REVIEW
Forecasting the E_G measurements from the photometric and spectroscopic surveys of Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope (CSST)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Forecasting the E_G measurements from the photometric and spectroscopic surveys of Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope (CSST)
read the original abstract
We present forecasts for the $E_G$ statistic using redshift distributions of realistic mock galaxy samples from the upcoming Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope (CSST). The dominant uncertainty in $E_G$ stems from the redshift space distortion parameter $\beta$, whose precision limits the overall constraining power. Our analysis shows that CSST will nevertheless achieve $E_G$ constraints at the few-percent level ($3\%-9\%$) over $0 < z < 1.2$, an improvement by a factor of several to an order of magnitude over current observations. Within the $\mu-\Sigma$ modified gravity framework, the parameter $\Sigma_0$, associated with the effective gravitational constant of the Weyl potential, can be constrained to $\sim 5\%$ precision. In a plausible scenario where upcoming spectroscopic surveys determine $\beta$ to $1\%$ accuracy, $E_G$ constraints tighten to the percent level, and $\Sigma_0$ becomes measurable at $\sim 1\%$. For representative modified gravity scenarios, we find that the potential deviations from the Hu--Sawicki $f(R)$ model and the normal-branch Dvali--Gabadadze--Porrati (nDGP) model remain detectable within the expected sensitivity of CSST. These results demonstrate that CSST will serve as a powerful facility for testing gravity and underscore the essential synergy between photometric weak lensing and spectroscopic surveys in probing cosmic acceleration.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.