Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Subgroup Balancing Propensity Score

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.05835 v1 pith:HRBFQDJO submitted 2017-07-18 stat.ME

Subgroup Balancing Propensity Score

classification stat.ME
keywords subgrouppropensityscoresbpstreatmenteffectsoverallsample
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the estimation of subgroup treatment effects with observational data. Existing propensity score matching and weighting methods are mostly developed for estimating overall treatment effect. Although the true propensity score should balance covariates for the subgroup populations, the estimated propensity score may not balance covariates for the subgroup samples. We propose the subgroup balancing propensity score (SBPS) method, which selects, for each subgroup, to use either the overall sample or the subgroup sample to estimate propensity scores for units within that subgroup, in order to optimize a criterion accounting for a set of covariate-balancing conditions for both the overall sample and the subgroup samples. We develop a stochastic search algorithm for the estimation of SBPS when the number of subgroups is large. We demonstrate through simulations that the SBPS can improve the performance of propensity score matching in estimating subgroup treatment effects. We then apply the SBPS method to data from the Italy Survey of Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) to estimate the treatment effects of having debit card on household consumption for different income groups.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.