Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 86 references

Spin-orbit coupling generates geometric squeezing in rotating pseudospin Bose-Einstein condensates through effective two-phonon transitions

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 03:37 UTC pith:BTF67WVK

load-bearing objection SOC gives a plausible new route to geometric squeezing in rotating BECs via virtual spin flips, but the LLL projection and effective Hamiltonian still need explicit checks. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.30187 v1 pith:BTF67WVK submitted 2026-06-29 cond-mat.quant-gas

Spin-orbit coupling induced geometric squeezing in rotating Bose-Einstein condensates

Fei Zhu , Chunxia Guo , Rui Zhang , Lianghui Huang , Ren Zhang , Li Chen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords spin-orbit couplinggeometric squeezingBose-Einstein condensatelowest Landau leveltwo-phonon transitionsrotating quantum gasespseudospin-1/2squeezed states
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes using spin-orbit coupling to generate geometrically squeezed states in rotating Bose-Einstein condensates, as an alternative to anisotropic trapping potentials. The coupling creates virtual spin-flip processes that produce effective two-phonon transitions inside the lowest Landau level, resulting in exponential squeezing dynamics for each spin component. A subsequent π/2 spin rotation can link the two spin channels to create two-mode geometric squeezing. The authors also map out interaction strengths that keep the squeezing robust. A sympathetic reader would care because squeezed states matter for quantum metrology and sensing, and this route works in spinor gases that are already studied in labs.

Core claim

The spin-orbit coupling enables effective two-phonon transitions within the lowest Landau level via virtual spin-flip processes, leading to exponential squeezing dynamics in both spin components. By applying a π/2 spin rotation, the two spin channels can be coherently coupled to produce two-mode geometric squeezing. Interatomic interactions can be tuned to achieve robust squeezing.

What carries the argument

SOC-enabled effective two-phonon transitions within the lowest Landau level via virtual spin-flip processes, which produce the exponential squeezing dynamics

Load-bearing premise

The atoms remain confined to the lowest Landau level and interatomic interactions are tuned to the specific regime that allows squeezing to develop without disruption

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurements of the orbital squeezing parameter in a rotating SOC BEC that either show or fail to show the predicted exponential growth for chosen SOC strength and rotation frequency

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Exponential squeezing dynamics appear in both spin components
  • Two-mode geometric squeezing appears after a π/2 spin rotation couples the channels
  • Robust squeezing persists when interatomic interactions are tuned to the identified parameter regime
  • Geometric squeezing becomes realizable in spinor quantum gases without anisotropic traps

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experiments could test this without building new anisotropic potentials, using existing SOC and rotation setups
  • The approach may extend to generating squeezing in other spin structures or for multi-mode states
  • It offers a potential route to squeezed states useful for precision measurements in ultracold atom systems

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes generating geometric squeezing in rotating pseudospin-1/2 BECs via spin-orbit coupling rather than anisotropic traps. It claims that SOC induces effective two-phonon transitions inside the lowest Landau level through virtual spin-flip processes, producing exponential squeezing dynamics in each spin component; a subsequent π/2 spin rotation then couples the channels to yield two-mode geometric squeezing. The work also maps the effect of interatomic interactions and identifies parameter windows where squeezing remains robust.

Significance. If the LLL-projected effective Hamiltonian and the identified interaction regime are valid, the proposal supplies a new, SOC-based route to orbital squeezing that could be realized in existing spinor-gas experiments and might extend to quantum-metrology or many-body simulation applications. The explicit treatment of interaction effects is a constructive element.

major comments (2)
  1. [Effective Hamiltonian / LLL projection (likely §III)] The central claim rests on the existence of an LLL-projected effective two-phonon squeezing Hamiltonian generated by second-order virtual spin-flip processes. The manuscript must supply the explicit projection, the perturbative expansion parameter (SOC strength versus cyclotron gap), and quantitative bounds showing that higher-Landau-level admixture and residual single-phonon terms remain negligible throughout the quoted parameter window; without these the exponential-dynamics prediction cannot be verified.
  2. [Interaction analysis (likely §IV)] The robustness window against interactions is stated to exist, yet no explicit comparison is given between the two-phonon squeezing rate and the interaction-induced dephasing or heating rates inside that window. A concrete estimate or numerical check of this hierarchy is required to substantiate the claim that squeezing survives for experimentally relevant times.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the effective squeezing parameter and the two-mode quadratures should be defined once and used consistently; several symbols appear to be introduced only in figure captions.
  2. [Two-mode section] The abstract states that a π/2 spin rotation produces two-mode squeezing, but the corresponding unitary and its action on the LLL states are not written explicitly in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The two major comments identify important points that require clarification and additional material. We address each below and will incorporate the requested details in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Effective Hamiltonian / LLL projection (likely §III)] The central claim rests on the existence of an LLL-projected effective two-phonon squeezing Hamiltonian generated by second-order virtual spin-flip processes. The manuscript must supply the explicit projection, the perturbative expansion parameter (SOC strength versus cyclotron gap), and quantitative bounds showing that higher-Landau-level admixture and residual single-phonon terms remain negligible throughout the quoted parameter window; without these the exponential-dynamics prediction cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the LLL projection and quantitative bounds on the perturbative validity are necessary for a self-contained presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that (i) performs the second-order Schrieffer-Wolff transformation projecting onto the LLL, (ii) identifies the small parameter as the ratio of the SOC strength to the cyclotron gap, and (iii) supplies both analytic estimates and numerical checks demonstrating that higher-Landau-level admixtures remain below a few percent and that residual single-phonon terms are suppressed throughout the quoted parameter window. These additions will make the exponential-dynamics prediction directly verifiable from the text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Interaction analysis (likely §IV)] The robustness window against interactions is stated to exist, yet no explicit comparison is given between the two-phonon squeezing rate and the interaction-induced dephasing or heating rates inside that window. A concrete estimate or numerical check of this hierarchy is required to substantiate the claim that squeezing survives for experimentally relevant times.

    Authors: We accept that a direct rate comparison is required to substantiate the robustness claim. In the revision we will augment §IV with explicit estimates (both analytic and, where feasible, numerical) that compare the two-phonon squeezing rate to the leading interaction-induced dephasing and heating rates inside the identified parameter window. This will include a quantitative hierarchy showing that squeezing dynamics remain dominant for times relevant to current spinor-gas experiments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation not load-bearing; LLL projection and effective Hamiltonian rest on standard methods

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a proposal for SOC-induced geometric squeezing via virtual spin-flip processes in the LLL. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any uniqueness theorem or ansatz reduce to self-citation. The derivation invokes standard LLL projection and perturbative virtual processes without redefining inputs as outputs. A score of 2 accounts for possible routine self-citations in the full text that are not load-bearing for the main result, consistent with the reader's assessment. The chain remains self-contained against external BEC/SOC benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on the standard lowest-Landau-level projection for rotating BECs and the validity of an effective two-phonon model derived from SOC; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • SOC strength and rotation frequency
    These set the scale of the effective two-phonon coupling and must be chosen to remain within the LLL regime.
  • interaction parameters
    The abstract states that parameters are identified where interactions permit robust squeezing; these are tuned rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The rotating BEC can be projected onto the lowest Landau level without significant mixing from higher levels.
    Invoked implicitly when stating that SOC acts within the LLL.
  • domain assumption Virtual spin-flip processes generate an effective two-phonon Hamiltonian.
    Central to the claimed exponential squeezing dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5694 in / 1437 out tokens · 33998 ms · 2026-06-30T03:37:53.179538+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Squeezed states play a key role in diverse frontiers of quantum physics. Geometrically squeezed states, a squeezed state in the orbital phase space of rotating Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC), have been conventionally generated by anisotropic trapping potentials. In this work, we propose a different route to generate geometric squeezing via spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in a pseudospin-1/2 BEC. We show that the SOC enables effective two-phonon transitions within the lowest Landau level via virtual spin-flip processes, leading to exponential squeezing dynamics in both spin components. Furthermore, by applying a $\pi/2$ spin rotation, the two spin channels can be coherently coupled to produce two-mode geometric squeezing. We also investigate the influence of interatomic interactions on squeezing performance and identify parameters where robust squeezing can be achieved. Our work provides a viable pathway to realize and manipulate geometric squeezing in spinor quantum gases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30187 by Chunxia Guo, Fei Zhu, Lianghui Huang, Li Chen, Ren Zhang, Rui Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Landau level diagrams for the spin-orbit coupled rot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Squeezing dynamics for the transversely polarized i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic illustration of the generation of two- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Squeezing dynamics of interacting BECs. (a) Time evo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The inference of single-mode (a) and two-mode (b) geo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references

  1. [1]

    In contrast, the cyclotron mode remains unsqueezed due to the dominating term a†a in Eq

    at Ω = ω , they take the analytic form ∆ 2 min(t) = ∆ 2 SQLe− 2ζt, ∆ 2 max(t) = ∆ 2 SQLe2ζt, (12) where ∆ 2 SQL = l2 B/ 2 is the SQL. In contrast, the cyclotron mode remains unsqueezed due to the dominating term a†a in Eq. (

  2. [2]

    This term induces rapid rotation of the ξ-η phase space, thereby suppressing the for- mation of squeezing in the cyclotron mode

    with strength ω + = 2ω ≫ ζ. This term induces rapid rotation of the ξ-η phase space, thereby suppressing the for- mation of squeezing in the cyclotron mode. III. SPIN-ORBIT COUPLING INDUCED GEOMETRIC SQUEEZING A. Effective Hamiltonian We now turn to an isotropic two-component BEC (pseudospin-1/2 system) subject to the Raman-induced SOC. We will demonstrat...

  3. [3]

    and I is a 2 × 2 identity matrix. The last term αp xσx characterizes the SOC with σx,z being the Pauli matrices, px being the momentum operator, which can be expanded in terms of the ladder operators as px = i√ mω 2 [ (a† − a) + (b† − b) ] , (14) andα being the strength; J being the Raman Rabi frequency. This form of SOC can typically be realized through ...

  4. [4]

    Next, we turn on a weak SOC and treat H ′ ≡ αp xσx as a perturbation (i.e., αp 0 ≪ J with p0 ∼ √ mω being the oscillator momentum scale)

    In particular, within the LLL manifold {|0,n b,σ ⟩} one has E0, ↑ = ω − J andE0, ↓ =ω +J. Next, we turn on a weak SOC and treat H ′ ≡ αp xσx as a perturbation (i.e., αp 0 ≪ J with p0 ∼ √ mω being the oscillator momentum scale). Therefore, the effect ofH ′ on the LLL manifold is described by degenerate perturbation theor y. We first focus on the LLL of the ...

  5. [5]

    The relation between the modes before and after the π/ 2 spin rotation [illustrated in Fig

    and ( 18) with constant terms being neglected] H LLL eff = ζ 2 [ (b† ↑ )2 +b2 ↑ ] − ζb † ↑b↑ − ζ 2 [ (b† ↓ )2 +b2 ↓ ] +ζb † ↓b↓, (24) where the quadratic terms have opposite signs for b↑ and b↓ , corresponding to orthogonal single-mode squeezing direc - tions as mentioned before. The relation between the modes before and after the π/ 2 spin rotation [illus...

  6. [6]

    Rewriting Eq. (24) in terms of c andd yields H LLL eff = −ζ(c†d† +cd) +ζ(c†d +d†c), (25) where the first two terms form the standard two-mode squeez- ing Hamiltonian, whereas the last two terms are mode- exchange terms which originate from the residual diagonal contributions ∝ b† σbσ in Eq. ( 24). The mode-exchange term is of the same order as the two-mode ...

  7. [7]

    For the two-mode squeezing part in Eq

    and (18)], the generators are ˆK (σ ) 0 = (b† σbσ + 1 2 )/ 2, ˆK (σ ) + = (b† σ )2/ 2, and ˆK (σ ) − = b2 σ/ 2 withσ ∈ {↑ , ↓}. For the two-mode squeezing part in Eq. ( 25), the generators become ˆK0 = (c†c +d†d + 1)/ 2, ˆK+ =c†d†, and ˆK− =cd. The two squeezing scenarios correspond to different represen- tations of the su(1, 1) algebra, which are connect...

  8. [8]

    5 √ ω/m and Ω = 0 . 6ω . The initial state is the longitudinally polarized state for panel (a) and the transversely polarize d state for panel (b). withgσσ andg↑↓ denoting the intra-spin and inter-spin inter- actions, respectively. In our following calculations, we s im- ply take g↑↑ = g↓↓ = g↑↓ = g. This condition can be nat- urally satisfied in the most ...

  9. [9]

    6ω , and then propagate the GP equa- tion from the transversely polarized initial state Ψ (r, 0) = (φ g(r),φ g(r))T/ √

    5 √ ω/m and Ω = 0 . 6ω , and then propagate the GP equa- tion from the transversely polarized initial state Ψ (r, 0) = (φ g(r),φ g(r))T/ √

  10. [10]

    5(b) shows the minimal quadra- ture fluctuations ∆ 2 σ, min for both the spin-up and spin-down components

    Fig. 5(b) shows the minimal quadra- ture fluctuations ∆ 2 σ, min for both the spin-up and spin-down components. In addition, we also display the minimum joint- noise factor Smin (quantified on the right axis), which cor- responds to the two-mode squeezing protocol illustrated in Fig. 4(a). As can be seen from the figure, the spin-up fluc- tuation ∆ 2 ↑, min e...

  11. [11]

    and the corresponding cyclotron quadrature P (σ ) θ, cyc = ξσ cosθ +ησ sinθ. Since the two sectors are statistically inde- pendent, the real-space varianceW 2 σ (θ,t ) ≡ ⟨ r(σ ) 2 θ ⟩−⟨ r(σ ) θ ⟩2 along the direction θ satisfies W 2 σ (θ,t ) = ∆ 2 σ (θ,t ) + ⟨P (σ ) 2 θ, cyc⟩. (32) For a Gaussian state in the LLL regime—which corre- sponds exactly to the n...

  12. [12]

    ( 32) remains valid

    nor the de- composition Eq. ( 32) remains valid. Therefore, developing measurement protocols for the guiding-center fluctuations of non-Gaussian states is an interesting problem that deserve s further investigation. We numerically verify the density-based inference schemes in Eqs. (33) and (35), and present the inferred results as dashed lines in Figs. 6(a...

  13. [13]

    from the rotating BEC Hamiltonian with weak anisotropic confinement. Using the Baker–Campbell– Hausdorff formula, one finds that G leaves the spatial coordi- nates invariant, GxG† =x, GyG † =y, (A1) while the canonical momenta are shifted linearly in κ, GpxG† =px +κmωy, Gp yG† =py +κmωx. (A2) Substituting Eq. ( A2) into the full Hamiltonian p2/ (2m) + V (r)...

  14. [14]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  15. [15]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum optics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    S. L. Braunstein and P . van Loock, Quantum information wi th continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

    2005

  17. [17]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P . Cappellaro, Quantum sens ing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum informa - tion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012)

    2012

  19. [19]

    L.-A. Wu, H. J. Kimble, J. L. Hall, and H. Wu, Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion, Phys. Rev . Lett. 57, 2520 (1986)

    1986

  20. [20]

    L.-A. Wu, M. Xiao, and H. J. Kimble, Squeezed states of lig ht from an optical parametric oscillator, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1465 (1987)

    1987

  21. [21]

    R. E. Slusher, L. W. Hollberg, B. Y urke, J. C. Mertz, and J. F. V alley, Observation of squeezed states generated by four-w ave mixing in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2409 (1985)

    1985

  22. [22]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavit y op- tomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  23. [23]

    T. P . Purdy, R. W. Peterson, and C. A. Regal, Observation of radiation pressure shot noise on a macroscopic object, Scie nce 10 339, 801 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kron- wald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator, Science 349, 952 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Kienzler, C

    D. Kienzler, C. Fl¨ uhmann, V . Negnevitsky, H.-Y . Lo, M. Marinelli, D. Nadlinger, and J. P . Home, Observation of quan - tum interference between separated mechanical oscillator wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 140402 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    Fl¨ uhmann, T

    C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V . Negnevitsk y, K. Mehta, and J. P . Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion me- chanical oscillator, Nature 566, 513 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Julsgaard, A

    B. Julsgaard, A. Kozhekin, and E. S. Polzik, Experiment al long- lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects, Nature 413, 400 (2001)

    2001

  28. [28]

    Appel, E

    J. Appel, E. Figueroa, D. Korystov, M. Lobino, and A. I. Lvovsky, Quantum memory for squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093602 (2008)

    2008

  29. [29]

    Eichler, D

    C. Eichler, D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, M. Baur, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, S. Filipp, and A. Wallraff, Observation of two-mode squeezing in the microwave frequency domain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113601 (2011)

    2011

  30. [30]

    E. P . Menzel, R. Di Candia, F. Deppe, P . Eder, L. Zhong, M. Ihmig, M. Haeberlein, A. Baust, E. Hoffmann, D. Ballester, K . Inomata, T. Yamamoto, Y . Nakamura, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Path entanglement of continuous-variable quantu m microwaves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 250502 (2012)

    2012

  31. [31]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, A gravitational wave ob serva- tory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nat. Ph ys. 7, 962 (2011)

    2011

  32. [32]

    Furusawa, J

    A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuch s, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, Unconditional quantum teleportat ion, Science 282, 706 (1998)

    1998

  33. [33]

    Hillery, Quantum cryptography with squeezed states , Phys

    M. Hillery, Quantum cryptography with squeezed states , Phys. Rev. A 61, 022309 (2000)

    2000

  34. [34]

    Grosshans, G

    F. Grosshans, G. V an Assche, J. Wenger, R. Brouri, N. J. Cerf, and P . Grangier, Quantum key distribution using gaussian- modulated coherent states, Nature 421, 238 (2003)

    2003

  35. [35]

    R. J. Fletcher, A. Shaffer, C. C. Wilson, P . B. Patel, Z. Y an, V . Cr´ epel, B. Mukherjee, and M. W. Zwierlein, Geometric squeez- ing into the lowest Landau level, Science 372, 1318 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Sharma and E

    V . Sharma and E. J. Mueller, Rotating Bose gas dynamical ly entering the lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. A 105, 023310 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    L. Chen, F. Zhu, Z. Tang, L. Zeng, J. J. Lee, and H. Pu, Dy- namical generation of geometric squeezing in interacting B ose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 112, 043319 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Cr´ epel, R

    V . Cr´ epel, R. Yao, B. Mukherjee, R. Fletcher, and M. Zwierlein, Geometric squeezing of rotating quantum gases into the lowe st Landau level, Comptes Rendus. Physique 24, 241 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    L. Chen, F. Zhu, Y . Zhang, and H. Pu, Floquet geomet- ric squeezing in fast-rotating condensates, Phys. Rev. A 111, L011303 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein condensa tes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 647 (2009)

    2009

  41. [41]

    N. R. Cooper, Rapidly rotating atomic gases, Adv. Phys. 57, 539 (2008)

    2008

  42. [42]

    Viefers, Quantum Hall physics in rotating Bose–Eins tein condensates, J

    S. Viefers, Quantum Hall physics in rotating Bose–Eins tein condensates, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 123202 (2008)

    2008

  43. [43]

    Regnault and Th

    N. Regnault and Th. Jolicoeur, Quantum Hall fractions i n ro- tating Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 030402 (2003)

    2003

  44. [44]

    Furukawa and M

    S. Furukawa and M. Ueda, Quantum Hall states in rapidly r o- tating two-component Bose gases, Phys. Rev. A 86, 031604(R) (2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    Regnault and T

    N. Regnault and T. Senthil, Microscopic model for the bo son in- teger quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 88, 161106(R) (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    Mukherjee, A

    B. Mukherjee, A. Shaffer, P . B. Patel, Z. Yan, C. C. Wilso n, V . Cr´ epel, R. J. Fletcher, and M. Zwierlein, Crystallizati on of bosonic quantum Hall states in a rotating quantum gas, Natur e 601, 58 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Kawaguchi and M

    Y . Kawaguchi and M. Ueda, Spinor Bose–Einstein condensates, Phys. Rep. 520, 253 (2012)

    2012

  48. [48]

    Stenger, S

    J. Stenger, S. Inouye, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, H.-J. Miesne r, A. P . Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates, Nature 396, 345 (1998)

    1998

  49. [49]

    Chang, C

    M.-S. Chang, C. D. Hamley, M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, K. M . Fortier, W. Zhang, L. Y ou, and M. S. Chapman, Observation of spinor dynamics in optically trapped 87Rb Bose-Einstein con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 140403 (2004)

    2004

  50. [50]

    Schmaljohann, M

    H. Schmaljohann, M. Erhard, J. Kronj¨ ager, M. Kottke, S . V an Staa, L. Cacciapuoti, J. J. Arlt, K. Bongs, and K. Sengstock, Dynamics of F = 2 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040402 (2004)

    2004

  51. [51]

    Kronj¨ ager, C

    J. Kronj¨ ager, C. Becker, P . Navez, K. Bongs, and K. Sengstock, Magnetically tuned spin dynamics resonance, Phys. Rev. Let t. 97, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  52. [52]

    L. E. Sadler, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, M. V engalattore , and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quenched ferromagnetic spinor Bose–Einstein condensate, Na- ture 443, 312 (2006)

    2006

  53. [53]

    Isoshima, K

    T. Isoshima, K. Machida, and T. Ohmi, Quantum vortex in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 1604 (2001)

    2001

  54. [54]

    Mizushima, K

    T. Mizushima, K. Machida, and T. Kita, Mermin-Ho vortex in ferromagnetic spinor Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 030401 (2002)

    2002

  55. [55]

    Saito, Y

    H. Saito, Y . Kawaguchi, and M. Ueda, Breaking of chiral s ym- metry and spontaneous rotation in a spinor Bose-Einstein co n- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 065302 (2006)

    2006

  56. [56]

    S. W. Seo, W. J. Kwon, S. Kang, and Y . Shin, Collisional dy - namics of half-quantum vortices in a spinor Bose-Einstein c on- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 185301 (2016)

    2016

  57. [57]

    C. N. Weiler, T. W. Neely, D. R. Scherer, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P . Anderson, Spontaneous vortices in the forma - tion of Bose–Einstein condensates, Nature 455, 948 (2008)

    2008

  58. [58]

    Y .-J. Lin, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, and I. B. Spielman, Spin–orbit- coupled Bose–Einstein condensates, Nature 471, 83 (2011)

    2011

  59. [59]

    Wang, Z.-Q

    P . Wang, Z.-Q. Y u, Z. Fu, J. Miao, L. Huang, S. Chai, H. Zha i, and J. Zhang, Spin-orbit coupled degenerate Fermi gases, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 109, 095301 (2012)

    2012

  60. [60]

    L. W. Cheuk, A. T. Sommer, Z. Hadzibabic, T. Yefsah, W. S. Bakr, and M. W. Zwierlein, Spin-injection spectroscopy o f a spin-orbit coupled Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 095302 (2012)

    2012

  61. [61]

    Galitski and I

    V . Galitski and I. B. Spielman, Spin–orbit coupling in q uantum gases, Nature 494, 49 (2013)

    2013

  62. [62]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P . ¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spielman, Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 126401 (2014)

    2014

  63. [63]

    Zhai, Degenerate quantum gases with spin–orbit coup ling: a review, Rep

    H. Zhai, Degenerate quantum gases with spin–orbit coup ling: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 026001 (2015)

    2015

  64. [64]

    Zhang, W

    W. Zhang, W. Yi, and C. A. R. S´ a de Melo, Synthetic spin-orbit coupling in cold atoms (World Scientific, Singapore, 2018)

    2018

  65. [65]

    C. Wang, C. Gao, C.-M. Jian, and H. Zhai, Spin-orbit coup led spinor Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 160403 (2010)

    2010

  66. [66]

    C. Wu, I. Mondragon-Shem, and X.-F. Zhou, Unconvention al 11 Bose-Einstein condensations from spin-orbit coupling, Ch inese Phys. Lett. 28, 097102 (2011)

    2011

  67. [67]

    Ho and S

    T.-L. Ho and S. Zhang, Bose-Einstein condensates with s pin- orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 150403 (2011)

    2011

  68. [68]

    Y . Li, L. P . Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Quantum tricr iticality and phase transitions in spin-orbit coupled Bose-Einstein con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 225301 (2012)

    2012

  69. [69]

    Zheng, Z.-Q

    W. Zheng, Z.-Q. Y u, X. Cui, and H. Zhai, Properties of Bos e gases with the Raman-induced spin–orbit coupling, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 134007 (2013)

    2013

  70. [70]

    J.-R. Li, J. Lee, W. Huang, S. Burchesky, B. Shteynas, F. C ¸ . Top, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, A stripe phase with super- solid properties in spin–orbit-coupled Bose–Einstein con den- sates, Nature 543, 91 (2017)

    2017

  71. [71]

    DeMarco and H

    M. DeMarco and H. Pu, Angular spin-orbit coupling in col d atoms, Phys. Rev. A 91, 033630 (2015)

    2015

  72. [72]

    L. Chen, H. Pu, and Y . Zhang, Spin-orbit angular momentu m coupling in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 93, 013629 (2016)

    2016

  73. [73]

    K. Sun, C. Qu, and C. Zhang, Spin–orbital-angular-mome ntum coupling in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 91, 063627 (2015)

    2015

  74. [74]

    Z. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Sun, X.-T. Xu, B.-Z. Wang, S.-C. Ji, Y . Deng, S. Chen, X.-J. Liu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of two- dimensional spin-orbit coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates, Science 354, 83 (2016)

    2016

  75. [75]

    Huang, Z

    L. Huang, Z. Meng, P . Wang, P . Peng, S.-L. Zhang, L. Chen, D. Li, Q. Zhou, and J. Zhang, Experimental realization of two- dimensional synthetic spin–orbit coupling in ultracold Fe rmi gases, Nature Phys 12, 540 (2016)

    2016

  76. [76]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlin ger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topo- logical Haldane model with ultracold fermions, Nature 515, 237 (2014)

    2014

  77. [77]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. P aredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the Hofstadter hamiltonian wit h ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013)

    2013

  78. [78]

    H. Hu, B. Ramachandhran, H. Pu, and X.-J. Liu, Spin-orbi t cou- pled weakly interacting Bose-Einstein condensates in harm onic traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 010402 (2012)

    2012

  79. [79]

    L. Chen, Y . Zhang, and H. Pu, Spin-nematic vortex states in cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 195303 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    L. Chen, Y . Zhang, and H. Pu, Spin squeezing in a spin-orb it- coupled Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023317 (2020)

    2020

Showing first 80 references.