Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving baryon acoustic oscillation measurement with the combination of cosmic voids and galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1802.03990 v2 pith:KEKVPRAS submitted 2018-02-12 astro-ph.CO

Improving baryon acoustic oscillation measurement with the combination of cosmic voids and galaxies

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords galaxiesvoidssamplepeakacousticapplyingbaryonconstraint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a methodology to optimise the measurement of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) from a given galaxy sample. In our previous work, we demonstrated that one can measure BAO from tracers in under-dense regions (voids). In this study, we combine the over-dense and under-dense tracers (galaxies & voids) to obtain better constraints on the BAO scale. To this end, we modify the de-wiggled BAO model with an additional parameter to describe both the BAO peak and the underlying exclusion pattern of void 2PCFs. We show that after applying BAO reconstruction to galaxies, the BAO peak scale of both galaxies and voids are unbiased using the modified model. Furthermore, we use a new 2PCF estimator for a multi-tracer analysis with galaxies and voids. In simulations, the joint sample improves by about 10% the constraint for the post-reconstruction BAO peak position compared to the result from galaxies alone, which is equivalent to an enlargement of the survey volume by 20%. Applying this method to the BOSS DR12 data, we have an 18% improvement for the low-z sample (0.2<z<0.5), but a worse constraint for the high-z sample (0.5<z<0.75), which is consistent with statistical fluctuations for the current survey volume. Future larger samples will give more robust improvements due to less statistical fluctuations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmic variance or galaxy bias? Disentangling finite-volume and galaxy formation effects in cosmological analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Develops a galaxy-biasing formalism for cosmic variance using perturbation theory and tests it on the non-linear BAO shift against N-body simulations.