Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

DNF - Galaxy photometric redshift by Directional Neighbourhood Fitting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1511.07623 v2 pith:IOEOEUBM submitted 2015-11-24 astro-ph.CO

DNF - Galaxy photometric redshift by Directional Neighbourhood Fitting

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords neighbourhooddirectionalfittingphoto-zphotometricerrorestimationmeasurement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Wide field images taken in several photometric bands allow simultaneous measurement of redshifts for thousands of galaxies. A variety of algorithms to make this measurement have appeared in the last few years, the majority of which can be classified as either template or training based methods. Among the latter, nearest neighbour estimatorsstand out as one of the most successful, in terms of both precision and the quality of error estimation. In this paper we describe the Directional Neighbourhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm based on the following: a new neighbourhood metric (Directional Neighbourhood), a photo-z estimation strategy (Neighbourhood Fitting) and a method for generating the photo-z probability distribution function. We compare DNF with other well-known empirical photometric redshift tools using different public datasets (Sloan Digital Sky Survey, VIMOS VLT Deep Survey and Photo-z Accuracy Testing). DNF achieves high-quality results with reliable error.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Multi-Wavelength View of the First Type Ic-BL Supernova with an Einstein Probe X-ray Shock Breakout

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First definitive X-ray shock breakout from a Type Ic-BL supernova, with radio constraints and a rate calculation implying most such supernovae produce fainter signals than observed here.

  2. Density-Shear Baryon Acoustic Oscillation as a Cosmological Consistency Check

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GI BAO provides a robust consistency check for density BAO and shear data, with the first photometric measurement on DES Y3 showing agreement at α = 0.966 ± 0.252.

  3. Density-Shear Baryon Acoustic Oscillation as a Cosmological Consistency Check

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    First GI BAO measurement from DES Y3 photometric data yields α = 0.966 ± 0.252, consistent with density BAO α = 0.966 ± 0.037 at 0.86σ detection.

  4. From DES to KiDS: Domain adaptation for cross-survey detection of low-surface-brightness galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Domain adaptation with an ensemble of CNN and transformer models trained on DES detects 20,180 LSBGs and 434 UDGs in KiDS DR5, with structural parameters and environmental trends consistent with known samples.

  5. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2021-05 accept novelty 6.0

    DES Y3 3x2pt analysis constrains S8=0.776±0.017 and Ωm=0.339±0.032 in flat ΛCDM, consistent with Planck CMB results at p=0.13-0.48.

  6. Taming Additive Systematics via Redshift-Bin-Optimized Star-Galaxy Separation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Redshift-bin-optimized color cuts using unWISE photometry reduce stellar contamination in the DES Y3 MagLim lens sample by 1.3-5.5% varying across bins and footprint.

  7. Machine Learning Techniques for Astrophysics and Cosmology: Photometric Redshifts

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    AI techniques for photometric redshift estimation have converged and are now limited by the size, systematics, and selection effects in spectroscopic training samples rather than by methodology.