Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Simulation-based inference from the Lyman-alpha forest 1D power spectrum with CAMELS

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2603.13011 v2 pith:5YPGY6LL submitted 2026-03-13 astro-ph.CO

Simulation-based inference from the Lyman-alpha forest 1D power spectrum with CAMELS

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords parametersforesttrainingalphacosmologicallyman-modelssigma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We perform for the first time full simulation-based inference on the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest 1D power spectrum. In particular, we consider the prediction of the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest $P_{\rm 1D}(k)$ at $2.0<z<3.5$ from the CAMELS cosmological hydrodynamic simulations run with the IllustrisTNG and SIMBA galaxy formation models. We train a normalizing flow to perform neural posterior estimation of two cosmological parameters ($\Omega_m$ and $\sigma_8$) and four astrophysical parameters parametrizing supernova and AGN feedback. When training and testing the neural network on the same baryon physics model, the posterior distributions of the cosmological parameters are found to be in excellent agreement with the true parameters values (within $10\%$ deviations in $\gtrsim 75\%$ and $\gtrsim 90\%$ of the cases for $\Omega_m$ and $\sigma_8$, and a precision better than $10\%$ in both), while the astrophysical parameters are generally unconstrained due to the limited probed volume. When training on one model and testing on the other (e.g., training on IllustrisTNG and testing on SIMBA, or viceversa), the performance is significantly worse, both in accuracy and in precision, resulting in a $\sim 10\%$ positive bias on the predicted values for $\sigma_8$. We show that a multi-domain training based on the combination of simulations from both models recovers unbiased constraints, offering an effective solution to cope with the complex problem of the lack of convergence in the predictions from different galaxy formation models. This study represents a promising way forward to constrain cosmology and fundamental physics with the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest with artificial intelligence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Field-level multi-tracers simulation-based inference of cosmological parameters from 3D maps

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The work demonstrates that multi-tracer field-level SBI on galaxy and HI maps yields 2-7 times better constraints on Omega_m and sigma_8 than single-tracer or summary-statistic approaches, with 3D maps performing best.