Pith. sign in

International conference on machine learning , pages=

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

fields

cs.LG 2 cs.CV 1

years

2026 3

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 3

representative citing papers

Active Tabular Augmentation via Policy-Guided Diffusion Inpainting

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

TAP couples a learner-conditioned policy with diffusion inpainting to generate and selectively inject high-utility tabular augmentations, yielding up to 15.6 pp accuracy gains and 32% RMSE reduction on seven datasets under severe scarcity.

Neuron-Aware Active Few-Shot Learning for LLMs

cs.LG · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

NeuFS selects active few-shot samples for LLMs by representing samples via neuron activation patterns and applying a dual-criteria strategy of diversity and neuron consensus to identify informative examples.

Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning?

cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Active learning with randomly initialized models achieves comparable results to traditional candidate-model methods, with low-confidence sampling proving most effective.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • Active Tabular Augmentation via Policy-Guided Diffusion Inpainting cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · none · ref 57

    TAP couples a learner-conditioned policy with diffusion inpainting to generate and selectively inject high-utility tabular augmentations, yielding up to 15.6 pp accuracy gains and 32% RMSE reduction on seven datasets under severe scarcity.

  • Neuron-Aware Active Few-Shot Learning for LLMs cs.LG · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · none · ref 16

    NeuFS selects active few-shot samples for LLMs by representing samples via neuron activation patterns and applying a dual-criteria strategy of diversity and neuron consensus to identify informative examples.

  • Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning? cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · none · ref 103

    Active learning with randomly initialized models achieves comparable results to traditional candidate-model methods, with low-confidence sampling proving most effective.