Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Boundary treatment of implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta method for hyperbolic systems with source terms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.01027 v1 pith:WPTB554L submitted 2019-08-02 math.NA cs.NA

Boundary treatment of implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta method for hyperbolic systems with source terms

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords schemesboundaryimexmethodordertreatmentexplicitaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we develop a high order finite difference boundary treatment method for the implicit-explicit (IMEX) Runge-Kutta (RK) schemes solving hyperbolic systems with possibly stiff source terms on a Cartesian mesh. The main challenge is how to obtain the solutions at ghost points resulting from the wide stencil of the interior high order scheme. We address this problem by combining the idea of using the RK schemes at the boundary and an inverse Lax-Wendroff procedure. The former preserves the accuracy of the RK schemes and the latter guarantees the stability. Our method is different from the widely used approach for the explicit RK schemes by imposing boundary conditions at intermediate stages, which could not be derived for the IMEX schemes. In addition, the intermediate boundary conditions are only available for explicit RK schemes up to third order while our method applies to arbitrary order IMEX and explicit RK schemes. Moreover, the present boundary treatment method may be adapted to IMEX RK schemes solving many other partial differential equations. For a specific third-order IMEX scheme, we demonstrate the good stability and third-order accuracy of our boundary treatment through both 1D examples and 2D reactive Euler equations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.