Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Non-Reversible Parallel Tempering: a Scalable Highly Parallel MCMC Scheme

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.02939 v4 pith:PCFXVRZE submitted 2019-05-08 stat.CO

Non-Reversible Parallel Tempering: a Scalable Highly Parallel MCMC Scheme

classification stat.CO
keywords non-reversibledistributionparallelreversibleschemesclasshighlyidentify
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Parallel tempering (PT) methods are a popular class of Markov chain Monte Carlo schemes used to sample complex high-dimensional probability distributions. They rely on a collection of $N$ interacting auxiliary chains targeting tempered versions of the target distribution to improve the exploration of the state-space. We provide here a new perspective on these highly parallel algorithms and their tuning by identifying and formalizing a sharp divide in the behaviour and performance of reversible versus non-reversible PT schemes. We show theoretically and empirically that a class of non-reversible PT methods dominates its reversible counterparts and identify distinct scaling limits for the non-reversible and reversible schemes, the former being a piecewise-deterministic Markov process and the latter a diffusion. These results are exploited to identify the optimal annealing schedule for non-reversible PT and to develop an iterative scheme approximating this schedule. We provide a wide range of numerical examples supporting our theoretical and methodological contributions. The proposed methodology is applicable to sample from a distribution $\pi$ with a density $L$ with respect to a reference distribution $\pi_0$ and compute the normalizing constant. A typical use case is when $\pi_0$ is a prior distribution, $L$ a likelihood function and $\pi$ the corresponding posterior.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.