Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 cited by

Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.11279 v5 pith:KXRTGZHV submitted 2017-11-30 stat.ML

Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)

classification stat.ML
keywords cavsclassificationconceptimageinternalstatetestingactivation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The interpretation of deep learning models is a challenge due to their size, complexity, and often opaque internal state. In addition, many systems, such as image classifiers, operate on low-level features rather than high-level concepts. To address these challenges, we introduce Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs), which provide an interpretation of a neural net's internal state in terms of human-friendly concepts. The key idea is to view the high-dimensional internal state of a neural net as an aid, not an obstacle. We show how to use CAVs as part of a technique, Testing with CAVs (TCAV), that uses directional derivatives to quantify the degree to which a user-defined concept is important to a classification result--for example, how sensitive a prediction of "zebra" is to the presence of stripes. Using the domain of image classification as a testing ground, we describe how CAVs may be used to explore hypotheses and generate insights for a standard image classification network as well as a medical application.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Are Two Networks the Same? Tensor Similarity for Mechanistic Interpretability

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Tensor similarity is a symmetry-invariant metric that measures functional equivalence between tensor-based networks using a recursive algorithm for cross-layer mechanisms.

  2. From Mechanistic to Compositional Interpretability

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Compositional interpretability defines explanations as commuting syntactic-semantic mapping pairs grounded in compositionality and minimum description length, with compressive refinement and a parsimony theorem guaran...

  3. From Mechanistic to Compositional Interpretability

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper introduces compositional interpretability as a category-theoretic framework that casts mechanistic explanations as commuting syntactic-semantic mappings optimized under faithfulness and complexity constraint...

  4. Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry -- a deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions

    physics.chem-ph 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Deep neural network predicts molecular wavefunctions in atomic orbital basis from which quantum properties are derived at force-field efficiency.

  5. CLIF: Concept-Level Influence Functions for Transparent Bottleneck Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CLIF applies influence functions to pinpoint influential samples and concepts in CBMs on CEBaB and Yelp datasets, enabling performance restoration via adjustments without retraining.

  6. Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A latent mediation framework with sparse autoencoders enables non-additive token-level influence attribution in LLMs by learning orthogonal features and back-propagating attributions.

  7. FeatMap: Understanding image manipulation in the feature space and its implications for feature space geometry

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Linear mappings in feature space can reconstruct a wide range of image manipulations including semantic edits, suggesting that feature representations are approximately linearly organized.

  8. Finding Meaning in Embeddings: Concept Separation Curves

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Concept Separation Curves provide a classifier-independent method to visualize and quantify how sentence embeddings distinguish conceptual meaning from syntactic variations across languages and domains.

  9. UNBOX: Unveiling Black-box visual models with Natural-language

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    UNBOX recovers interpretable text concepts that maximally activate classes in black-box vision models by recasting activation maximization as semantic search with LLMs and diffusion models.

  10. Steering LLMs? Actually, Sparse Autoencoders can outperform simple baselines

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Sparse autoencoders with supervised feature selection achieve near-LoRA performance on the AxBench steering benchmark and identify causal features.

  11. CLIF: Concept-Level Influence Functions for Transparent Bottleneck Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CLIF applies influence functions to pinpoint influential training samples and key concepts in Concept Bottleneck Models, enabling data debugging and behavioral insights on CEBaB and Yelp datasets.

  12. Generative Counterfactual Introspection for Explainable Deep Learning

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A generative-model-driven introspection method produces counterfactual image edits to explain deep neural network predictions on MNIST and CelebA.

  13. Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Interpretation of Food Models: a Review

    cs.AI 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey proposing a taxonomy of XAI techniques for food quality research organized by data types and explanation methods.

  14. Unexplainability and Incomprehensibility of Artificial Intelligence

    cs.CY 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Advanced AI systems are unexplainable in full and produce explanations that humans cannot comprehend.