Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational-wave signals from compact binary mergers provide luminosity distances that can be paired with redshifts to measure the Universe's expansion history independently.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 23:30 UTC pith:JH4MCCVM

load-bearing objection This is a review paper restating the standard-siren framework with no new results or derivations.

arxiv 2605.08595 v2 pith:JH4MCCVM submitted 2026-05-09 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cosmology

Wen Zhao , Liang-Gui Zhu , Youjun Lu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesstandard sirenscosmologyHubble constantdark energybinary mergersluminosity distancemulti-messenger astronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how gravitational-wave observations from merging neutron stars and black holes yield a direct measurement of luminosity distance based on the waveform amplitude. When this distance is combined with a redshift obtained either from electromagnetic counterparts or statistical host-galaxy associations, the events function as standard sirens for cosmology. The review examines three classes of sirens and projects the precision reachable with second- and third-generation ground-based detectors plus space-based observatories on parameters such as the Hubble constant and dark-energy equation of state. A reader cares because the method supplies a distance indicator that bypasses the usual electromagnetic distance ladder and its calibration uncertainties. The discussion also outlines the main technical challenges in waveform modeling, counterpart identification, and selection effects.

Core claim

Observations of gravitational-wave signals from compact binary mergers enable an independent measurement of the luminosity distance to the source. This implies that gravitational-wave sources can serve as standard sirens to probe the expansion history of the Universe, providing a new approach to constrain cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant and dark energy properties.

What carries the argument

The standard siren method, which extracts luminosity distance directly from the gravitational-wave waveform and pairs it with redshift information to infer cosmological parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The luminosity distance extracted from the gravitational-wave waveform can be reliably paired with a redshift measurement without large systematic biases from waveform modeling or selection effects.

What would settle it

A catalog of dozens of standard-siren events that yields a Hubble-constant value discrepant from both cosmic-microwave-background and local-distance-ladder results at more than 3-sigma significance would indicate that the pairing or distance extraction step is systematically biased.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Bright sirens from binary neutron star mergers with electromagnetic counterparts can deliver sub-percent measurements of the Hubble constant once a sufficient number of events are detected.
  • Dark sirens from stellar-mass binary black hole mergers can be used statistically even without counterparts, albeit with larger uncertainties that decrease as detector sensitivity improves.
  • Lensed gravitational-wave events add an independent magnification-based distance probe that can tighten dark-energy constraints.
  • Third-generation ground-based detectors and space-based observatories are projected to reach percent-level precision on the dark-energy equation-of-state parameter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method reaches the forecasted precision, it could provide an independent cross-check on the current tension between early- and late-Universe Hubble-constant measurements.
  • Statistical redshift assignment for dark sirens may require careful population modeling to avoid selection biases that mimic changes in cosmological parameters.
  • Combining standard-siren data with traditional probes could reduce the impact of any single-method systematic error on dark-energy inferences.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of gravitational-wave standard sirens, covering the extraction of luminosity distance from compact binary merger waveforms, methods for obtaining redshifts (electromagnetic counterparts or statistical host association), and the cosmological constraining power of bright sirens (BNS with EM counterparts), dark sirens (stellar-mass BBH), and dark lensed sirens. It discusses second- and third-generation ground-based detectors as well as space-based detectors for measuring the Hubble constant and dark energy parameters.

Significance. As a review that consolidates the standard-siren framework already validated by events such as GW170817, the paper provides a useful synthesis of established methods and detector prospects. It does not advance new derivations or falsifiable predictions but offers a consolidated overview of the three siren classes and their application to cosmology.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'providing a new approach' could be clarified to emphasize that the method is an established extension of GR waveform analysis rather than a novel theoretical framework.
  2. The manuscript should include a dedicated section or table comparing the systematic uncertainties (waveform modeling, selection effects, host-galaxy matching) across the three siren types to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our review manuscript on gravitational-wave standard sirens and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper restates established framework with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is a review article that summarizes the standard-siren method (luminosity distance from GW waveform amplitude paired with redshift) without advancing any new derivation, ansatz, or prediction. The central claim reduces to the GR result already validated externally by GW170817 and subsequent analyses; no equations or steps in the provided text reduce by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations. All referenced methods are drawn from prior independent literature.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5707 in / 978 out tokens · 22965 ms · 2026-06-30T23:30:52.863790+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The discovery of the gravitational-wave event GW170817 from a binary neutron star merger, together with its multi-wavelength electromagnetic counterparts, marks the beginning of the era of multi-messenger gravitational-wave astronomy. Observations of gravitational-wave signals from compact binary mergers enable an independent measurement of the luminosity distance to the source. This implies that gravitational-wave sources can serve as "standard sirens" to probe the expansion history of the Universe, providing a new approach to constrain cosmological parameters. In this paper, we review the basic principles of using gravitational-wave standard sirens to constrain cosmology. We discuss various methods for determining the source distance and redshift, as well as the capabilities of second- and third-generation ground-based detectors and space-based detectors in constraining cosmological parameters, especially the Hubble constant and dark energy parameters. By examining three types of standard sirens: binary neutron star mergers with electromagnetic counterparts as bright sirens, stellar-mass binary black hole mergers as dark sirens, and the dark lensed sirens, we illustrate the methodology, challenges, and future prospects of the standard siren approach.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent H0 from GWTC-4 standard sirens and TDCOSMO 2025 strong lensing time delays

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Combining GWTC-4 standard sirens with TDCOSMO2025 lensing data under the distance sum rule yields H0 = 83.78 +12.53/-10.23 km/s/Mpc (13.6% precision) in one configuration, consistent with both Planck and SH0ES.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2026, JCAP , 2026, 0 81 3, 16

    Abac, A., Abramo, R., Albanesi, S., et al. 2026, JCAP , 2026, 0 81 3, 16

    2026

  2. [2]

    GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation

    Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025a, a rXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.04348 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [4]

    P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, Phys. Re v. Lett., 116, 061102 2, 3

    2016

  4. [5]

    P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2019, Astroph ys. J. Lett., 882, L24 15, 16

    2019

  5. [6]

    D., Abraham, S., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2021, Astrophy s. J. Lett., 915, L5 3

    2021

  6. [7]

    2025, Phys

    Abbott, R., Abe, H., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 1 12, 084080 2

    2025

  7. [8]

    E., Drever, R

    Abramovici, A., Althouse, W . E., Drever, R. W . P ., et al. 1992, Science, 256, 325 3

    1992

  8. [9]

    2015, Classi cal and Quantum Gravity, 32, 024001 3

    Acernese, F., Agathos, M., Agatsuma, K., et al. 2015, Classi cal and Quantum Gravity, 32, 024001 3

    2015

  9. [10]

    2004, Classical a nd Quantum Gravity, 21, S385 3

    Acernese, F., Amico, P ., Arnaud, N., et al. 2004, Classical a nd Quantum Gravity, 21, S385 3

    2004

  10. [11]

    M., et al

    Agazie, G., Anumarlapudi, A., Archibald, A. M., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J. Lett., 951, L8 5

    2023

  11. [12]

    2023, L iving Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2 4, 21

    Amaro-Seoane, P ., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., et al. 2023, L iving Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2 4, 21

    2023

  12. [13]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P ., Audley, H., Babak, S., et al. 2017, arXiv e -prints, arXiv:1702.00786 3, 22 36 W. Zhao et al

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [14]

    G., Iyer, B

    Arun, K. G., Iyer, B. R., Sathyaprakash, B. S., Sinha, S., & va n den Broeck, C. 2007, Phys. Rev. D, 76, 104016 21

    2007

  14. [15]

    T., Blumer, H., et al

    Arzoumanian, Z., Baker, P . T., Blumer, H., et al. 2020, Astro phys. J. Lett., 905, L34 5

    2020

  15. [16]

    Tests of General Relativity: A Review

    Asmodelle, E. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.04397 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [17]

    2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 5 4, 5, 22

    Auclair, P ., Bacon, D., Baker, T., et al. 2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 5 4, 5, 22

    2023

  17. [18]

    D., Barbier, L

    Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005 , Space Sci. Rev., 120, 143 27

    2005

  18. [19]

    2016, Astron

    Belczynski, K., Heger, A., Gladysz, W ., et al. 2016, Astron. Astrophys., 594, A97 15

    2016

  19. [20]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Barlow, T., et al. 2019, Publ. A stron. Soc. Pac., 131, 068003 25

    2019

  20. [21]

    G., & Sathyapra kash, B

    Borhanian, S., Dhani, A., Gupta, A., Arun, K. G., & Sathyapra kash, B. S. 2020, Astrophys. J. Lett., 905, L28 17

    2020

  21. [22]

    A., Keane, E., & Wagg, J

    Braun, R., Bourke, T., Green, J. A., Keane, E., & Wagg, J. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 174 5, 11

    2015

  22. [23]

    R., Charisi, M., et al

    Burke-Spolaor, S., Taylor, S. R., Charisi, M., et al. 2019, A stron. Astrophys. Rev., 27, 5 5

    2019

  23. [24]

    2024, Fundamental Rese arch, 4, 1072 24

    Cai, R.-G., Guo, Z.-K., Hu, B., et al. 2024, Fundamental Rese arch, 4, 1072 24

    2024

  24. [25]

    2017, JCAP , 2017, 03123

    Cai, R.-G., Tamanini, N., & Y ang, T. 2017, JCAP , 2017, 03123

    2017

  25. [26]

    2017, Phys

    Cai, R.-G., & Y ang, T. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 044024 21

    2017

  26. [27]

    2023, Phys

    Califano, M., de Martino, I., V ernieri, D., & Capozziello, S . 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 123519 17

    2023

  27. [28]

    R., Rossi, L

    Chattopadhyay, D., Stevenson, S., Hurley, J. R., Rossi, L. J ., & Flynn, C. 2020, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 494, 1587 15

    2020

  28. [29]

    Chen, H.-Y ., Fishbach, M., & Holz, D. E. 2018, Nature, 562, 54 5 18

    2018

  29. [30]

    2019, Physical Review X, 9, 031028 8

    Chen, H.-Y ., Vitale, S., & Narayan, R. 2019, Physical Review X, 9, 031028 8

    2019

  30. [31]

    N., Guo, Y

    Chen, S., Caballero, R. N., Guo, Y . J., et al. 2021, Mon. Not. R . Astron. Soc., 508, 4970 5

    2021

  31. [32]

    2001, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10, 213 20

    Chevallier, M., & Polarski, D. 2001, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10, 213 20

    2001

  32. [33]

    2025, Astrophys

    Chu, Q., Lu, Y ., & Y u, S. 2025, Astrophys. J., 980, 181 15

    2025

  33. [34]

    2022, Mon

    Chu, Q., Y u, S., & Lu, Y . 2022, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 509, 1557 15

    2022

  34. [35]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    Colpi, M., Danzmann, K., Hewitson, M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-p rints, arXiv:2402.07571 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [36]

    Cutler, C., & Holz, D. E. 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 80, 104009 11, 24 Del Pozzo, W . 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 043011 12 Del Pozzo, W ., Li, T. G. F., & Messenger, C. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 043502 13

    2009

  36. [37]

    E., Hall, P

    Dewdney, P . E., Hall, P . J., Schilizzi, R. T., & Lazio, T. J. L.W . 2009, IEEE Proceedings, 97, 1482 5, 11 Di V alentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., et al. 2021, Classical an d Quantum Gravity, 38, 153001 17

    2009

  37. [38]

    2019, JCAP , 2019, 03 3 12

    Ding, X., Biesiada, M., Zheng, X., et al. 2019, JCAP , 2019, 03 3 12

    2019

  38. [39]

    2025, Philosophical Transactions of the Roy al Society of London Series A, 383, 20240022 2 EPTA Collaboration, Antoniadis, J., Babak, S., et al

    Efstathiou, G. 2025, Philosophical Transactions of the Roy al Society of London Series A, 383, 20240022 2 EPTA Collaboration, Antoniadis, J., Babak, S., et al. 2023, Astron. Astrophys., 678, A48 5 Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cos mology 37

    2025

  39. [40]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    Evans, M., Adhikari, R. X., Afle, C., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prin ts, arXiv:2109.09882 3, 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [41]

    M., & Holz, D

    Ezquiaga, J. M., & Holz, D. E. 2022, Phys. Rev. Lett., 129, 061 102 15, 16

    2022

  41. [42]

    Fan, X., Messenger, C., & Heng, I. S. 2014, Astrophys. J., 795 , 43 8

    2014

  42. [43]

    Fan, X., Messenger, C., & Heng, I. S. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1 19, 181102 8

    2017

  43. [44]

    M., Fishbach, M., Y e, J., & Holz, D

    Farr, W . M., Fishbach, M., Y e, J., & Holz, D. E. 2019, Astrophys. J. Lett., 883, L42 15

    2019

  44. [45]

    M., Peiris, H

    Feeney, S. M., Peiris, H. V ., Williamson, A. R., et al. 2019, P hys. Rev. Lett., 122, 061105 17

    2019

  45. [46]

    Ferreira, P . G. 2019, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 57, 335 2

    2019

  46. [47]

    Fishbach, M., & Holz, D. E. 2017, Astrophys. J. Lett., 851, L2 5 15

    2017

  47. [48]

    S., & Backer, D

    Foster, R. S., & Backer, D. C. 1990, Astrophys. J., 361, 300 5

    1990

  48. [49]

    Freedman, W . L. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0169 17

    2017

  49. [50]

    L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al

    Fryer, C. L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al. 2012, A strophys. J., 749, 91 15

    2012

  50. [51]

    M., Reardon, D

    Goncharov, B., Shannon, R. M., Reardon, D. J., et al. 2021, As trophys. J. Lett., 917, L19 5

    2021

  51. [52]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 881 24 G¨ otz, D., Paul, J., Basa, S., et al

    Gong, Y ., Luo, J., & Wang, B. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 881 24 G¨ otz, D., Paul, J., Basa, S., et al. 2009, in Gamma-ray Burst : Sixth Huntsville Symposium, American Institute of Physics Conference Series , vol. 1133, edited by C. Meegan, C. Kouveliotou, & N. Gehrels , 25–30 (AIP) 27

    2021

  52. [53]

    J., Ford, K

    Graham, M. J., Ford, K. E. S., McKernan, B., et al. 2020, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 251102 10

    2020

  53. [54]

    J., Kulkarni, S

    Graham, M. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Bellm, E. C., et al. 2019, Publ . Astron. Soc. Pac., 131, 078001 25

    2019

  54. [55]

    2023, JCAP , 2023, 023 15

    Gray, R., Beirnaert, F., Karathanasis, C., et al. 2023, JCAP , 2023, 023 15

    2023

  55. [56]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1879 2

    Gu, G., Wang, X., Wang, Y ., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1879 2

    2025

  56. [57]

    2017, Astrophy s

    Guidorzi, C., Margutti, R., Brout, D., et al. 2017, Astrophy s. J. Lett., 851, L36 8

    2017

  57. [58]

    M., Fritschel, P ., Shaddock, D

    Harry, G. M., Fritschel, P ., Shaddock, D. A., Folkner, W ., & P hinney, E. S. 2006, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, 4887 4, 24

    2006

  58. [59]

    2026, Astrophys

    He, L., Liu, Z.-Y ., Niu, R., et al. 2026, Astrophys. J. Suppl. , 282, 13 10

    2026

  59. [60]

    Searching for Electromagnetic Counterpart Candidates to GW231123

    He, L., Zhu, L.-G., Liu, Z.-Y ., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.05144 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [61]

    Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E. 2002, Astrophys. J., 567, 532 15

    2002

  61. [62]

    D., Lang, R

    Hinderer, T., Lackey, B. D., Lang, R. N., & Read, J. S. 2010, Ph ys. Rev. D, 81, 123016 13

    2010

  62. [63]

    E., & Hughes, S

    Holz, D. E., & Hughes, S. A. 2005, Astrophys. J., 629, 15 5

    2005

  63. [64]

    2017, National Science Review, 4, 6854, 23 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S

    Hu, W .-R., & Wu, Y .-L. 2017, National Science Review, 4, 6854, 23 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, Astrophys. J., 873, 111 11, 25, 27

    2017

  64. [65]

    2026, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 69, 220401 2

    Jin, S.-J., Song, J.-Y ., Sun, T.-Y ., et al. 2026, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 69, 220401 2

    2026

  65. [66]

    2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 220412 24 Kagra Collaboration, Akutsu, T., Ando, M., et al

    Jin, S.-J., Zhang, Y .-Z., Song, J.-Y ., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang , X. 2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 220412 24 Kagra Collaboration, Akutsu, T., Ando, M., et al. 2019, Natu re Astronomy, 3, 35 3

    2024

  66. [67]

    2017, Nature, 551, 80 10

    Kasen, D., Metzger, B., Barnes, J., Quataert, E., & Ramirez- Ruiz, E. 2017, Nature, 551, 80 10

    2017

  67. [68]

    2006, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, S125 4, 24 38 W

    Kawamura, S., Nakamura, T., Ando, M., et al. 2006, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, S125 4, 24 38 W. Zhao et al

    2006

  68. [69]

    Kiziltan, B., Kottas, A., De Y oreo, M., & Thorsett, S. E. 2013 , Astrophys. J., 778, 66 14

    2013

  69. [70]

    2016, Phys

    Klein, A., Barausse, E., Sesana, A., et al. 2016, Phys. Rev. D , 93, 024003 6, 12, 21

    2016

  70. [71]

    2021, Mon

    Laghi, D., Tamanini, N., Del Pozzo, W ., et al. 2021, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 508, 4512 5

    2021

  71. [72]

    2022, Phys

    Leandro, H., Marra, V ., & Sturani, R. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 023523 16

    2022

  72. [73]

    2025, Reports on Progress in Physics, 88, 056901 4, 23

    Li, E.-K., Liu, S., Torres-Orjuela, A., et al. 2025, Reports on Progress in Physics, 88, 056901 4, 23

    2025

  73. [74]

    Q., Wen, X

    Li, X. Q., Wen, X. Y ., An, Z. H., et al. 2022, Radiation Detecti on Technology and Methods, 6, 12 27

    2022

  74. [75]

    2024, Astrophys

    Li, Y .-J., Tang, S.-P ., Wang, Y .-Z., & Fan, Y .-Z. 2024, Astrophys. J., 976, 153 15

    2024

  75. [76]

    201 7, Nature Communications, 8, 1148 8, 9 LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Aasi, J., Abbott, B

    Liao, K., Fan, X.-L., Ding, X., Biesiada, M., & Zhu, Z.-H. 201 7, Nature Communications, 8, 1148 8, 9 LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Aasi, J., Abbott, B. P ., et al . 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 074001 3

    2015

  76. [77]

    Linder, E. V . 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 091301 20

    2003

  77. [78]

    2026, Astrophys

    Liu, Z., Xu, Z., Jiang, J.-a., et al. 2026, Astrophys. J. Lett ., 1000, L20 10, 25

    2026

  78. [79]

    2023, Astrophys

    Liu, Z.-Y ., Lin, Z.-Y ., Y u, J.-M., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 947, 59 10

    2023

  79. [80]

    2025, JCAP , 2025, 0 62 2

    Louis, T., La Posta, A., Atkins, Z., et al. 2025, JCAP , 2025, 0 62 2

    2025

  80. [81]

    2026, Living Reviews in Relat ivity, 29, 1 4, 23

    Luo, J., An, H., Bian, L., et al. 2026, Living Reviews in Relat ivity, 29, 1 4, 23

    2026

Showing first 80 references.