Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 71 references

Terahertz Faraday spectroscopy resolves opposite circular polarizations of CdGM states from electron- and hole-like bands in multiband iron superconductors.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 08:02 UTC pith:CXZMWA63

load-bearing objection The paper shows a workable THz Faraday route to helicity- and band-resolved CdGM spectroscopy in FeTeSe, with opposite circular polarizations for electron and hole bands.

arxiv 2606.03637 v1 pith:CXZMWA63 submitted 2026-06-02 cond-mat.supr-con

Chirality-resolved spectroscopy of Caroli-de Gennes-Matricon states in multiband FeTe_(1-x)Se_(x) superconductors

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Caroli-de Gennes-Matricon statesterahertz spectroscopyFeTe1-xSexvortex coresmultiband superconductivityFaraday rotationchiralityquasiparticle lifetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies terahertz Faraday magneto-optical spectroscopy to epitaxial thin films of FeTe1-xSex to study quantized helical Caroli-de Gennes-Matricon states inside superconducting vortices. Polarization-selective transitions allow distinction of resonances from electron-like and hole-like bands by their opposite circular polarizations. This separation yields independent values for quasiparticle lifetimes, vortex masses, coherence lengths, and upper critical fields for each band type. The measurements track how these quantities change with selenium substitution for tellurium. A reader would care because it offers a direct optical way to disentangle contributions from different bands in a complex superconductor.

Core claim

By exploiting polarization-selective optical transitions in terahertz Faraday magneto-optical spectroscopy, the authors directly resolve the helicity and band origin of vortex-core quasiparticles in FeTe1-xSex. They observe long-lived CdGM resonances with opposite circular polarizations for electron- and hole-like bands. This enables independent, band-resolved determination of quasiparticle lifetimes, vortex masses, coherence lengths, and upper critical fields, revealing their systematic evolution with isovalent substitution. The results establish terahertz magneto-optics as a direct probe of helical vortex-core excitations and provide dynamical evidence for multiband CdGM states in iron-bas

What carries the argument

Polarization-selective optical transitions that separate helical CdGM resonances by circular polarization according to their electron or hole band origin

Load-bearing premise

The observed terahertz resonances are correctly assigned to helical CdGM states originating from specific electron- versus hole-like bands, with polarization selectivity providing clean separation without significant contributions from other excitations or band mixing.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the resonances do not exhibit opposite circular polarizations or fail to show the expected magnetic-field dependence for CdGM states would falsify the band-resolved assignment.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Quasiparticle lifetimes can be measured separately for electron-like and hole-like bands.
  • Vortex masses, coherence lengths, and upper critical fields become accessible on a per-band basis.
  • These parameters evolve systematically with isovalent selenium substitution.
  • Terahertz magneto-optics provides dynamical evidence for multiband CdGM states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could apply to other multiband superconductors to separate band contributions that conventional probes mix together.
  • Band-specific coherence lengths might be compared against predictions from different pairing symmetries in iron-based materials.
  • Long-lived resonances open the possibility of using vortex-core states for time-resolved studies of quasiparticle dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the application of terahertz Faraday magneto-optical spectroscopy to epitaxial FeTe_{1-x}Se_x thin films to probe quantized helical Caroli-de Gennes-Matricon (CdGM) states in a nodeless multiband superconductor with short coherence lengths. By exploiting polarization-selective optical transitions, the authors resolve opposite circular polarizations for electron- and hole-like bands, enabling independent extraction of band-resolved quasiparticle lifetimes, vortex masses, coherence lengths, and upper critical fields, together with their evolution under isovalent substitution.

Significance. If the band assignments and lifetime/mass extractions are robust, the work provides a new polarization-resolved spectroscopic route to helical vortex-core excitations and supplies dynamical evidence for multiband CdGM states in iron-based superconductors. The clean separation of electron- versus hole-like contributions via circular polarization is a clear methodological strength.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] The abstract states that the resonances are 'long-lived' and that lifetimes are extracted, but the main text should explicitly tabulate the extracted lifetimes (with uncertainties) alongside the corresponding polarization channels and magnetic-field values to allow direct assessment of the band-resolved claims.
  2. [Methods] Figure captions and the methods section should state the precise fitting model (e.g., Lorentzian lineshape parameters, background subtraction) used to extract resonance positions and widths; without this, reproducibility of the reported coherence lengths and H_{c2} values is difficult to verify.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental observations

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study employing terahertz Faraday magneto-optical spectroscopy to observe CdGM resonances in FeTe1-xSex films. The central claims rest on direct measurements of polarization-selective transitions and opposite circular polarizations for electron- and hole-like bands, enabling band-resolved extraction of lifetimes, masses, coherence lengths, and Hc2. No derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are present in the abstract or described methodology; the results are reported as empirical observations without reduction to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the films are nodeless multiband superconductors in the moderately clean limit with short coherence lengths, plus the interpretive assumption that polarization-selective transitions cleanly isolate helical CdGM states from each band. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The epitaxial FeTe1-xSex thin films are nodeless multiband superconductors with short coherence lengths in the moderately clean limit.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the system under study.
  • domain assumption Polarization-selective optical transitions directly resolve the helicity and band origin of vortex-core quasiparticles without significant mixing from other excitations.
    Implicit in the claim that opposite circular polarizations enable independent band-resolved determinations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5722 in / 1615 out tokens · 22118 ms · 2026-06-28T08:02:51.995973+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We employ terahertz Faraday magneto-optical spectroscopy to probe the relaxation dynamics of quantized helical Caroli-de Gennes-Matricon (CdGM) states in epitaxial FeTe$_{1-x}$Se$_x$ thin films, nodeless multiband superconductors with short coherence lengths in the moderately clean limit. By exploiting polarization-selective optical transitions, we directly resolve the helicity and band origin of vortex-core quasiparticles. We observe long-lived CdGM resonances with opposite circular polarizations for electron- and hole-like bands. This enables independent, band-resolved determination of quasiparticle lifetimes, vortex masses, coherence lengths, and upper critical fields, and reveals their systematic evolution with isovalent substitution. The results establish terahertz magneto-optics as a direct probe of helical vortex-core excitations and provide dynamical evidence for multiband CdGM states in iron-based superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03637 by A. Glezer Moshe, G. Blumberg, Hee Taek Yi, R. Nagarajan, Seongshik Oh, T. R\~o\~om, U. Nagel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Energies of the CdGM states for electrons (blue) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The schematics of Faraday rotation measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The frequency-dependent vortex response in a two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temperature dependence of resistivity for samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bardeen and M

    J. Bardeen and M. J. Stephen, Phys. Rev.140, A1197 (1965)

  2. [2]

    Caroli, P

    C. Caroli, P. G. De Gennes, and J. Matricon, Phys. Lett. 9, 307 (1964)

  3. [3]

    Bardeen, R

    J. Bardeen, R. K¨ ummel, A. E. Jacobs, and L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev.187, 556 (1969)

  4. [4]

    Janko´and J

    B. Janko´and J. D. Shore, Phys. Rev. B46, 9270 (1992)

  5. [5]

    For electronsµ <0, while for holesµ >0

  6. [6]

    Berthod, I

    C. Berthod, I. Maggio-Aprile, J. Bru´ er, A. Erb, and C. Renner, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 237001 (2017)

  7. [7]

    Karrai, E

    K. Karrai, E. J. Choi, F. Dunmore, S. H. Liu, H. D. Drew, Q. Li, D. B. Fenner, Y. D. Zhu, and F.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 152 (1992)

  8. [8]

    T. C. Hsu, Physica C213, 305 (1993)

  9. [9]

    Hsu, E.-J

    T. Hsu, E.-J. Choi, H. Drew, and H.-T. Lihn, Physica C 235-240, 3105 (1994)

  10. [10]

    Choi, H.-T

    E.-J. Choi, H.-T. S. Lihn, H. D. Drew, and T. C. Hsu, Phys. Rev. B49, 13271 (1994)

  11. [11]

    Choi, H.-T

    E.-J. Choi, H.-T. Lihn, S. Kaplan, S. Wu, H. Drew, Q. Li, D. Fenner, J. M. Phillips, and S. Hou, Physica C254, 258 (1995)

  12. [12]

    N. B. Kopnin and A. V. Lopatin, Phys. Rev. B51, 15291 (1995)

  13. [13]

    G. E. Volovik, J. Exper. Theor. Phys. Lett.65, 217 (1997)

  14. [14]

    H.-T. S. Lihn and H. D. Drew, Phys. Rev. B56, 5559 (1997)

  15. [15]

    Nikoli´ c and S

    P. Nikoli´ c and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B73, 134511 (2006)

  16. [16]

    Tesaˇ r, M.ˇSindler, C

    R. Tesaˇ r, M.ˇSindler, C. Kadlec, P. Lipavsk´ y, L. Skrbek, and J. Kol´ aˇ cek, Sci. Rep.11, 10.1038/s41598-021-00846- x (2021)

  17. [17]

    Tesaˇ r, M

    R. Tesaˇ r, M. ˇSindler, P. Lipavsk´ y, J. Kol´ aˇ cek, and C. Kadlec, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.34, 1 (2024)

  18. [18]

    C. C. Homes, Y. M. Dai, J. S. Wen, Z. J. Xu, and G. D. Gu, Phys. Rev. B91, 144503 (2015)

  19. [19]

    Rinott, K

    S. Rinott, K. B. Chashka, A. Ribak, E. D. L. Rienks, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, P. Le Fevre, F. Bertran, M. Rande- ria, and A. Kanigel, Sci. Adv.3, 10.1126/sciadv.1602372 (2017)

  20. [20]

    I. I. Mazin, Nature464, 183 (2010)

  21. [21]

    Complete pnictides fermiology includes five Fermi pock- ets arising from Fe 3dorbitals [54–56, 61]

  22. [22]

    H. Suhl, B. T. Matthias, and L. R. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 552 (1959)

  23. [23]

    Zehetmayer, Supercond

    M. Zehetmayer, Supercond. Sci. Technol.26, 043001 (2013)

  24. [24]

    S.-Z. Lin, J. Phys. Condens. Matter26, 493202 (2014)

  25. [25]

    Babaev, Phys

    E. Babaev, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 067001 (2002)

  26. [26]

    Babaev and M

    E. Babaev and M. Speight, Phys. Rev. B72, 180502 (2005)

  27. [27]

    D. Wang, L. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Zhu, W. Liu, L. Cao, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao, Science362, 333 (2018)

  28. [28]

    Hanaguri, S

    T. Hanaguri, S. Kasahara, J. B¨ oker, I. Eremin, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 077001 (2019)

  29. [29]

    M. Chen, X. Chen, H. Yang, Z. Du, X. Zhu, E. Wang, and H.-H. Wen, Nat. Commun.9, 10.1038/s41467-018- 03404-8 (2018)

  30. [30]

    H. F. Hess, R. B. Robinson, and J. V. Waszczak, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2711 (1990)

  31. [31]

    Z.-J. Yan, Z. Wang, B. Xia, S. Paolini, Y.-T. Chan, N. Di- hingia, H. Rong, P. Xiao, K. D. Halanayake, J. Song, V. Gowda, D. R. Hickey, W. Wu, J. Yu, P. J. Hirschfeld, and C.-Z. Chang, Nature652, 342 (2026). 6

  32. [32]

    Kohn, Phys

    W. Kohn, Phys. Rev.123, 1242 (1961)

  33. [33]

    N. B. Kopnin and V. M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 017003 (2001)

  34. [34]

    P. N. Argyres, Phys. Rev.97, 334 (1955)

  35. [35]

    Levallois, I

    J. Levallois, I. O. Nedoliuk, I. Crassee, and A. B. Kuz- menko, Rev. Sci. Instrum.86, 033906 (2015)

  36. [36]

    [35, 63]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/linkfor the de- tails of measurement of rotation and fitting of rotation spectra, which includes Refs. [35, 63]

  37. [37]

    X. Yao, M. Brahlek, H. T. Yi, D. Jain, A. R. Mazza, M.-G. Han, and S. Oh, Nano Letters21, 6518 (2021)

  38. [38]

    H. T. Yi, X. Yao, D. Jain, Y.-T. Chan, A.-H. Chen, M. Brahlek, K. Kisslinger, K. Du, M.-G. Han, Y. Zhu, W. Wu, S.-W. Cheong, and S. Oh, Advanced Functional Materials35, 2418259 (2025)

  39. [39]

    The surface state contribution to transmission of the 40 nm thick film is neglectable

  40. [40]

    Note that due to screening effects the maximum in the Faraday rotation spectrum is at a significantly lower fre- quency than the bare CdGM resonancesω k 0, Fig. 4

  41. [41]

    effective Verdet parameter

    Because of contribution of thin film interfaces to the ro- tation the “effective Verdet parameter” depends on the material thickness

  42. [42]

    N. B. Kopnin and V. M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3952 (1998)

  43. [43]

    The sgn(q) is +1 for holes and−1 for electrons and sgn(B) is the sign of magnetic field projected on the ˆz axis

  44. [44]

    N. B. Kopnin, Rep. Prog. Phys.65, 1633 (2002)

  45. [45]

    He real part of the conductivityσ 0 is nearly frequency independent in the region of measurement. Its value is comparable to directly measured conductivity in similar films [51, 52] and it is likely to originate from quasipar- ticles associated with the larger Fermi pockets, whose energy gaps are smaller than the frequency range probed in our measurements

  46. [46]

    Labusch, Phys

    R. Labusch, Phys. Rev.170, 470 (1968)

  47. [47]

    C. J. van der Beek, V. B. Geshkenbein, and V. M. Vi- nokur, Phys. Rev. B48, 3393 (1993)

  48. [48]

    C. C. de Souza Silva, J. A. Aguiar, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Phys. Rev. B68, 134512 (2003)

  49. [49]

    The literature values for pinning constant vary fromκ= 0.09×10 4 N m−2 inx= 0.5 films [58] to 1.4×10 4 N m−2 inx= 0.4 crystals [57]

  50. [50]

    Note that although the superconducting condensate con- ductivityσ sc and the pinning term in vortex conductivity σv ± have the same non-resonant frequency dependence, i/ω, the latter is scaled by magnetic field, see Eq. (8)

  51. [51]

    Romero, H

    R. Romero, H. T. Yi, S. Oh, and N. P. Armitage, Planck- ian scattering and parallel conduction channels in the iron chalcogenide superconductors FeTe 1−xSex (2025), arXiv:2505.00623

  52. [52]

    Stensberg, P

    J. Stensberg, P. M. Tam, X. Yuan, X. Yao, H. Yu, C.-Y. Lee, A.-H. Chen, P. J. D. Crowley, M. Brahlek, I. Takeuchi, S. Oh, J. Orenstein, C. Kane, and L. Wu, Persistent fluctuating superconductivity and planckian dissipation in Fe(Te,Se) (2025), arXiv:2509.13969

  53. [53]

    N. B. Kopnin, Physical Review B54, 9475 (1996)

  54. [54]

    Tamai, A

    A. Tamai, A. Y. Ganin, E. Rozbicki, J. Bacsa, W. Meevasana, P. D. C. King, M. Caffio, R. Schaub, S. Margadonna, K. Prassides, M. J. Rosseinsky, and F. Baumberger, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 097002 (2010)

  55. [55]

    Z. K. Liu, M. Yi, Y. Zhang, J. Hu, R. Yu, J.-X. Zhu, R.- H. He, Y. L. Chen, M. Hashimoto, R. G. Moore, S.-K. Mo, Z. Hussain, Q. Si, Z. Q. Mao, D. H. Lu, and Z.-X. Shen, Phys. Rev. B92, 235138 (2015)

  56. [56]

    A. B. Morfoot, T. K. Kim, M. D. Watson, A. A. Haghigh- irad, S. J. Singh, N. Bultinck, and A. I. Coldea, Commu- nications Physics6, 362 (2023)

  57. [57]

    Okada, F

    T. Okada, F. Nabeshima, H. Takahashi, Y. Imai, and A. Maeda, Phys. Rev. B91, 054510 (2015)

  58. [58]

    Pompeo, A

    N. Pompeo, A. Alimenti, K. Torokhtii, G. Sylva, V. Brac- cini, and E. Silva, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1559, 012055 (2020)

  59. [59]

    4) andκ(Table I), is 0.12−0.17 THz, which is similar to 0.15 THz obtained in [64]

    The pinning frequency (2π) −1 q κ/(|M e +|+|M h −|) with masses evaluated at 0.3 THz (Fig. 4) andκ(Table I), is 0.12−0.17 THz, which is similar to 0.15 THz obtained in [64]. The vortex mass obtained in [64] under intense THz pulse is not directly comparable to results of this study obtained under CW radiation

  60. [60]

    Prozorov, V

    R. Prozorov, V. G. Kogan, M. Ko´ nczykowski, and M. A. Tanatar, Phys. Rev. B109, 024506 (2024)

  61. [61]

    Z. P. Yin, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Nat. Mater.10, 932 (2011)

  62. [62]

    Berthod, Phys

    C. Berthod, Phys. Rev. B98, 144519 (2018)

  63. [63]

    D. B. Tanner,Optical Effects in Solids(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2019)

  64. [64]

    Nakamura, H

    S. Nakamura, H. Matsumoto, H. Ogawa, T. Kobayashi, F. Nabeshima, A. Maeda, and R. Shimano, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 036004 (2024)

  65. [65]

    Sawada, F

    Y. Sawada, F. Nabeshima, Y. Imai, and A. Maeda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.85, 073703 (2016)

  66. [66]

    Tinkham, Phys

    M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev.104, 845 (1956)

  67. [67]

    R. E. Glover and M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev.104, 844 (1956)

  68. [68]

    R. E. Glover and M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev.108, 243 (1957)

  69. [69]

    Li and T

    Y. Li and T. F. Heinz, 2D Materials5, 025021 (2018)

  70. [70]

    Ubrig, I

    N. Ubrig, I. Crassee, J. Levallois, I. O. Nedoliuk, F. Fromm, M. Kaiser, T. Seyller, and A. B. Kuzmenko, Opt. Express21, 24736 (2013)

  71. [71]

    C. C. Homes, A. Akrap, J. Wen, Z. Xu, Z. Wei Lin, Q. Li, and G. Gu, J. Phys. Chem. Solids72, 505 (2011). 7 END MA TTER Sample growth and characterization.Epitaxial FeTe1−xSex films of thickness 40 nm were grown at nom- inal doping levels ofx= 0.15 andx= 0.38 by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [37, 38]. The heterostructure con- sisted of a 3 nm Bi 2Se3 buffer...