Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
read the original abstract
Large-scale pre-training has recently emerged as a technique for creating capable, general purpose, generative models such as GPT-3, Megatron-Turing NLG, Gopher, and many others. In this paper, we highlight a counterintuitive property of such models and discuss the policy implications of this property. Namely, these generative models have an unusual combination of predictable loss on a broad training distribution (as embodied in their "scaling laws"), and unpredictable specific capabilities, inputs, and outputs. We believe that the high-level predictability and appearance of useful capabilities drives rapid development of such models, while the unpredictable qualities make it difficult to anticipate the consequences of model deployment. We go through examples of how this combination can lead to socially harmful behavior with examples from the literature and real world observations, and we also perform two novel experiments to illustrate our point about harms from unpredictability. Furthermore, we analyze how these conflicting properties combine to give model developers various motivations for deploying these models, and challenges that can hinder deployment. We conclude with a list of possible interventions the AI community may take to increase the chance of these models having a beneficial impact. We intend this paper to be useful to policymakers who want to understand and regulate AI systems, technologists who care about the potential policy impact of their work, and academics who want to analyze, critique, and potentially develop large generative models.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
Beyond Pairs: Your Language Model is Secretly Optimizing a Preference Graph
GraphDPO generalizes pairwise DPO to a graph-structured Plackett-Luce objective over DAGs induced by rollout rankings, enforcing transitivity with linear complexity and recovering DPO as a special case.
-
Understanding the Mechanism of Altruism in Large Language Models
A small set of sparse autoencoder features in LLMs drives shifts between generous and selfish allocations in dictator games, with causal patching and steering confirming their role and generalization to other social games.
-
The Falcon Series of Open Language Models
Falcon-180B is a 180B-parameter open decoder-only model trained on 3.5 trillion tokens that approaches PaLM-2-Large performance at lower cost and is released with dataset extracts.
-
Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned
RLHF-aligned language models show increasing resistance to red teaming with scale up to 52B parameters, unlike prompted or rejection-sampled models, supported by a released dataset of 38,961 attacks.
-
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Language models show good calibration when asked to estimate the probability that their own answers are correct, with performance improving as models get larger.
-
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Emergent abilities are capabilities present in large language models but absent in smaller ones and cannot be predicted by extrapolating smaller model performance.
-
Scaling Laws and Interpretability of Learning from Repeated Data
Repeating 0.1% of training data 100 times degrades an 800M parameter model's performance to that of a 400M model by damaging copying mechanisms and induction heads associated with generalization.
-
Emergent Semantic Role Understanding in Language Models
Semantic role understanding partially emerges during language model pre-training, with linear probes on frozen representations achieving substantial performance that improves with scale but does not match fine-tuned m...
-
Artificial Jagged Intelligence as Uneven Optimization Energy Allocation Capability Concentration, Redistribution, and Optimization Governance
AJI frames jagged AI capabilities as lower bounds on performance dispersion arising from concentrated optimization energy allocation under anisotropic objectives, with theorems on tradeoffs and redistribution interventions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.