REVIEW 4 cited by
The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Testing gravity with redshift-space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Testing gravity with redshift-space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles
read the original abstract
We analyse the anisotropic clustering of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) CMASS Data Release 11 (DR11) sample, which consists of $690\,827$ galaxies in the redshift range $0.43 < z < 0.7$ and has a sky coverage of $8\,498\,\text{deg}^2$. We perform our analysis in Fourier space using a power spectrum estimator suggested by Yamamoto et al. (2006). We measure the multipole power spectra in a self-consistent manner for the first time in the sense that we provide a proper way to treat the survey window function and the integral constraint, without the commonly used assumption of an isotropic power spectrum and without the need to split the survey into sub-regions. The main cosmological signals exploited in our analysis are the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the signal of redshift space distortions, both of which are distorted by the Alcock-Paczynski effect. Together, these signals allow us to constrain the distance ratio $D_V(z_{\rm eff})/r_s(z_d) = 13.89\pm 0.18$, the Alcock-Paczynski parameter $F_{\rm AP}(z_{\rm eff}) = 0.679\pm0.031$ and the growth rate of structure $f(z_{\rm eff})\sigma_8(z_{\rm eff}) = 0.419\pm0.044$ at the effective redshift $z_{\rm eff}=0.57$. We did not find significant systematic uncertainties for $D_V/r_s$ or $F_{\rm AP}$ but include a systematic error for $f\sigma_8$ of $3.1\%$. Combining our dataset with Planck to test General Relativity (GR) through the simple $\gamma$-parameterisation, reveals a $\sim 2\sigma$ tension between the data and the prediction by GR. The tension between our result and GR can be traced back to a tension in the clustering amplitude $\sigma_8$ between CMASS and Planck.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Modeling survey-window and integral-constraint effects on PNG in the galaxy power spectrum with light-cone mocks
Light-cone mocks demonstrate that analytical corrections for survey-window and integral-constraint effects on PNG in galaxy power spectra lose accuracy below the equality scale and fail when PNG is present, enabling u...
-
DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape Galaxy Clustering from Galaxies and Quasars
DESI DR1 full-shape galaxy clustering constrains Omega_m = 0.296 ± 0.010, H0 = 68.63 ± 0.79 km/s/Mpc, and sigma_8 = 0.841 ± 0.034, consistent with LambdaCDM and Planck.
-
Forecasting neutrino mass constraints from the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope
Roman Space Telescope forecasts using Hα galaxy mocks yield m_ν < 0.276 eV (68% CL) with Planck priors via EFT of LSS, and m_ν < 0.36 eV via model-independent phenomenological analysis.
-
The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design
DESI will target luminous red galaxies to z=1, emission-line galaxies to z=1.7, quasars for tracers and Ly-alpha forest at 2.1<z<3.5, plus a bright galaxy survey, to obtain more than 30 million redshifts for BAO and m...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.