Reply to the Comments on the 12C+12C fusion S^*-factor

A. Tumino; C. Spitaleri; G.G. Rapisarda; G.L. Guardo; H. Petrascu; I. Indelicato; L. Lamia; L. Trache; M. Gulino; M. La Cognata

REVIEW

Reply to the Comments on the 12C+12C fusion S^*-factor

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.06148 v1 pith:JDHBOI4T submitted 2018-07-16 nucl-ex

Reply to the Comments on the 12C+12C fusion S^*-factor

A. Tumino , C. Spitaleri , M. La Cognata , S. Cherubini , G.L. Guardo , M. Gulino , S. Hayakawa , I. Indelicato

show 9 more authors

L. Lamia H. Petrascu R.G. Pizzone S.M.R. Puglia G.G. Rapisarda S. Romano M.L. Sergi R. Spart\'a L. Trache

This is my paper

classification nucl-ex

keywords replyarxivattentionauthoredcommentcommentsdrawfactor

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

The goal of this reply is to draw attention of the readers that the major problems rose in the short Comment authored by A.M. Mukhamedzhanov, X. Tang and D.Y. Pang (arXiv:1806.05921) are totally groundless.

Reply to the Comments on the 12C+12C fusion S^*-factor

discussion (0)