Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Structural Intervention Distance (SID) for Evaluating Causal Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1306.1043 v2 pith:TXCSTB5S submitted 2013-06-05 stat.ML

Structural Intervention Distance (SID) for Evaluating Causal Graphs

classification stat.ML
keywords distancecausalgraphsdagsdifferentinferenceinterventionstructural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Causal inference relies on the structure of a graph, often a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Different graphs may result in different causal inference statements and different intervention distributions. To quantify such differences, we propose a (pre-) distance between DAGs, the structural intervention distance (SID). The SID is based on a graphical criterion only and quantifies the closeness between two DAGs in terms of their corresponding causal inference statements. It is therefore well-suited for evaluating graphs that are used for computing interventions. Instead of DAGs it is also possible to compare CPDAGs, completed partially directed acyclic graphs that represent Markov equivalence classes. Since it differs significantly from the popular Structural Hamming Distance (SHD), the SID constitutes a valuable additional measure. We discuss properties of this distance and provide an efficient implementation with software code available on the first author's homepage (an R package is under construction).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Synthetic but Not Realistic: The Evaluation Challenge in Generative Modelling for Structured Electronic Medical Records

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generative models for synthetic EMRs match marginal distributions but fail to preserve subgroup structure, effect estimates, and dependency structure simultaneously on the PRIME-CVD cohort.