Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Constraining the Mass and the Non-Radial Drag Coefficient of a Solar Coronal Mass Ejection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1503.00664 v1 pith:24OPPBUC submitted 2015-03-02 astro-ph.SR

Constraining the Mass and the Non-Radial Drag Coefficient of a Solar Coronal Mass Ejection

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords forecatmassobservationscoefficientdragmagneticableconstrain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decades of observations show that CMEs can deflect from a purely radial trajectory yet no consensus exists as to the cause of these deflections. Many of theories attribute the CME deflection to magnetic forces. We developed ForeCAT (Kay et al. 2013, Kay et al. 2015), a model for CME deflections based solely on magnetic forces, neglecting any reconnection effects. Here we compare ForeCAT predictions to the observed deflection of the 2008 December 12 CME and find that ForeCAT can accurately reproduce the observations. Multiple observations show that this CME deflected nearly 30{\deg} in latitude (Byrne et al. 2010, Gui et al. 2011) and 4.4{\deg} in longitude (Gui et al. 2011). From the observations, we are able to constrain all of the ForeCAT input parameters (initial position, radial propagation speed, and expansion) except the CME mass and the drag coefficient that affects the CME motion. By minimizing the reduced chi-squared, $\chi^2_{\nu}$, between the ForeCAT results and the observations we determine an acceptable mass range between 4.5x10$^{14}$ and 1x10$^{15}$ g and the drag coefficient less than 1.4 with a best fit at 7.5x10$^{14}$ g and 0 for the mass and drag coefficient. ForeCAT is sensitive to the magnetic background and we are also able to constrain the rate at which the quiet sun magnetic field falls to be similar or to or fall slightly slower than the Potential Field Source Surface model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.