pith. sign in

super hub Baseline reference

GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark

Baseline reference. 55% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

232 Pith papers citing it
Baseline 55% of classified citations
abstract

We present GPQA, a challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. We ensure that the questions are high-quality and extremely difficult: experts who have or are pursuing PhDs in the corresponding domains reach 65% accuracy (74% when discounting clear mistakes the experts identified in retrospect), while highly skilled non-expert validators only reach 34% accuracy, despite spending on average over 30 minutes with unrestricted access to the web (i.e., the questions are "Google-proof"). The questions are also difficult for state-of-the-art AI systems, with our strongest GPT-4 based baseline achieving 39% accuracy. If we are to use future AI systems to help us answer very hard questions, for example, when developing new scientific knowledge, we need to develop scalable oversight methods that enable humans to supervise their outputs, which may be difficult even if the supervisors are themselves skilled and knowledgeable. The difficulty of GPQA both for skilled non-experts and frontier AI systems should enable realistic scalable oversight experiments, which we hope can help devise ways for human experts to reliably get truthful information from AI systems that surpass human capabilities.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 18 background 14 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract We present GPQA, a challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. We ensure that the questions are high-quality and extremely difficult: experts who have or are pursuing PhDs in the corresponding domains reach 65% accuracy (74% when discounting clear mistakes the experts identified in retrospect), while highly skilled non-expert validators only reach 34% accuracy, despite spending on average over 30 minutes with unrestricted access to the web (i.e., the questions are "Google-proof"). The questions are also difficult for state-

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling

cs.CL · 2026-05-08 · conditional · novelty 8.0 · 2 refs

AutoTTS discovers width-depth test-time scaling controllers through agentic search in a pre-collected trajectory environment, yielding better accuracy-cost tradeoffs than hand-designed baselines on math reasoning tasks at low cost.

Large Language Diffusion Models

cs.CL · 2025-02-14 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

LLaDA is a scalable diffusion-based language model that matches autoregressive LLMs like LLaMA3 8B on tasks and surpasses GPT-4o on reversal poem completion.

LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research

cs.AI · 2024-07-14 · accept · novelty 8.0

LAB-Bench provides over 2,400 multiple-choice questions to measure LLM performance on real biology research tasks like literature recall, figure reading, database access, and sequence manipulation, with initial results compared against human expert biologists.

Meta-Benchmarks for Financial-Services LLM Evaluation

cs.AI · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A meta-benchmarking framework organizes 452 LLM benchmarks into 41 O*NET Generalized Work Activities and 38 BIAN domains, using discrimination-coverage-recency weights to scale K-factors in an Elo tournament for comparable financial-services scores.

Atomistic Language Models Understand and Generate Materials

cs.LG · 2026-06-19 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ALMs unify pretrained atomistic encoder, LLM, and denoising diffusion via continuous projectors and staged training to reach SOTA on text-conditioned crystal prediction and de novo generation.

GraphPO: Graph-based Policy Optimization for Reasoning Models

cs.CL · 2026-06-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

GraphPO represents reasoning rollouts as a DAG to merge semantically equivalent paths, share suffixes, and assign separate efficiency and correctness advantages for lower variance and better performance than chain or tree baselines.

Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization: Teacher in Prompts, Not Gradients

cs.CL · 2026-06-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ZPPO improves distillation to small vision-language models by using binary and negative candidate prompts plus a replay buffer for hard questions, outperforming standard distillation and GRPO on a 31-benchmark suite with largest gains at the 0.8B scale.

Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark

cs.AI · 2026-06-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Introduces KINA benchmark with 899 items over 261 disciplines, formal (1-1/e) coverage guarantee and bonus-on-bar tournament theorem, plus evaluations of 42 models with top score 53.17%.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 232 citing papers.