Pith. sign in

REVIEW

KIC 2568888: To be or not to be a binary

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.06206 v1 pith:IB2NVW72 submitted 2018-10-15 astro-ph.SR

KIC 2568888: To be or not to be a binary

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords binarysystemasteroseismicchanceclosedistancesgaiamagnitudes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In cases where both components of a binary system show oscillations, asteroseismology has been proposed as a method to identify the system. For KIC 2568888, observed with $Kepler$, we detect oscillation modes for two red giants in a single power density spectrum. Through an asteroseismic study we investigate if the stars have similar properties, which could be an indication that they are physically bound into a binary system. While one star lies on the red giant branch (RGB), the other, more evolved star, is either a RGB or asymptotic-giant-branch star. We found similar ages for the red giants and a mass ratio close to 1. Based on these asteroseismic results we propose KIC 2568888 as a rare candidate binary system ($\sim 0.1\%$ chance). However, when combining the asteroseismic data with ground-based $BVI$ photometry we estimated different distances for the stars, which we cross-checked with $Gaia$ DR2. From $Gaia$ we obtained for one object a distance between and broadly consistent with the distances from $BVI$ photometry. For the other object we have a negative parallax with a not yet reliable $Gaia$ distance solution. The derived distances challenge a binary interpretation and may either point to a triple system, which could explain the visible magnitudes, or, to a rare chance alignment ($\sim 0.05\%$ chance based on stellar magnitudes). This probability would even be smaller, if calculated for close pairs of stars with a mass ratio close to unity in addition to similar magnitudes, which may indeed indicate that a binary scenario is more favourable.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.