Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Bayesian Asteroseismology data Modeling pipeline and its application to it K2 data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.11927 v2 pith:HKUSLR3H submitted 2019-09-26 astro-ph.SR

The Bayesian Asteroseismology data Modeling pipeline and its application to it K2 data

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords mathrmasteroseismologydataparameterspipelineanalysisapplicationbayesian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the Bayesian Asteroseismology data Modeling (BAM) pipeline, an automated asteroseismology pipeline that returns global oscillation parameters and granulation parameters from the analysis of photometric time-series. BAM also determines if a star is likely to be a solar-like oscillator. We have designed BAM to specially process ${\it K2}$ light curves, which suffer from unique noise signatures that can confuse asteroseismic analysis, though it may be used on any photometric time series --- including those from ${\it Kepler}$ and ${\it TESS}$. We demonstrate the BAM oscillation parameters are consistent within $\sim 1.53\%\ (\mathrm{random}) \pm 0.2\%\ (\mathrm{systematic})$ and $1.51\%\ (\mathrm{random}) \pm 0.6\%\ (\mathrm{systematic})$ for $\nu_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $\Delta \nu$ with benchmark results for typical ${\it K2}$ red giant stars in the ${\it K2}$ Galactic Archaeology Program's (GAP) Campaign 1 sample. Application of BAM to $13016$ ${\it K2}$ Campaign 1 targets not in the GAP sample yields $104$ red giant solar-like oscillators. Based on the number of serendipitous giants we find, we estimate an upper limit on the average purity in dwarf selection among C1 proposals is $\approx 99\%$, which could be lower when considering incompleteness in BAM detection efficiency, and proper motion cuts specific to C1 Guest Observer proposals.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.