REVIEW 1 cited by
Kernel Selection for Gaussian Process in Cosmology: with Approximate Bayesian Computation Rejection and Nested Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Kernel Selection for Gaussian Process in Cosmology: with Approximate Bayesian Computation Rejection and Nested Sampling
read the original abstract
Gaussian Process (GP) has gained much attention in cosmology due to its ability to reconstruct cosmological data in a model-independent manner. In this study, we compare two methods for GP kernel selection: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) Rejection and nested sampling. We analyze three types of data: cosmic Chronometer data (CC), Type Ia Supernovae (SNIa), and Gamma Ray Burst (GRB), using five kernel functions. To evaluate the differences between kernel functions, we assess the strength of evidence using Bayes factors. Our results show that, for ABC Rejection, the Mat\'ern kernel with $\nu$=5/2 (M52 kernel) outperformes the commonly used Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel in approximating all three datasets. Bayes factors indicate that the M52 kernel typically supports the observed data better than the RBF kernel, but with no clear advantage over other alternatives. However, nested sampling gives different results, with the M52 kernel losing its advantage. Nevertheless, Bayes factors indicate no significant dependence of the data on each kernel.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Comparative Analysis of EMCEE, Gaussian Process, and Masked Autoregressive Flow in Constraining the Hubble Constant Using Cosmic Chronometers Dataset
EMCEE outperforms GP and MAF in recovering true H0 from mock cosmic chronometer datasets, with GP most sensitive to data points via delete-d jackknife analysis.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.