Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

LISA detections of massive black hole inspirals: parameter extraction errors due to inaccurate template waveforms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0707.2982 v2 pith:K4QKPDOU submitted 2007-07-20 gr-qc

LISA detections of massive black hole inspirals: parameter extraction errors due to inaccurate template waveforms

classification gr-qc
keywords errorstheoreticalmagnitudeshouldsnrswillbecauseblack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The planned Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is expected to detect the inspiral and merger of massive black hole binaries (MBHBs) at z <~ 5 with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of hundreds to thousands. Because of these high SNRs, and because these SNRs accrete over periods of weeks to months, it should be possible to extract the physical parameters of these systems with high accuracy; for instance, for a ~ 10^6 Msun MBHBs at z = 1 it should be possible to determine the two masses to ~ 0.1% and the sky location to ~ 1 degree. However, those are just the errors due to noise: there will be additional "theoretical" errors due to inaccuracies in our best model waveforms, which are still only approximate. The goal of this paper is to estimate the typical magnitude of these theoretical errors. We develop mathematical tools for this purpose, and apply them to a somewhat simplified version of the MBHB problem, in which we consider just the inspiral part of the waveform and neglect spin-induced precession, eccentricity, and PN amplitude corrections. For this simplified version, we estimate that theoretical uncertainties in sky position will typically be ~ 1 degree, i.e., comparable to the statistical uncertainty. For the mass and spin parameters, our results suggest that while theoretical errors will be rather small absolutely, they could still dominate over statistical errors (by roughly an order of magnitude) for the strongest sources. The tools developed here should be useful for estimating the magnitude of theoretical errors in many other problems in gravitational-wave astronomy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Joint inference of line-of-sight acceleration and orbital eccentricity in neutron-star--black-hole binaries

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    All five NSBH events are consistent with zero line-of-sight acceleration; the joint posterior for GW200105_162426 disfavors both zero LOSA and zero eccentricity at 90% credibility.

  2. Temporal Correlation Statistic for Intrinsic Phase Fluctuation in Double White Dwarf Gravitational-Wave Signals

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces a minimal quadratic statistic to isolate temporal correlations in intrinsic phase fluctuations of double white dwarf binaries and derives an analytic SNR scaling with total observation time and intrinsic co...

  3. Constraints on Line-of-Sight Acceleration from O1-O4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    All known compact binary mergers show line-of-sight accelerations consistent with zero under a new time-domain Doppler-shift model, with current detectors only sensitive to high-acceleration scenarios.

  4. Population-level correlations in Bayesian statistics: an illustrative model for gravitational-wave astronomy

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An idealized Gaussian model demonstrates that single-event correlations inflate uncertainties in population correlations and that catalog-wide correlated biases can be misread as population correlations.

  5. Eccentric Stellar-mass Binary Black Holes: Population, Detectability, and Waveform Analysis in the LISA and LIGO Era

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations of dynamical channels predict ~36 eccentric stellar-mass BBHs detectable by LISA in the Milky Way at SNR>1 over 10 years, a local merger rate of ~9 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, and hundreds of faint extragalactic mHz...

  6. Eccentric Stellar-mass Binary Black Holes: Population, Detectability, and Waveform Analysis in the LISA and LIGO Era

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations of dynamically formed eccentric stellar-mass BBHs predict dozens of LISA-detectable sources in the Milky Way, hundreds of low-SNR extragalactic mHz sources, a merger rate of ~9 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, and potent...

  7. The impact of waveform systematics and Gaussian noise on the interpretation of GW231123

    gr-qc 2026-01 accept novelty 4.0

    The high mass and high spin magnitudes inferred for GW231123 using NRSur7dq4 are robust to waveform systematics and Gaussian noise.