Pith. sign in

Paper Integrity Record · LEDGER

Diagnostic Certificates of Data Quality and Regression Identifiability for Koopman Identification

As of 20 May 2026, Pith completed 4 of 4 listed checks against arXiv:2605.09545. The completed checks produced 4 public findings within their stated scope.

This is a record of named checks, not a clean-status claim or a paper verdict.

pith.integrity.v1
2605.09545 v1

Coverage vector

completed 4 of 4 listed checks

Counted as completed checks in the claim sentence numerator.

Listed checks

claim_evidence

completed

v1.0.0, observed 2026-05-20 07:42:01.337353+00:00

Scope
Recorded paper claims checked for the evidence artifacts they name.
Completed surface
Completed within the stated scope.

ai_meta_artifact

completed

v1.0.0, observed 2026-05-19 16:40:23.399068+00:00

Scope
Paper body text scanned for literal AI-assistant artifacts.
Completed surface
Checked 1 reference.

doi_title_agreement

completed

v1.0.0, observed 2026-05-19 13:01:17.591877+00:00

Scope
Cited titles compared with titles resolved from their DOI or arXiv identifier.
Completed surface
Checked 16 references.

doi_compliance

completed

v1.0.0, observed 2026-05-19 10:09:19.319982+00:00

Scope
DOI and arXiv identifiers listed in the bibliography checked against named registries.
Completed surface
Checked 21 references. Recorded 4 findings from this run.

Observations

advisory doi_compliance · recoverable_identifier

DOI in the printed bibliography is fragmented by whitespace or line breaks. A longer candidate (10.1109/TRO.2019.2923880.Nikil) was visible in the surrounding text but could not be confirmed against doi.org as printed.

ref #1 · 2026-05-19 10:09:19.319982+00:00

Finding detail Try DOI

advisory doi_compliance · recoverable_identifier

DOI in the printed bibliography is fragmented by whitespace or line breaks. A longer candidate (10.1109/LCSYS.2024.3522594.Diagnostic) was visible in the surrounding text but could not be confirmed against doi.org as printed.

ref #17 · 2026-05-19 10:09:19.319982+00:00

Finding detail Try DOI

advisory doi_compliance · recoverable_identifier

DOI in the printed bibliography is fragmented by whitespace or line breaks. A longer candidate (10.1016/j.automatica.2016.04.052.Mario) was visible in the surrounding text but could not be confirmed against doi.org as printed.

ref #5 · 2026-05-19 10:09:19.319982+00:00

Finding detail Try DOI

critical doi_compliance · unresolvable_identifier

Identifier '10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03' is syntactically valid but the DOI registry (doi.org) returned 404, and Crossref / OpenAlex / internal corpus also have no record. The cited work could not be located through any authoritative source.

ref #9 · 2026-05-19 10:09:19.319982+00:00

Finding detail Try DOI

Methods and limits

Each listed check names the surface it examined. A skipped, failed, partial, unavailable, not collected, not requested, or withheld check says nothing about what a completed check would have returned.

  • Only checks with status completed enter the claim sentence numerator.
  • Findings appear only from completed checks and only within the scope printed for that check.
  • Severity labels describe one observation row. They do not roll up into a paper judgment.