Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Campbell penetration depth in low carrier density superconductor YPtBi

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.05908 v2 pith:N4ZE2FZO submitted 2021-04-13 cond-mat.supr-con

Campbell penetration depth in low carrier density superconductor YPtBi

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords lambdafielddensitydepthmagneticpenetrationyptbicampbell
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Magnetic penetration depth, $\lambda_{m}$, was measured as a function of temperature and magnetic field in single crystals of low carrier density superconductor YPtBi by using a tunnel-diode oscillator technique. Measurements in zero DC magnetic field yield London penetration depth, $\lambda_{L}\left(T\right)$, but in the applied field the signal includes the Campbell penetration depth, $\lambda_{C}\left(T\right)$, which is the characteristic length of the attenuation of small excitation field, $H_{ac}$, into the Abrikosov vortex lattice due to its elasticity. Whereas the magnetic field dependent $\lambda_C$ exhibit $\lambda_{C}\sim B^{p}$ with $p=1/2$ in most of the conventional and unconventional superconductors, we found that $p\approx 0.23\ll1/2$ in YPtBi due to rapid suppression of the pinning strength. From the measured $\lambda_{C}(T,H)$, the critical current density is $j_{c}\approx40\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{cm^{2}}$ at 75 mK. This is orders of magnitude lower than that of conventional superconductors of comparable $T_{c}$. Since the pinning centers (lattice defects) and vortex structure are not expected to be much different in YPtBi, this observation is direct evidence of the low density of the Cooper pairs because $j_{c}\propto n_s$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.