Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Measuring Dark Energy Properties with Photometrically Classified Pan-STARRS Supernovae. II. Cosmological Parameters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1710.00846 v3 pith:3IQJ3Q5Y submitted 2017-10-02 astro-ph.CO

Measuring Dark Energy Properties with Photometrically Classified Pan-STARRS Supernovae. II. Cosmological Parameters

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmologicalcontaminationpan-starrsparametersconstraintssystematicuncertaintybayesian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We use 1169 Pan-STARRS supernovae (SNe) and 195 low-$z$ ($z < 0.1$) SNe Ia to measure cosmological parameters. Though most Pan-STARRS SNe lack spectroscopic classifications, in a previous paper (I) we demonstrated that photometrically classified SNe can be used to infer unbiased cosmological parameters by using a Bayesian methodology that marginalizes over core-collapse (CC) SN contamination. Our sample contains nearly twice as many SNe as the largest previous SN Ia compilation. Combining SNe with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) constraints from Planck, we measure the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ to be -0.989$\pm$0.057 (stat$+$sys). If $w$ evolves with redshift as $w(a) = w_0 + w_a(1-a)$, we find $w_0 = -0.912 \pm 0.149$ and $w_a =$ -0.513$\pm$0.826. These results are consistent with cosmological parameters from the Joint Lightcurve Analysis and the Pantheon sample. We try four different photometric classification priors for Pan-STARRS SNe and two alternate ways of modeling CC SN contamination, finding that no variant gives a $w$ differing by more than 2% from the baseline measurement. The systematic uncertainty on $w$ due to marginalizing over CC SN contamination, $\sigma_w^{\textrm{CC}} = 0.012$, is the third-smallest source of systematic uncertainty in this work. We find limited (1.6$\sigma$) evidence for evolution of the SN color-luminosity relation with redshift, a possible systematic that could constitute a significant uncertainty in future high-$z$ analyses. Our data provide one of the best current constraints on $w$, demonstrating that samples with $\sim$5% CC SN contamination can give competitive cosmological constraints when the contaminating distribution is marginalized over in a Bayesian framework.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BayeSN $\times$ Dovekie: Joint Photometric Cross-calibration and SED Modelling of Type Ia Supernovae

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Joint photometric cross-calibration and SED modeling in BayeSN yields G26 model with 12% NMAD scatter reduction on DES-SN5YR supernovae at z<0.7.

  2. New Isocurvature Constraints from JWST UV Luminosity Function

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    First UVLF-based constraints on model-agnostic isocurvature power spectra for CDM, baryon, neutrino, and dark radiation modes yield consistent 95% credible envelopes over k ~ 0.5-10 Mpc^{-1}.