Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the Mutual Interference between Spaceborne SARs: Modeling, Characterization, and Mitigation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.06819 v2 pith:P5W5SMMI submitted 2020-10-14 eess.SP

On the Mutual Interference between Spaceborne SARs: Modeling, Characterization, and Mitigation

classification eess.SP
keywords artefactimageinterferencemutualspaceborneartefactsfrequencymethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) regulatory the radio spectrum available to spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is restricted to certain limited frequency intervals, there are many different spaceborne SAR systems sharing common frequency bands. Due to this reason, it is reported that two spaceborne SARs at orbit cross positions can potentially cause severe mutual interference. Specifically, the transmitting signal of a SAR, typically linear frequency modulated (LFM), can be directly received by the side or back lobes of another SAR's antenna, causing radiometric artefacts in the focused image. This paper tries to model and characterize the artefacts, and study efficient methods for mitigating them. To this end, we formulate an analytical model for describing the artefact, which reveals that the mutual interference can introduce a two-dimensional LFM radiometric artefact in image domain with a limited spatial extent. We show that the artefact is low-rank based on range-azimuth decoupling analysis and two-dimensional high-order Taylor expansion. Based on the low rank model, we show that two methods, i.e., principle component analysis and its robust variant, can be adopted to efficiently mitigate the artefact via processing in image domain. The former method has the advantage of fast processing speed, for example, a sub-swath of Sentinel-1 interferometric wide swath image can be processed within 70 seconds via block-wise operation, whereas the latter provides improved accuracy for sparse point-like scatterers. Experiment results demonstrate that the radiometric artefacts caused by mutual interference in Sentinel-1 level-1 images can be efficiently mitigated via the proposed methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.