Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Charge Form Factor of the Neutron at Low Momentum Transfer from the ²vec{rm H}(vec{rm e},{rm e}'{rm n}){rm p} Reaction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0803.3827 v2 pith:PZJGRMNK submitted 2008-03-26 nucl-ex

The Charge Form Factor of the Neutron at Low Momentum Transfer from the ²vec{rm H}(vec{rm e},{rm e}'{rm n}){rm p} Reaction

classification nucl-ex
keywords factorformneutronchargeelectronsmomentumpolarizedscattered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report new measurements of the neutron charge form factor at low momentum transfer using quasielastic electrodisintegration of the deuteron. Longitudinally polarized electrons at an energy of 850 MeV were scattered from an isotopically pure, highly polarized deuterium gas target. The scattered electrons and coincident neutrons were measured by the Bates Large Acceptance Spectrometer Toroid (BLAST) detector. The neutron form factor ratio $G^{n}_{E}/G^{n}_{M}$ was extracted from the beam-target vector asymmetry $A_{ed}^{V}$ at four-momentum transfers $Q^{2}=0.14$, 0.20, 0.29 and 0.42 (GeV/c)$^{2}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from the instanton vacuum

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nucleon EM form factors computed in instanton vacuum model with parameters fixed by saddle-point equation yield proton charge radius 0.841 fm matching muonic hydrogen and good agreement on Q2 dependence of ratios.