REVIEW
Valuation semantics for first-order logics of evidence and truth (and some related logics)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Valuation semantics for first-order logics of evidence and truth (and some related logics)
read the original abstract
This paper introduces the logic $QLET_{F}$, a quantified extension of the logic of evidence and truth $LET_{F}$, together with a corresponding sound and complete first-order non-deterministic valuation semantics. $LET_{F}$ is a paraconsistent and paracomplete sentential logic that extends the logic of first-degree entailment ($FDE$) with a classicality operator ${\circ}$ and a non-classicality operator $\bullet$, dual to each other: while ${\circ} A$ entails that $A$ behaves classically, ${\bullet} A$ follows from $A$'s violating some classically valid inferences. The semantics of $QLET_{F}$ combines structures that interpret negated predicates in terms of anti-extensions with first-order non-deterministic valuations, and completeness is obtained through a generalization of Henkin's method. By providing sound and complete semantics for first-order extensions of $FDE$, $K3$, and $LP$, we show how these tools, which we call here the method of ``anti-extensions + valuations'', can be naturally applied to a number of non-classical logics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.