Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Auxiliary Particle filtering within adaptive Metropolis-Hastings Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1006.1914 v1 pith:DLTQKQEL submitted 2010-06-09 stat.ME

Auxiliary Particle filtering within adaptive Metropolis-Hastings Sampling

classification stat.ME
keywords particlelikelihoodsimulatedadaptivebecauseefficientfiltermodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our article deals with Bayesian inference for a general state space model with the simulated likelihood computed by the particle filter. We show empirically that the partially or fully adapted particle filters can be much more efficient than the standard particle, especially when the signal to noise ratio is high. This is especially important because using the particle filter within MCMC sampling is O(T^2), where T is the sample size. We also show that an adaptive independent proposal for the unknown parameters based on a mixture of normals can be much more efficient than the usual optimal random walk methods because the simulated likelihood is not continuous in the parameters and the cost of constructing a good adaptive proposal is negligible compared to the cost of evaluating the simulated likelihood. Independent \MH proposals are also attractive because they are easy to run in parallel on multiple processors. The article also shows that the proposed \aimh sampler converges to the posterior distribution. We also show that the marginal likelihood of any state space model can be obtained in an efficient and unbiased manner by using the \pf making model comparison straightforward. Obtaining the marginal likelihood is often difficult using other methods. Finally, we prove that the simulated likelihood obtained by the auxiliary particle filter is unbiased. This result is fundamental to using the particle for MCMC sampling and is first obtained in a more abstract and difficult setting by Del Moral (2004). However, our proof is direct and will make the result accessible to readers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.