{"as_of":"2026-07-14T11:11:00Z","canonical_paper_id":"XLZQLNDA","canonical_url":"https://pith.science/paper/XLZQLNDA/integrity","context_digest":"sha256:d791f1df2745186f54d47d1266d29dc76efbc436961e146319521ee8bbce5897","coverage_summary":[],"findings":[],"findings_empty_copy":"No checks are listed for this paper yet.","findings_observation_state":"no_listed_checks","links":{"arxiv":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09316","bundle_json":"/pith/XLZQLNDABPFSP5UI6CJL25ETXC/bundle.json","citation_record":"/paper/XLZQLNDA/citation-record","evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/XLZQLNDA/integrity","integrity_json":"/paper/XLZQLNDA/integrity.json","json":"/paper/XLZQLNDA/integrity.json","legacy_integrity_json":"/pith/XLZQLNDA/integrity.json","paper":"/paper/XLZQLNDA","reference_changes":"/flags?citing=XLZQLNDA"},"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.09316","latest_version":3,"primary_cat":"cs.LG","title":"Are deep learning models superior for missing data imputation in large surveys? Evidence from an empirical comparison"},"pith_number":"pith:2021:XLZQLNDABPFSP5UI6CJL25ETXC","pith_short":"XLZQLNDABPFSP5UI6CJL25ETXC","record":{"arxiv_id":"2103.09316","claim":"As of an unrecorded date, Pith completed 0 of 0 listed checks against arXiv:2103.09316. No listed check completed, so this record makes no findings claim.","counts":{"completed":0,"failed":0,"listed":0,"not_collected":0,"not_requested":0,"partial":0,"public_findings_from_completed":0,"skipped":0,"unavailable":0,"withheld":0},"coverage":[],"observed_at":null,"refusal":"This is a record of named checks, not a clean-status claim or a paper verdict.","schema":"pith.integrity.v1"},"schema":"pith.paper-integrity-record.v1","species":"LEDGER"}