Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A New Approach to Estimating Effective Resistances and Counting Spanning Trees in Expander Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.01468 v1 pith:VNCVV74V submitted 2022-11-02 cs.DS

A New Approach to Estimating Effective Resistances and Counting Spanning Trees in Expander Graphs

classification cs.DS
keywords epsilonwidetildetimeeffectiveresistancesbestexpandersize
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that for expander graphs, for all $\epsilon > 0,$ there exists a data structure of size $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-1})$ which can be used to return $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximations to effective resistances in $\widetilde{O}(1)$ time per query. Short of storing all effective resistances, previous best approaches could achieve $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-2})$ size and $\widetilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ time per query by storing Johnson-Lindenstrauss vectors for each vertex, or $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-1})$ size and $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-1})$ time per query by storing a spectral sketch. Our construction is based on two key ideas: 1) $\epsilon^{-1}$-sparse, $\epsilon$-additive approximations to $DL^+1_u$ for all $u,$ can be used to recover $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximations to the effective resistances, 2) In expander graphs, only $\widetilde{O}(\epsilon^{-1})$ coordinates of a vector similar to $DL^+1_u$ are larger than $\epsilon.$ We give an efficient construction for such a data structure in $\widetilde{O}(m + n\epsilon^{-2})$ time via random walks. This results in an algorithm for computing $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate effective resistances for $s$ vertex pairs in expanders that runs in $\widetilde{O}(m + n\epsilon^{-2} + s)$ time, improving over the previously best known running time of $m^{1 + o(1)} + (n + s)n^{o(1)}\epsilon^{-1.5}$ for $s = \omega(n\epsilon^{-0.5}).$ We employ the above algorithm to compute a $(1+\delta)$-approximation to the number of spanning trees in an expander graph, or equivalently, approximating the (pseudo)determinant of its Laplacian in $\widetilde{O}(m + n^{1.5}\delta^{-1})$ time. This improves on the previously best known result of $m^{1+o(1)} + n^{1.875+o(1)}\delta^{-1.75}$ time, and matches the best known size of determinant sparsifiers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.