Pith. sign in

When the Majority is Wrong : Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective Tasks , November 2023

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 2

years

2026 1 2024 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Understanding Annotator Safety Policy with Interpretability

cs.AI · 2026-05-06 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Annotator Policy Models learn safety policies from labeling behavior alone, accurately predicting responses and revealing sources of disagreement like policy ambiguity and value pluralism.

A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment

cs.AI · 2024-02-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

The paper formalizes three types of pluralistic AI models and three benchmark classes, arguing that current alignment techniques may reduce rather than increase distributional pluralism.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Understanding Annotator Safety Policy with Interpretability cs.AI · 2026-05-06 · unverdicted · none · ref 7

    Annotator Policy Models learn safety policies from labeling behavior alone, accurately predicting responses and revealing sources of disagreement like policy ambiguity and value pluralism.

  • A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment cs.AI · 2024-02-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 31 · 2 links

    The paper formalizes three types of pluralistic AI models and three benchmark classes, arguing that current alignment techniques may reduce rather than increase distributional pluralism.