Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Solar cycle variation of ν_(rm max) in helioseismic data and its implications for asteroseismology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.10949 v2 pith:MOHOUTWP submitted 2020-01-29 astro-ph.SR

Solar cycle variation of ν_(rm max) in helioseismic data and its implications for asteroseismology

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords dataasteroseismologysolaractivitycentdopplerfrequencypower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The frequency, $\nu_{\rm max}$, at which the envelope of pulsation power peaks for solar-like oscillators is an important quantity in asteroseismology. We measure $\nu_{\rm max}$ for the Sun using 25 years of Sun-as-a-Star Doppler velocity observations with the Birmingham Solar-Oscillations Network (BiSON), by fitting a simple model to binned power spectra of the data. We also apply the fit to Sun-as-a-Star Doppler velocity data from GONG and GOLF, and photometry data from VIRGO/SPM on the ESA/NASA SOHO spacecraft. We discover a weak but nevertheless significant positive correlation of the solar $\nu_{\rm max}$ with solar activity. The uncovered shift between low and high activity, of $\simeq 25\,\rm \mu Hz$, translates to an uncertainty of 0.8 per cent in radius and 2.4 per cent in mass, based on direct use of asteroseismic scaling relations calibrated to the Sun. The mean $\nu_{\rm max}$ in the different datasets is also clearly offset in frequency. Our results flag the need for caution when using $\nu_{\rm max}$ in asteroseismology.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.