{"as_of":"2026-07-15T08:45:00Z","canonical_paper_id":"KUGVGUSN","canonical_url":"https://pith.science/paper/KUGVGUSN/integrity","context_digest":"sha256:379a45211d28e70f9cf77d4ca1d9ee8e13dfe156728278e1ae8a39aefcc8a818","coverage_summary":[],"findings":[],"findings_empty_copy":"No checks are listed for this paper yet.","findings_observation_state":"no_listed_checks","links":{"arxiv":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12707","bundle_json":"/pith/KUGVGUSNNKEFF35XVTPUFSTIPL/bundle.json","citation_record":"/paper/KUGVGUSN/citation-record","evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/KUGVGUSN/integrity","integrity_json":"/paper/KUGVGUSN/integrity.json","json":"/paper/KUGVGUSN/integrity.json","legacy_integrity_json":"/pith/KUGVGUSN/integrity.json","paper":"/paper/KUGVGUSN","reference_changes":"/flags?citing=KUGVGUSN"},"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2211.12707","latest_version":1,"primary_cat":"cs.CL","title":"Can Open-Domain QA Reader Utilize External Knowledge Efficiently like Humans?"},"pith_number":"pith:2022:KUGVGUSNNKEFF35XVTPUFSTIPL","pith_short":"KUGVGUSNNKEFF35XVTPUFSTIPL","record":{"arxiv_id":"2211.12707","claim":"As of an unrecorded date, Pith completed 0 of 0 listed checks against arXiv:2211.12707. No listed check completed, so this record makes no findings claim.","counts":{"completed":0,"failed":0,"listed":0,"not_collected":0,"not_requested":0,"partial":0,"public_findings_from_completed":0,"skipped":0,"unavailable":0,"withheld":0},"coverage":[],"observed_at":null,"refusal":"This is a record of named checks, not a clean-status claim or a paper verdict.","schema":"pith.integrity.v1"},"schema":"pith.paper-integrity-record.v1","species":"LEDGER"}