  21. [24]

    I., Rowell , G

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, G. B. Poole, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society423, 3430 (2012), ISSN 0035-8711, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/423/4/3430/4903419/mnras0423-3430.pdf, URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x 2012

  22. [25]

    The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: measuring the cosmic expansion history using the Alcock-Paczynski test and distant supernovae

    C. Blake, K. Glazebrook, T. M. Davis, S. Brough, M. Colless, C.Contreras,W.Couch,S.Croom,M.J.Drinkwater,K.Forster, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society418, 1725 (2011), 1108.2637

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [26]

    The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9

    C. Blake, S. Brough, M. Colless, C. Contreras, W. Couch, S. Croom, T. Davis, M. J. Drinkwater, K. Forster, D. Gilbank, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society415, 2876 (2011), 1104.2948

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [27]

    D. G. York, J. Adelman, J. Anderson, John E., S. F. Anderson, J.Annis,N.A.Bahcall,J.A.Bakken,R.Barkhouser,S.Bastian, E. Berman, et al., The Astronomical Journal120, 1579 (2000), astro-ph/0006396

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  25. [28]

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological implications of the large-scale two-point correlation function

    A.G.Sánchez,C.G.Scóccola,A.J.Ross,W.Percival,M.Man- era, F. Montesano, X. Mazzalay, A. J. Cuesta, D. J. Eisenstein, E. Kazin, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society425, 415 (2012), 1203.6616

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [29]

    A. G. Sánchez, E. A. Kazin, F. Beutler, C.-H. Chuang, A. J. Cuesta,D.J.Eisenstein,M.Manera,F.Montesano,R.C.Nichol, N. Padmanabhan, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society433, 1202 (2013), 1303.4396. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [30]

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 10 and 11 galaxy samples

    L. Anderson, É. Aubourg, S. Bailey, F. Beutler, V. Bhardwaj, M. Blanton, A. S. Bolton, J. Brinkmann, J. R. Brownstein, A. Burden, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society441, 24 (2014), 1312.4877

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [31]

    L.Samushia,B.A.Reid,M.White,W.J.Percival,A.J.Cuesta, G.-B. Zhao, A. J. Ross, M. Manera, É. Aubourg, F. Beutler, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society439, 3504 (2014), 1312.4899

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [32]

    A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden, and M. Manera, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society449, 835 (2015), 1409.3242

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [33]

    The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in Fourier-space

    F. Beutler, H.-J. Seo, A. J. Ross, P. McDonald, S. Saito, A. S. Bolton, J. R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, A. J. Cuesta, D. J. Eisenstein, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society464, 3409 (2017), 1607.03149

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [34]

    A. G. Sánchez, J. N. Grieb, S. Salazar-Albornoz, S. Alam, F. Beutler, A. J. Ross, J. R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, A. J. Cuesta, D. J. Eisenstein, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society464, 1493 (2017), 1607.03146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [35]

    C.-H.Chuang,F.-S.Kitaura,Y.Liang,A.Font-Ribera,C.Zhao, P.McDonald,andC.Tao,PhysicalReviewD95,063528(2017), 1605.05352

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [36]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. E. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, J. Annis, S. Bai- ley, C. Balland, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1611.00036 (2016), 1611.00036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [37]

    LSST Science Collaboration, P. A. Abell, J. Allison, S. F. An- derson, J. R. Andrew, J. R. P. Angel, L. Armus, D. Arnett, S. J. Asztalos, T. S. Axelrod, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:0912.0201 (2009), 0912.0201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [38]

    Euclid Definition Study Report

    R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J. L. Auguères, J. Brinch- mann,R.Cole,M.Cropper,C.Dabin,L.Duvet,A.Ealet,etal., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1110.3193 (2011), 1110.3193

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [39]

    Mellieret al.(Euclid),Astron

    Euclid Collaboration, Y. Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J. A. Acevedo Barroso, A. Achúcarro, J. Adamek, R. Adam, G. E. Ad- dison, N. Aghanim, M. Aguena, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2405.13491 (2024), 2405.13491

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [40]

    O.Dore,C.Hirata,Y.Wang,D.Weinberg,T.Eifler,R.J.Foley, C. H. Heinrich, E. Krause, S. Perlmutter, A. Pisani, et al., Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc.51, 341 (2019), 1904.01174

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [41]

    Y. Gong, X. Liu, Y. Cao, X. Chen, Z. Fan, R. Li, X.-D. Li, Z. Li, X. Zhang, and H. Zhan, Astrophys. J.883, 203 (2019), 1901.04634

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [42]

    C. G. Sabiu, D. F. Mota, C. Llinares, and C. Park, Astronomy and Astrophysics592, A38 (2016), 1603.05750

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [43]

    Detection of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Features in the Large-Scale 3-Point Correlation Function of SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS Galaxies

    Z. Slepian, D. J. Eisenstein, J. R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, H. Gil-Marín, S. Ho, F.-S. Kitaura, W. J. Percival, A. J. Ross, G. Rossi, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society469, 1738 (2017), 1607.06097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [44]

    C. G. Sabiu, B. Hoyle, J. Kim, and X.-D. Li, The Astrophysical Journals242, 29 (2019), 1901.00296

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [45]

    B. S. Ryden, The Astrophysical Journal452, 25 (1995), astro- ph/9506028

    work page arXiv 1995

  43. [46]

    Precision cosmography with stacked voids

    G. Lavaux and B. D. Wandelt, The Astrophysical Journal754, 109 (2012), 1110.0345

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  44. [47]

    Estimating Cosmological Parameters from the Dark Matter Distribution

    S. Ravanbakhsh, J. Oliva, S. Fromenteau, L. C. Price, S. Ho, J.Schneider,andB.Poczos,arXive-prints(2017),1711.02033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [48]

    CosmoFlow: Using Deep Learning to Learn the Universe at Scale

    A. Mathuriya, D. Bard, P. Mendygral, L. Meadows, J. Arne- mann, L. Shao, S. He, T. Karna, D. Moise, S. J. Pennycook, et al., arXiv e-prints (2018), 1808.04728

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [49]

    S. Pan, M. Liu, J. Forero-Romero, C. G. Sabiu, Z. Li, H. Miao, and X.-D. Li, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 63, 110412 (2020)

    2020

  47. [50]

    Luminosity- and morphology-dependent clustering of galaxies

    C. Beisbart and M. Kerscher, The Astrophysical Journal545, 6 (2000), astro-ph/0003358

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  48. [51]

    Beisbart, M

    C. Beisbart, M. Kerscher, and K. Mecke (2002), vol. 600, pp. 358–390

    2002

  49. [52]

    Spatial distribution of galactic halos and their merger histories

    S. Gottlöber, M. Kerscher, A. V. Kravtsov, A. Faltenbacher, A. Klypin, and V. Müller, Astronomy and Astrophysics387, 778 (2002), astro-ph/0203148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  50. [53]

    R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society350, 1385 (2004), astro-ph/0402237

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [54]

    R. K. Sheth, A. J. Connolly, and R. Skibba (2005), astro- ph/0511773

    work page arXiv 2005

  52. [55]

    R.Skibba,R.K.Sheth,A.J.Connolly,andR.Scranton,Monthly NoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety369,68(2006),astro- ph/0512463

    work page arXiv 2006

  53. [56]

    Breaking Halo Occupation Degeneracies with Marked Statistics

    M. White and N. Padmanabhan, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society395, 2381 (2009), 0812.4288

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [57]

    A marked correlation function for constraining modified gravity models

    M. White, JCAP2016, 057 (2016), 1609.08632

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [58]

    S.Satpathy,R.ACCroft,S.Ho,andB.Li,MonthlyNoticesof theRoyalAstronomicalSociety484,2148(2019),1901.01447

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [59]

    Massara, F

    E. Massara, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, S. Ho, N. Dalal, and D. N. Spergel, Physical Review Letters126, 011301 (2021)

    2021

  57. [60]

    O. H. E. Philcox, E. Massara, and D. N. Spergel (2020), 2006.10055

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [61]

    Huang, L

    Y.Yang,H.Miao,Q.Ma,M.Liu,C.G.Sabiu,J.Forero-Romero, Y. Huang, L. Lai, Q. Qian, Y. Zheng, et al., The Astrophysical Journal900, 6 (2020)

    2020

  59. [62]

    X. Xiao, Y. Yang, X. Luo, J. Ding, Z. Huang, X. Wang, Y. Zheng, C. G. Sabiu, J. Forero-Romero, H. Miao, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513, 595–603 (2022), ISSN 1365-2966, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1093/mnras/stac879

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac879 2022

  60. [63]

    L. Lai, J. Ding, X. Luo, Y. Yang, Z. Wang, K. Liu, G. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Zheng, Z. Li, et al., Science China Physics, Me- chanics & Astronomy67(2024), ISSN 1869-1927, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2384-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2384-4 2024

  61. [64]

    The Coyote Universe II: Cosmological Models and Precision Emulation of the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum

    K. Heitmann, D. Higdon, M. White, S. Habib, B. J. Williams, E. Lawrence, and C. Wagner, Astrophys. J.705, 156 (2009), 0902.0429

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [65]

    The Coyote Universe I: Precision Determination of the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum

    K. Heitmann, M. White, C. Wagner, S. Habib, and D. Higdon, Astrophys. J.715, 104 (2010), 0812.1052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [66]

    The Coyote Universe III: Simulation Suite and Precision Emulator for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum

    E. Lawrence, K. Heitmann, M. White, D. Higdon, C. Wagner, S. Habib, and B. Williams, Astrophys. J.713, 1322 (2010), 0912.4490

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [67]

    The Coyote Universe Extended: Precision Emulation of the Matter Power Spectrum

    K. Heitmann, E. Lawrence, J. Kwan, S. Habib, and D. Higdon, Astrophys. J.780, 111 (2014), 1304.7849

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [68]

    The Mira-Titan Universe II: Matter Power Spectrum Emulation

    E. Lawrence, K. Heitmann, J. Kwan, A. Upadhye, D. Bingham, S. Habib, D. Higdon, A. Pope, H. Finkel, and N. Frontiere, Astrophys. J.847, 50 (2017), 1705.03388

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [69]

    Bocquet, K

    S. Bocquet, K. Heitmann, S. Habib, E. Lawrence, T. Uram, N. Frontiere, A. Pope, and H. Finkel, arXiv e-prints (2020), 2003.12116

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [70]

    J.Kwan,K.Heitmann,S.Habib,N.Padmanabhan,E.Lawrence, H.Finkel,N.Frontiere,andA.Pope,TheAstrophysicalJournal 810, 35 (2015)

    2015

  68. [71]

    B. D. Wibking, D. H. Weinberg, A. N. Salcedo, H.-Y. Wu, S. Singh, S. Rodríguez-Torres, L. H. Garrison, and D. J. Eisenstein, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety492, 2872–2896 (2019), ISSN 1365-2966, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3423

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3423 2019

  69. [72]

    J. Kwan, S. Bhattacharya, K. Heitmann, and S. Habib, The Astrophysical Journal768, 123 (2013), ISSN 1538-4357, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/123

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/123 2013

  70. [73]

    Nishimichi et al., The Astrophysical Journal884, 29 (2019), ISSN 1538-4357, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10

    T. Nishimichi et al., The Astrophysical Journal884, 29 (2019), ISSN 1538-4357, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/ab3719. 16

    2019

  71. [74]

    Kobayashi, T

    Y. Kobayashi, T. Nishimichi, M. Takada, R. Takahashi, and K.Osato,arXive-printsarXiv:2005.06122(2020),2005.06122

    work page arXiv 2005

  72. [75]

    J. Kwan, S. Saito, A. Leauthaud, K. Heitmann, S. Habib, N. Frontiere, H. Guo, S. Huang, A. Pope, and S. Rodriguéz- Torres, Astrophys. J.952, 80 (2023), 2302.12379

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [76]

    Upadhye, J

    K.R.Moran,K.Heitmann,E.Lawrence,S.Habib,D.Bingham, A. Upadhye, J. Kwan, D. Higdon, and R. Payne, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.520, 3443 (2023), 2207.12345

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [77]

    Cranmer, J

    K. Cranmer, J. Brehmer, and G. Louppe, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 30055–30062 (2020), ISSN 1091-6490, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1912789117

    2020

  75. [78]

    Z. Chen, Y. Yu, J. Han, and Y. P. Jing, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2502.11160 (2025), 2502.11160

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [79]

    Springel, R

    V. Springel, R. Pakmor, O. Zier, and M. Reinecke, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506, 2871–2949 (2021), ISSN 1365-2966, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stab1855

    2021

  77. [80]

    J. Han, M. Li, W. Jiang, Z. Chen, H. Wang, C. Wei, F. He, J. He, J. Zhang, Y. Liu, et al., The jiutian simulations for the csst extra-galactic surveys (2025), 2503.21368, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503. 21368

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [81]

    Sobol, Vychisl

    I. Sobol, Vychisl. Mat. i Mater. Phys7, 784 (1967)

    1967

  79. [82]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, et al., Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), 1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [83]

    R. E. Angulo and A. Pontzen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.462, L1 (2016), 1603.05253

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.