Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Balancing truncation and round-off errors in practical FEM: one-dimensional analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.08004 v1 pith:446J4HQL submitted 2019-12-17 math.NA cs.NA

Balancing truncation and round-off errors in practical FEM: one-dimensional analysis

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords accuracyattainablehighesterrormethodround-offerrorsone-dimensional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In finite element methods (FEMs), the accuracy of the solution cannot increase indefinitely because the round-off error increases when the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs) is large enough. This means that the accuracy that can be reached is limited. A priori information of the highest attainable accuracy is therefore of great interest. In this paper, we devise an innovative method to obtain the highest attainable accuracy. In this method, the truncation error is extrapolated when it converges at the analytical rate, for which only a few primary $h$-refinements are required, and the bound of the round-off error is provided through extensive numerical experiments. The highest attainable accuracy is obtained by minimizing the sum of these two types of errors. We validate this method using a one-dimensional Helmholtz equation in space. It shows that the highest attainable accuracy can be accurately predicted, and the CPU time required is much less compared with that using the successive $h$-refinement.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.